Auteur |
Message |
Sujet: List 63 Thracian |
SteveR
Réponses: 2
Vus: 144
|
Forum: Army lists Posté le: Mer Avr 09, 2025 3:05 pm Sujet: List 63 Thracian |
You're probably correct.
Looks like the Getae are a mounted centric tribe that essentially swap the 0-4 medium cavalry and 4-8 lights with some bow for 0-4 medium cavalry bow and 4-8 bow lights ... |
Sujet: List 63 Thracian |
SteveR
Réponses: 2
Vus: 144
|
Forum: Army lists Posté le: Mer Avr 09, 2025 1:59 pm Sujet: List 63 Thracian |
It is not explicit in the list but it seems to me that the Getae should be counted as a lowland tribe.
However the alternative is that they are a tribe on their own and, unlike Odrysians, do not be ... |
Sujet: Conforming into a hard flank |
SteveR
Réponses: 28
Vus: 655
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Dim Avr 06, 2025 3:55 pm Sujet: Conforming into a hard flank |
I dont think you can find it because I dont think it exists. I might be wrong of course but this has been my understanding. You are exempted from an uncontrolled charge but not a conformation.
Th ... |
Sujet: Difficult Manoeuvre Pike/Cats |
SteveR
Réponses: 18
Vus: 699
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Jeu Mar 27, 2025 3:26 am Sujet: Difficult Manoeuvre Pike/Cats |
A wheel into a flank would need to be from a rather specific situation in which h your front edge is past the  adjacent enemy front, but only part way along their side edge to allow you to wheel ... |
Sujet: Missile support and armor bonuses cumulative |
SteveR
Réponses: 5
Vus: 195
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Lun Mar 24, 2025 6:39 pm Sujet: Missile support and armor bonuses cumulative |
Cumulative in this case means that both abilities are applied if both are applicable.
Each one requires that one has a score less than that of the enemy to be applied.
So if the application of ... |
Sujet: Furious charge, Armour & Missile support |
SteveR
Réponses: 67
Vus: 3471
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Sam Mar 08, 2025 9:18 pm Sujet: Furious charge, Armour & Missile support |
Well Mark, it's like this.
"I concur that that is the "widely held view" but my challenge is "why"? "
And the response to this challenge is "because that is ho ... |
Sujet: Furious charge, Armour & Missile support |
SteveR
Réponses: 67
Vus: 3471
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Ven Mar 07, 2025 7:56 pm Sujet: Furious charge, Armour & Missile support |
Hi Mark,
example A
"The 'widely held view' appears to be that No, Armour doesn't count as the attacker still has Furious charge (P17 Armour & heavy armour, 4th para, 1st bullet point)&q ... |
Sujet: Is a uncontrolled charge a real charge allways? |
SteveR
Réponses: 36
Vus: 2275
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mar Fév 25, 2025 3:48 am Sujet: Is a uncontrolled charge a real charge allways? |
This discussion has been very helpful to me.
Take a look at page 46. If I understand what everyone is saying unit D goes to a support position against unit 4 and must do so as a charge move. Beca ... |
Sujet: Types of contact |
SteveR
Réponses: 2
Vus: 250
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Lun Fév 24, 2025 3:54 pm Sujet: Types of contact |
Well, I have thought this issue through and asked about it some time past on here and am pleased to say that I THINK the answer I got was ....
Yes
Yes
At least this is how I play it now |
Sujet: Is a uncontrolled charge a real charge allways? |
SteveR
Réponses: 36
Vus: 2275
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Ven Fév 21, 2025 3:23 am Sujet: Is a uncontrolled charge a real charge allways? |
I think Lionel has answered this clearly, but even so it is a bit of a weird one:
- A unit making an Uncontrolled Charge always follows the Charge rules to determine how the unit moves acros ... |
Sujet: Hotlead, Ontario Canada March 22 |
SteveR
Réponses: 2
Vus: 166
|
Forum: Tournaments and Events Posté le: Jeu Fév 20, 2025 4:08 am Sujet: Hotlead, Ontario Canada March 22 |
I look forward to meeting you there! |
Sujet: War Wagons and Support (Questions) |
SteveR
Réponses: 4
Vus: 265
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mer Fév 12, 2025 4:26 am Sujet: War Wagons and Support (Questions) |
Hi Mark,
In your latest examples A and B you are correct for each. The rule is explicit - to provide simple support in the flank to flank case the friend must be fighting on the front or rear edge ... |
Sujet: War Wagons and Support (Questions) |
SteveR
Réponses: 4
Vus: 265
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mar Fév 11, 2025 12:46 am Sujet: War Wagons and Support (Questions) |
Q1 = Yes
Q2 = No
Q3 = Not only no, but you are reading way too much into it. The second WWG does not count at all
Q4 = No
Q5 = Yes
Q6 = No. "Overlapping" a unit in simple su ... |
Sujet: List 121 Three Kingdoms Korean |
SteveR
Réponses: 7
Vus: 261
|
Forum: Army lists Posté le: Jeu Fév 06, 2025 12:36 am Sujet: List 121 Three Kingdoms Korean |
That’s the part I’m not sure about. I think (but am by no means sure) the note here overrides the instruction on p 87, 3rd bullet.
I'm pretty sure. If the list required minimum is 4, sayin ... |
Sujet: List 121 Three Kingdoms Korean |
SteveR
Réponses: 7
Vus: 261
|
Forum: Army lists Posté le: Mer Fév 05, 2025 3:21 pm Sujet: List 121 Three Kingdoms Korean |
The note on allies (must contain at least 2 provincial or militia) is interesting. Does this mean you can take any 2 and that these then count as your 1 minimums for all 4 types of provincial and ... |
|