Art De La Guerre

But in this case Mike, I think we are all agreed, the pursuing Elephant is not the attacker, as it stops outside the terrain, not in it.
Mark

Sorry were do you get that from, I thought I clearl ...

This is the rule in ADLG you will be happy to know.
.

Unless rhe enemy is lining the edge of the terrain. Then, despite being fully outside, a unit can be disadvantaged if it was the attacker

If the enemy is lining the terrain edge (ie touching it) and the elephant stops when it reaches the terrain (ie also touching it) then why are they not in contact if they are parallel?

Then as th ...

I have some of Alains’s knight, I would need to dig them out and count up how many if you are interested. Possibly sone Byzantine’s too, but I think they were probably all painted and in use in ...

But in the case of the pursuing Elephant it cannot enter certain terrain without a penalty so it must stop before entering it - therefore it is not in it.

Agreed, but the elephant does not need to ...

I thought it was in a clarification or errata, but I cannot find it at the moment. Maybe I am imagining it, old age, or rugby bangs to the head, are a terrible thing for the mind

The literal wording says the pursuit is no longer mandatory, not that it must pursue some other distance. However, if it should then choose to make a non-mandatory pursuit it must go the full UD.“
...

.

Remember the rule/errata process:

1. EK writes in French
2. Google Translate to rough draft in new language
3. Inner sanctum of native speakers tweak the draft
4. Disagreements emerge betwe ...

.
However, if X was not in contact with B, and no CP were expended to stop or move elsewhere etc, then X would be compelled to charge B, resulting in the same conformation.

Thanks for the links ...

Hi Mike,

I asked a similar question before: https://www.artdelaguerre.fr/adlg/v3/forum/viewtopic.php?t=10467

The ruling was that due to the presence of both ZoCs nothing happened and the unit ...

Hi Mike,

I asked a similar question before: https://www.artdelaguerre.fr/adlg/v3/forum/viewtopic.php?t=10467

The ruling was that due to the presence of both ZoCs nothing happened and the unit ...

Yes, but this isn't "after melee". The unit has a chance to do something else.
I assume the question is about pursuit, which is only mandatory with impetuous and El, and would take some odd ...

Yes you would be in 2 zocs. One from the unit you are conforming too, which is the most threatening enemy, and another from the hard flank.

A and B facing up, C facing left versus X and Y facing d ...

Does anyone know where to find the rule allowing a unit not to conform after melee if it would end up with an enemy hard flanking it in in melee support?

Ps I can find it related to uncontrolled ch ...

It's probably worth reviewing the previous discussion here:

IMHO if we bring realism in, no unit making operational moves should get a road bonus. A road would be a few men wide at most. Useful f ...