Auteur |
Message |
Sujet: Add Support in Army Lists |
Dazedmw
Réponses: 4
Vus: 969
|
Forum: Army lists Posté le: Sam Avr 30, 2022 4:22 am Sujet: Add Support in Army Lists |
A lot of us have left over LI from previous rules. But that can get cluttered. Someone on FB posted their options. After seeing others, I am using a half depth HI base with a single archer on it. It l ... |
Sujet: Impetuous Charge where enemy is 'missed' |
Dazedmw
Réponses: 14
Vus: 1748
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Sam Avr 30, 2022 3:23 am Sujet: Impetuous Charge where enemy is 'missed' |
Thanks all for the replies.
It seems counter-intuitive to me that a imp unit in range of an enemy can 'charge' and not end up in contact, and still be in a group with other friendly units that do e ... |
Sujet: Impetuous Charge where enemy is 'missed' |
Dazedmw
Réponses: 14
Vus: 1748
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Jeu Avr 28, 2022 11:54 am Sujet: Impetuous Charge where enemy is 'missed' |
Hi all,
Say there are 4 impetuous cav in a line (ABCD), one end of the line is facing an enemy at 2 UD (E1). There is another enemy slightly offset (not directly in front) at the other end of the l ... |
Sujet: Exiting a ZOC to the flank |
Dazedmw
Réponses: 4
Vus: 2963
|
Forum: Rules questions V3 Posté le: Mar Sep 03, 2019 12:37 pm Sujet: Exiting a ZOC to the flank |
In the situation where a (non evading) unit has a zone of control to its flank, it can exit to its rear without turning? At the cost of being disordered and 2CP.
It struck us as strange given if it ... |
Sujet: Warring States Chinese at 300 points |
Dazedmw
Réponses: 4
Vus: 6685
|
Forum: Army lists Posté le: Mer Mar 20, 2019 8:31 am Sujet: Warring States Chinese at 300 points |
Thanks, something to think about. |
Sujet: Warring States Chinese at 300 points |
Dazedmw
Réponses: 4
Vus: 6685
|
Forum: Army lists Posté le: Dim Mar 17, 2019 6:43 am Sujet: Warring States Chinese at 300 points |
"Any thoughts? "
I guess not then! |
Sujet: Warring States Chinese at 300 points |
Dazedmw
Réponses: 4
Vus: 6685
|
Forum: Army lists Posté le: Lun Mar 11, 2019 11:21 am Sujet: Warring States Chinese at 300 points |
So Cancon in Oz is 300 points next year which means either expanding a current army or starting a new one. The tournament is supposed to be themed at the first three periods.
My issue is I have har ... |
Sujet: Conforming and Fortifications |
Dazedmw
Réponses: 1
Vus: 2289
|
Forum: Rules questions V3 Posté le: Jeu Déc 27, 2018 11:28 am Sujet: Conforming and Fortifications |
Hi all,
Say a unit of Foot Knights (FKs) is adjacent to the end of a row of (friendly) fortifications. The enemy defeats the friendly unit defending the last fortification and then advances to the ... |
Sujet: Charge - stop in support? |
Dazedmw
Réponses: 11
Vus: 7786
|
Forum: Rules questions V3 Posté le: Dim Déc 09, 2018 9:51 am Sujet: Charge - stop in support? |
My take would be you end up something like this;
CCC
AA
.....CC
The cav that contacts the enemy stops where it can offer support. The cav that don't contact enemy have to complete their charge ... |
Sujet: Fortifications and 'Open' Terrain |
Dazedmw
Réponses: 7
Vus: 4869
|
Forum: Rules questions V3 Posté le: Sam Sep 01, 2018 7:50 am Sujet: Fortifications and 'Open' Terrain |
Thanks for that.
In a related question, if you play at a club where flank marches are common and you are worried about your march being driven back, what would be a 'safe' size? When people design ... |
Sujet: Fortifications and 'Open' Terrain |
Dazedmw
Réponses: 7
Vus: 4869
|
Forum: Rules questions V3 Posté le: Jeu Aoû 30, 2018 12:03 pm Sujet: Fortifications and 'Open' Terrain |
Hi guys,
A couple of questions from someone fairly new to the game.
A unit of LMI behind Fortifications vs Heavy Sword. Are the Heavy Sword at +2? The fortification rules state that LI contacte ... |
|