Art De La Guerre
Bienvenue sur le forum de discussion de la règle de jeu l'Art De La Guerre
 
FAQFAQ RechercherRechercher Liste des MembresListe des Membres Groupes d'utilisateursGroupes d'utilisateurs S'enregistrerS'enregistrer
ProfilProfil Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés ConnexionConnexion
Charge Process revised
Page 3 sur 3 Aller à la page Précédente  1, 2, 3
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules question V4
Auteur Message
Za Otlichiye
Signifer


Inscrit le: 07 Sep 2021
Messages: 341
Localisation: Lovecraft country (and you Dan?)
MessagePosté le: Mer Juil 06, 2022 11:32 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Well in RII's defense, taken literally, "the initial target" would be just that - the first enemy unit struck by a charge movement.

Our collective problem is that we don't have a reliable process to nail these things down.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Ramses II
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015
Messages: 1160
Localisation: London
MessagePosté le: Mer Juil 06, 2022 11:54 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Hazelbark a écrit:
Ramses II a écrit:
As I said originally, I posted this because it has become clear that some people were unaware of this subtle but important change in the rules. And I must apologize; I used the term "single target" for simplicity. In practice this is the unit or units that will be contacted first simultaneously (ie without passing through any enemy units). We then use Steps #5, #6 or #7 to determine how the chargers move and conform etc.

Using your example, usually either a or b will be contacted first and thus become the Initial Target with the results you describe. However, where they are exactly the same distance from the chargers, I agree that they both become the Initial Target. (For example this might occur where a-b was originally a group of units but one or more have been destroyed by shooting).


You are bringing in this simultaneously, which i get you are trying to explain things to people, but that is not correct.


123456 Charge as group. They all have the same direction. Essentially by definition they are going to have different targets. Now a 3 wide group could have a single target assuming no ZOCs around. But essentially if there is a target that cannot evade in front of 1, then no one will VMD. The group will then travel its normal move with no VMD.


NO, this is specifically not what is written in Step #1
Using your example, there is a group of 6x units. If they charge forwards as a single group (see P10), they must remain a group until contact is made when the charge stops (see P42 Charge definition). If this means the group contacts the advanced LC first, that unit becomes the Initial Target of the group because the group will not be able to contact other enemy without ‘passing through enemy units’, ie the enemy LC.

However, once the first contact and conformation is made, some of the chargers may follow step #8 Continuing a Charge P43, potentially moving into contact with Secondary Targets (P44) beyond the Initial Target. 

Basically this achieves what you describe, but in two stages. 
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Mike Bennett
Centurion


Inscrit le: 11 Nov 2017
Messages: 489
Localisation: Carnforth, Lancashire, UK
MessagePosté le: Jeu Juil 07, 2022 5:13 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Ramses II a écrit:


NO, this is specifically not what is written in Step #1
Using your example, there is a group of 6x units. If they charge forwards as a single group (see P10), they must remain a group until contact is made when the charge stops (see P42 Charge definition). If this means the group contacts the advanced LC first, that unit becomes the Initial Target of the group because the group will not be able to contact other enemy without ‘passing through enemy units’, ie the enemy LC.

However, once the first contact and conformation is made, some of the chargers may follow step #8 Continuing a Charge P43, potentially moving into contact with Secondary Targets (P44) beyond the Initial Target. 

Basically this achieves what you describe, but in two stages. 


If I have this right I have the impression that consensus has effectively been reached, with both arguments giving the same result. The only differences seem to be phraseology.

 A
……B

 123456

Group 1 to 6 declares a charge straight forward with both A and B as initial target. Both can be targeted as there is no need to pass through any enemy unit to contact each of them.

Case 1;If B stands then Gavin has argued that they become the initial target as they were hit first. In this case, even if A is not the initial target, it is irrelevant. The units that do not contact B can continue their charge to contact A. This does not require a variable move roll.

Case 2; if on the other hand B evades, then the argument about B being the target as they were hit target first drops away. Then the entitire group 1-6 continues on until A is contacted, again without a variable movement dice roll as they are the remaining initial target.

Nb in both cases A can be contacted without “passing through enemy unitsâ€, thereby satisfying the rules as noted in these posts.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Ramses II
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015
Messages: 1160
Localisation: London
MessagePosté le: Jeu Juil 07, 2022 11:04 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Not quite Mike LoL  Very Happy

If group 1-6 intend to go straight up the page they would hit B first. So, according to Step #1, only B is declared the Initial Target, because the entire group would stop moving upon contacting it. The players then go through the steps with respect to the Chargers and the Initial Target (B here). After this some units may Continue their Charge, which may indeed result in some charging units contacting Secondary Targets (A here) causing them to react etc. 

Guys, basically the V4 rules have been revised to clear up the Charge Process by defining the steps and introducing the term Initial Target. This helps clarify and simplify charge movement and conformation. 

However, now this may result in the Chargers being required to make a Variable Movement Roll if the Initial Target completely evades. That is all we need to consider. 

 
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Mike Bennett
Centurion


Inscrit le: 11 Nov 2017
Messages: 489
Localisation: Carnforth, Lancashire, UK
MessagePosté le: Jeu Juil 07, 2022 11:19 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Thanks for highlighting the changes in step #1, and the requirement for a variable movement die roll for a revealed target behind an evader. Unfortunately without specific rules wording I do not see consensus on the extension of the variable move roll. Unless that is made, and communicated to everyone, through an errata / faq there is likely to be inconsistency.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
muz177
Gladiateur


Inscrit le: 21 Jan 2018
Messages: 43
MessagePosté le: Dim Juil 17, 2022 12:01 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
I still don't understand the different terminology of 'the initial target' and then in points 5-7 the use of 'all initial targets'.
Points 1 to 3 just talk about a singular target. I can see what Dan is saying, in that each unit in a group may have a single initial target. So when talking about a group, rather than a unit, then the plural makes sense.
But RII explanation appears to limit each charging unit to just one target.

So does this mean that each unit in a group may specify the initial target which applies to them, or is a group limited to one initial target, the same as an individual unit?
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
KevinD
Légat


Inscrit le: 23 Aoû 2021
Messages: 500
Localisation: Texas
MessagePosté le: Dim Juil 17, 2022 12:11 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
As I understand it, there will be one initial target for a charging group, but that target might consist of multiple enemy units or groups.

The initial target is all those enemy units the charging group will first hit. For example if a line charges an enemy line without wheeling and both lines are parallel then the enemy units are all the initial target. If, on the other hand, the lines are not parallel (perhaps because the chargers wheel out of a parallel alignment as they started their charge) or the enemy’s front does not form a line, then only the first enemy unit the chargers hit will be the initial target.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Zoltan
Centurion


Inscrit le: 18 Jan 2015
Messages: 443
Localisation: Wellington, New Zealand
MessagePosté le: Dim Juil 17, 2022 10:12 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
KevinD a écrit:
….. If, on the other hand, the lines are not parallel (perhaps because the chargers wheel out of a parallel alignment as they started their charge) or the enemy’s front does not form a line, then only the first enemy unit the chargers hit will be the initial target.


No that’s just silly! Each enemy unit that would be hit by each charging unit needs to be considered that charging unit’s initial target.  
 
123456

ABCDEF

Numbers charge letters as a group, and the two lines are NOT perfectly parallel. A is closer to 1 than F is to 6 etc.
 
Just because A elects to evade as a single unit shouldn’t mean that the whole group 123456 rolls a VMD. 23456 still have initial targets that have not evaded. If BCDEF decide to stand 123456 should automatically make contact with them. It would be ludicrous for 123456 to roll a VMD as a group (just because A chose to evade) only to find they roll down and can’t reach BCDEF.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
SteveR
Prétorien


Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2018
Messages: 284
MessagePosté le: Dim Juil 17, 2022 3:13 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Zoltan a écrit:


No that’s just silly! Each enemy unit that would be hit by each charging unit needs to be considered that charging unit’s initial target.  



I certainly thought of it that way at first however the rule makes no sense if you look at it that way.

Which would be silly.

The rule makes sense if you consider the unit you will contact first as the initial target.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Zoltan
Centurion


Inscrit le: 18 Jan 2015
Messages: 443
Localisation: Wellington, New Zealand
MessagePosté le: Dim Juil 17, 2022 7:28 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
The rule makes sense when you consider each charging unit’s targets. A given charger may have more than 1 target within its charge path and normal charge distance.

C

T1

T2

Under v3, C didn’t need to roll a VMD unless T1 and T2 both evaded (“all the targets in its charge pathâ€).

Under v4, if T1 (“initial targetâ€) evades C rolls a VMD. If it rolls down it may not even reach T2. So if T2 is evade-capable it may not need to decide whether or not to evade. Similarly, if T2 is not evade-capable, C may not reach it due to the low VMD reducing its normal charge move distance.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
  
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules question V4
Page 3 sur 3 Aller à la page Précédente  1, 2, 3
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet Toutes les heures sont au format GMT

 
Sauter vers:  
Vous ne pouvez pas poster de nouveaux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas éditer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas supprimer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas voter dans les sondages de ce forum