Auteur |
Message |
daveallen
Tribun

Inscrit le: 28 Jan 2016 Messages: 758
Localisation: Rugby & CLWC
|
Posté le: Lun Mai 10, 2021 7:51 am Sujet du message: Liste 88 les démonteurs |
|
Are the foederati (mounted & on foot) considered to be in the same row for the purpose of dismounting?
Page 21, 2nd paragraph, 3rd bullet point
Les foederati (montés et à pied) sont-ils considérés comme étant dans la même rangée aux fins du démontage?
Page 21, 2ème paragraphe, 3ème puce
Merci,
Dave _________________ Putting the ink into incompetence |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
thierry
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 22 Nov 2008 Messages: 4712
Localisation: val d'oise (France)
|
Posté le: Lun Mai 10, 2021 7:59 am Sujet du message: |
|
Hi Dave
In the endnote (p142) it says:
"mounted feoderati may dismount as impetuous heavy infantry with 3pts of cohesion and with armour if heavy cavalry" _________________ Le jour est proche où nous n’aurons plus que “l’impôt†sur les os. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
daveallen
Tribun

Inscrit le: 28 Jan 2016 Messages: 758
Localisation: Rugby & CLWC
|
Posté le: Lun Mai 10, 2021 8:18 am Sujet du message: |
|
thierry a écrit: | Hi Dave
In the endnote (p142) it says:
"mounted feoderati may dismount as impetuous heavy infantry with 3pts of cohesion and with armour if heavy cavalry" |
Thank you Thierry.
The problem is about getting the "free" dismount like some Knights.
The "Mounted" and "on foot" foederates are in two boxes.
Page 21 says Knights and Cavalry in the same row can dismount without the opponent having elephants, etc.
So, are there two boxes in one row or is each box a row?
I know this sounds silly, but you know what they say about two English wargamers having an argument...
they will have five different positions
Dave _________________ Putting the ink into incompetence
Dernière édition par daveallen le Lun Mai 10, 2021 8:21 am; édité 1 fois |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
daveallen
Tribun

Inscrit le: 28 Jan 2016 Messages: 758
Localisation: Rugby & CLWC
|
Posté le: Lun Mai 10, 2021 8:20 am Sujet du message: |
|
PS
Also, it does not look like the way the Visigoth list treats Nobles. _________________ Putting the ink into incompetence |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
thierry
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 22 Nov 2008 Messages: 4712
Localisation: val d'oise (France)
|
Posté le: Lun Mai 10, 2021 9:39 am Sujet du message: |
|
I understand, but here, the dismount of the mounted feoderati is clearly indicated and specified in the notes p142 -> heavy infantry and not medium infantry
No choice.  _________________ Le jour est proche où nous n’aurons plus que “l’impôt†sur les os. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
daveallen
Tribun

Inscrit le: 28 Jan 2016 Messages: 758
Localisation: Rugby & CLWC
|
Posté le: Lun Mai 10, 2021 10:13 am Sujet du message: |
|
thierry a écrit: | I understand, but here, the dismount of the mounted feoderati is clearly indicated and specified in the notes p142 -> heavy infantry and not medium infantry
No choice.  |
That isn't the problem Thierry, but thank you for replying anyway.
Your opponent does not deploy any obstacles, fortifications, Elephants, War Wagons, or units with stakes.
If you have a Visigoth army (#93) your Noble Cavalry can dismount.
If you have a Patrician army (#88 ) can your Foederate Cavalry also dismount?
As per Page 21, "Conditions for dismounting", bullet point 3:
Citation: | Medium and heavy knight units as well as some cavalry can also dismount if their army list allows deploying these units on foot. Mounted and foot units must be listed in the same row. |
Are "Mounted foederati" and "Foederati on foot" in the same row? _________________ Putting the ink into incompetence |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Brave Coeur
Tribun

Inscrit le: 06 Oct 2011 Messages: 800
Localisation: Strasbourg/Paris
|
Posté le: Lun Mai 10, 2021 11:55 am Sujet du message: |
|
As I can see in the patrician list, there is a black thin line that splits the mounted from the foot version.
This means 2 boxes.
Hope to be helpful.
Brave coeur _________________ Space Rookie |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
daveallen
Tribun

Inscrit le: 28 Jan 2016 Messages: 758
Localisation: Rugby & CLWC
|
Posté le: Lun Mai 10, 2021 12:36 pm Sujet du message: |
|
That makes sense certainly, but at the same time they are included together in the same row as shown by a single shade* and by the number of units allowed.
* notice how the rows are shaded alternately white and pink(?)
Dave
PS I don't have a Patrician army  _________________ Putting the ink into incompetence |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
madaxeman
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 01 Nov 2014 Messages: 1599
Localisation: Londres Centraal.
|
Posté le: Lun Mai 10, 2021 12:51 pm Sujet du message: |
|
The shading alternates simply to help with reading the tables.
 I don’t think it’s part of the syntax of the lists ! _________________ www.madaxeman.com |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Mike Bennett
Légat
Inscrit le: 11 Nov 2017 Messages: 583
Localisation: Carnforth, Lancashire, UK
|
Posté le: Lun Mai 10, 2021 1:17 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Autoriser les deux ne serait pas une interprétation raisonable. Normalement, ils sont les mêmes gars qui avaient des manières différentes de combattre selon les circonstances. Ce sont des types différents. Et je pourrais faire des patriciens.
Allowing dismounts would be an unreasonable interpretation. Normally they are the same guys who had different ways of fighting depending on circumstances. These are different guys. And I could do patricians. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Ramses II
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015 Messages: 1237
Localisation: London
|
Posté le: Lun Mai 10, 2021 9:30 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Dave, The foederati (mounted and on foot) in list #88 Patrician Roman are considered to be separate 'rows' as far as dismounting is concerned. The note at the foot of the list re-defines how the mounted foederati dismount, usually impetuous cavalry dismount as spearmen but here they become Impetuous Swordsmen.
Note the "Navarrese and Gascon knights" and the "French knights" in #240 Kingdom of Navarre as two examples of being "in the same row", and hence being able to dismount voluntarily (per the third bullet point of Conditions for dismounting p17)
And to answer the other point, the mounted foederati and foot foederati are a single colour (pink in this case) because the player may only have a total of 4-12 of these foederati units. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
hcaille
Administrateur

Inscrit le: 20 Mai 2008 Messages: 2547
Localisation: Lyon
|
Posté le: Ven Mai 14, 2021 5:26 am Sujet du message: |
|
To be consistent will all other "Barbarian" lists, mounted foederati dismount as stated in the notes.
If you take it as foot, they can be Impetuous MI or HI as indicated in the list. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
lionelrus
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2009 Messages: 4804
Localisation: paris
|
Posté le: Dim Mai 16, 2021 12:57 pm Sujet du message: |
|
daveallen a écrit: | That makes sense certainly, but at the same time they are included together in the same row as shown by a single shade* and by the number of units allowed.
* notice how the rows are shaded alternately white and pink(?)
Dave
PS I don't have a Patrician army  |
They are NOT in the same row. To see example of same row, see ie french knight in medieval french list. And you perfectly know you're wrong, Dave....  _________________ "Quand on a pas de technique, faut y aller à la zob"
Perceval à Yvain et Gauvain. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
daveallen
Tribun

Inscrit le: 28 Jan 2016 Messages: 758
Localisation: Rugby & CLWC
|
Posté le: Mar Mai 18, 2021 10:21 am Sujet du message: |
|
lionelrus a écrit: | They are NOT in the same row. To see example of same row, see ie french knight in medieval french list. And you perfectly know you're wrong, Dave....  |
All I did was ask for a clarification. Was that so wrong of me? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Dave _________________ Putting the ink into incompetence |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
|