Auteur |
Message |
Sujet: Angling a Charge Within a ZOC |
A4
Réponses: 5
Vus: 142
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mar Oct 07, 2025 9:17 pm Sujet: Angling a Charge Within a ZOC |
Thank you all for your help with this. Great to get another rule clear in my head.
Alan |
Sujet: Angling a Charge Within a ZOC |
A4
Réponses: 5
Vus: 142
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mar Sep 16, 2025 11:20 pm Sujet: Angling a Charge Within a ZOC |
While the second bullet on page 36 allows one to charge home on the MTE without qualification, the errata appears to forbid any preliminaries that decreases the alignment.
Thank you, that is very h ... |
Sujet: Angling a Charge Within a ZOC |
A4
Réponses: 5
Vus: 142
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mar Sep 16, 2025 10:00 pm Sujet: Angling a Charge Within a ZOC |
How far does an enemy's zone of control limit the angle at which you can charge?
Knight A is in the zone of control of light horse X and of nobody else. He would like to charge bowman Y, a bit to ... |
Sujet: Cancelling Javelins |
A4
Réponses: 3
Vus: 5635
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Sam Juin 21, 2025 5:08 pm Sujet: Cancelling Javelins |
Thank you both - that is good and clear.
Alan |
Sujet: Cancelling Javelins |
A4
Réponses: 3
Vus: 5635
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Ven Juin 20, 2025 11:05 pm Sujet: Cancelling Javelins |
Pages 18 (Impact) and 19 (Javelin).
An impact foot unit charges a light horse unit armed with javelins. Because the infantry charged horse they do not get an impact bonus in this melee.
Do th ... |
Sujet: Internal Allies |
A4
Réponses: 22
Vus: 3289
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Ven Nov 03, 2023 11:18 am Sujet: Internal Allies |
Thank you all for good and interesting points made.
It is reassuring to see that nobody has found any rules specific to internal allies - I worried that I might have missed them.
In their absenc ... |
Sujet: Internal Allies |
A4
Réponses: 22
Vus: 3289
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Dim Oct 29, 2023 2:29 pm Sujet: Internal Allies |
Are internal allies treated exactly like external allies?
Looking at the Germans (list 91).
1. Tencteri are allowed 0-2 light cavalry. If internal allies are treated just like external allies, ... |
Sujet: Dismounting |
A4
Réponses: 7
Vus: 3918
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Lun Sep 11, 2023 12:06 am Sujet: Dismounting |
Carolingian Frankish (List 153) have it twice
Swabian (HC or Heavy swordmen)
and
Mounted archers with lance
(MC impact or bowmen)
Thank you. This is interesting. "Row" in this co ... |
Sujet: Dismounting |
A4
Réponses: 7
Vus: 3918
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Dim Sep 10, 2023 6:22 pm Sujet: Dismounting |
See the 3rd bullet on p 21.
Thank you. Umpteen years and I'd never spotted that.
I don't remember ever encountering cav doing this. Is it in practice limited to a few lists?
Alan |
Sujet: Dismounting |
A4
Réponses: 7
Vus: 3918
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Sam Sep 09, 2023 2:42 am Sujet: Dismounting |
Same Box
#93 Visigoth
Nobles Mounted or on foot
These may freely dismount.
#93 Vandals
Nobles Mounted or on foot
These may freely dismount.
#90
Ancient Spanish.
Spanish Horsemen
Despit ... |
Sujet: Marches Constrained by Ambushes and Evaders |
A4
Réponses: 14
Vus: 14190
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Jeu Mar 23, 2023 5:59 pm Sujet: Marches Constrained by Ambushes and Evaders |
Hazelbark's point about the wording changing from v 3 would explain why I have experienced this played in different ways. Perhaps some have adjusted to the letter of the new ed, while others stick to ... |
Sujet: Marches Constrained by Ambushes and Evaders |
A4
Réponses: 14
Vus: 14190
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mar Mar 21, 2023 11:51 pm Sujet: Marches Constrained by Ambushes and Evaders |
Neep and Madaxeman - are you saying that a unit only cares about what's within 4 UD of it at the instant it starts to move (and then, of course, during its move)? So that it would not matter if an am ... |
Sujet: Marches Constrained by Ambushes and Evaders |
A4
Réponses: 14
Vus: 14190
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mar Mar 21, 2023 9:39 pm Sujet: Marches Constrained by Ambushes and Evaders |
Hazelbark, are you saying that a second (or march) move is prohibited in all these cases?
"all these cases" is an encompassing term.
A unit that starts outside of tactical and move ... |
Sujet: Marches Constrained by Ambushes and Evaders |
A4
Réponses: 14
Vus: 14190
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mar Mar 21, 2023 7:00 pm Sujet: Marches Constrained by Ambushes and Evaders |
Really good of you to reply so quickly.
Hope I am right in taking from all the replies that the rules treat a disappearing ambush marker and an evading enemy identically?
Hazelbark, by "n ... |
Sujet: Marches Constrained by Ambushes and Evaders |
A4
Réponses: 14
Vus: 14190
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mar Mar 21, 2023 1:25 am Sujet: Marches Constrained by Ambushes and Evaders |
A. Fake Ambushes
My Red command is the first to move. For its first pip a bunch of light infantry swarm towards an ambush marker and find that it is fake.
Hope I am right in thinking that the ... |
|