Auteur |
Message |
Sujet: Wheeling during an evade |
elsleyra
Réponses: 10
Vus: 693
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Dim Sep 29, 2024 9:58 am Sujet: Wheeling during an evade |
I am surprise at the view (shared apparently by at least Neep and KevinD) that difficult terrain should be treated as impassable by evading chariots. The definition of Impassable terrain (as a type o ... |
Sujet: Wheeling during an evade |
elsleyra
Réponses: 10
Vus: 693
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mar Sep 24, 2024 11:16 pm Sujet: Wheeling during an evade |
1 certainly applies as the rule is written. I think we can agree on that.
Thanks Dan.
I was coming from the point of view of trying to understand the diagram on p49, reconciling it with the poi ... |
Sujet: Wheeling during an evade |
elsleyra
Réponses: 10
Vus: 693
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mar Sep 24, 2024 4:29 am Sujet: Wheeling during an evade |
'5 – Evade move' (p48) states
“If during the evade move, the unit encounters a new obstacle in its way it must try to manoeuvre to avoid or interpenetrate it. The manoeuvre is done when it arriv ... |
Sujet: Sliding to reduce evade distance |
elsleyra
Réponses: 34
Vus: 2049
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Lun Sep 23, 2024 4:25 am Sujet: Sliding to reduce evade distance |
As per the title of this thread, the original post was actually about whether or not an evading unit may execute a slide of up to 1UD in order to finish short of an extended obstacle. Much of the su ... |
Sujet: Sliding to reduce evade distance |
elsleyra
Réponses: 34
Vus: 2049
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Ven Sep 20, 2024 1:35 am Sujet: Sliding to reduce evade distance |
This is a ‘chicken & egg’ or ‘catch22’ style problem.Â
When evading, the unit must move its maximum adjusted distance, which may be reduced by passing through terrain.
As soon as the ... |
Sujet: Sliding to reduce evade distance |
elsleyra
Réponses: 34
Vus: 2049
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Jeu Sep 19, 2024 1:27 am Sujet: Sliding to reduce evade distance |
Correct. As Neep says, because the movement allowance is reduced by terrain, the unit is deemed to have moved its full allowance.Â
Â
Does this mean that the evaders are treated as in the slowing ... |
Sujet: Sliding to reduce evade distance |
elsleyra
Réponses: 34
Vus: 2049
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Jeu Sep 19, 2024 12:20 am Sujet: Sliding to reduce evade distance |
... With respect to interpretation, P39 states
If the movement distance is too short to cross the unit at least partially, or if there is not enough space to adjust the positions of the units involve ... |
Sujet: Sliding to reduce evade distance |
elsleyra
Réponses: 34
Vus: 2049
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Jeu Sep 19, 2024 12:14 am Sujet: Sliding to reduce evade distance |
Correct. As Neep says, because the movement allowance is reduced by terrain, the unit is deemed to have moved its full allowance.Â
Â
Does this mean that the evaders are treated as in the slowing ... |
Sujet: Sliding to reduce evade distance |
elsleyra
Réponses: 34
Vus: 2049
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mar Sep 17, 2024 10:45 pm Sujet: Sliding to reduce evade distance |
No. As KevinD says, evading units may not avoid terrain that penalizes its adjusted move distance.Â
The unit may only change its direction to avoid an obstacle (P48) After any change in orientation, ... |
Sujet: Sliding to reduce evade distance |
elsleyra
Réponses: 34
Vus: 2049
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mar Sep 17, 2024 9:56 am Sujet: Sliding to reduce evade distance |
No, I don’t think so. Evaders do not avoid terrain that slows them. They only deviate around terrain they are prohibited from entering, such as impassable, flooded rivers or chariots into difficult. ... |
Sujet: Sliding to reduce evade distance |
elsleyra
Réponses: 34
Vus: 2049
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mar Sep 17, 2024 12:38 am Sujet: Sliding to reduce evade distance |
The group AABBB chooses to evade to its rear. To its rear is an obstacle shown as 112233445566 - either units AABB is unable to interpenetrate or terrain that AABB doesn’t have sufficient adjusted e ... |
Sujet: Conformation |
elsleyra
Réponses: 4
Vus: 915
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Jeu Nov 09, 2023 9:20 am Sujet: Conformation |
Starting position - A belongs to one player, B & C to the other
A facing down the page, B and C facing up the page (ie A and B in corner to corner contact, C on A's flank but some distance away) ... |
Sujet: exiting a ZOC - choice of orientation? |
elsleyra
Réponses: 39
Vus: 3590
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Lun Jan 09, 2023 6:12 am Sujet: exiting a ZOC - choice of orientation? |
I think most of the uncertainty that gave rise to, or was exposed by, this thread came from reorientation being driven by the ZoC rather than by the most threatening enemy per se.
If the errata not ... |
Sujet: exiting a ZOC - choice of orientation? |
elsleyra
Réponses: 39
Vus: 3590
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Ven Déc 16, 2022 10:37 pm Sujet: exiting a ZOC - choice of orientation? |
Firstly, many thanks to the various contributors above. Much of my confusion on this matter has now been addressed.
From here I’ll just note that I think we need to be careful re the interpretat ... |
Sujet: exiting a ZOC - choice of orientation? |
elsleyra
Réponses: 39
Vus: 3590
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Ven Déc 16, 2022 9:59 am Sujet: exiting a ZOC - choice of orientation? |
@ Zoltan - Agreed. However the evasion process is the same for each.
When retreating to exit a ZoC, p.37 (official errata amendment) says, "A unit that attempts to evade when it has an enem ... |
|