Art De La Guerre
Bienvenue sur le forum de discussion de la règle de jeu l'Art De La Guerre
 
FAQFAQ RechercherRechercher Liste des MembresListe des Membres Groupes d'utilisateursGroupes d'utilisateurs S'enregistrerS'enregistrer
ProfilProfil Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés ConnexionConnexion
Disengaging and Exiting a ZoC
Page 1 sur 1
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules question V4
Auteur Message
vexillia
Centurion


Inscrit le: 21 Nov 2017
Messages: 408
Localisation: Nantwich, UK
MessagePosté le: Mar Sep 12, 2023 8:32 am    Sujet du message: Disengaging and Exiting a ZoC Répondre en citant
Cases to consider:
1. A unit that cannot evade, pivots (if necessary) and moves straight back out of a ZoC.
2. Mounted with ZoC of slower unit to its rear moves straight ahead a full move.
3. A unit without another enemy ZoC to it's rear disengages from combat by moving to its rear 1 or 2 UD.

Rules:
For 1 the rules say stop when meeting a new enemy but the stopping distance isn't defined.
The rules for 2 are silent on both contact & stopping distance.
For 3 the unit cannot contact a new enemy but the stopping distance isn't defined.

Issues
Is there contact with cases 1 & 2? If they don't contact the enemy how far away do they stop?
If there is contact, does it result in combat and if so when?
With 3, how far away do they stop?

Question
Is something like "stopping 1UD from new enemy or friends it can't interpenetrate" currently missing and required?

Thanks.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé Visiter le site web de l'utilisateur
vexillia
Centurion


Inscrit le: 21 Nov 2017
Messages: 408
Localisation: Nantwich, UK
MessagePosté le: Mar Sep 12, 2023 11:15 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
An alternative view of the same issue that may be easier to understand:

I think there's a general issue pertaining to "avoidance" moves that isn't covered by the evade rules.

When evading, the move ends when the unit "arrives within 1 UD of [an] obstacle or the minimum more than 1 UD if a wheel is required" (p48). It isn't that clear, but I assume the obstacle in question is one that can't be avoided.

With the other complex moves the situation is different.

[1] Non-evaders leaving a ZoC must stop when they meet an obstacle (includes enemy units) (p37).
[2] The special rule for Mounted in a ZoC to their rear is silent on contacting enemy or obstacles during the move.
[3] Disengaging units "may not contact any enemy" (p40) but the stopping distance isn't specified.

Apart from the inconsistency, it raises further questions:

[1] When stopping after exiting a ZoC is there contact with the enemy (or obstacle)? If not how far away does it stop?
[2] Does the answer to [1] apply to mounted moving away from a ZoC to their rear?
[3] How far away for enemy units do disengaging units stop?

It's all a bit messy. Perhaps all that's required is a blanket rule along the lines of "stopping 1 UD from new enemy or friends it can't interpenetrate" is required?
_________________
Martin Stephenson

Subscribe via email or rss.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé Visiter le site web de l'utilisateur
Hazelbark
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014
Messages: 1669
MessagePosté le: Mar Sep 12, 2023 1:39 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
vexillia a écrit:


Rules:
For 1 the rules say stop when meeting a new enemy but the stopping distance isn't defined.
The rules for 2 are silent on both contact & stopping distance.
For 3 the unit cannot contact a new enemy but the stopping distance isn't defined.
.


Use the LI stopping before a unit it cannot contact from p42. "just before" meaning a few millimeters
Special case does not override last bullet of units that cannot evade which prohibits contact.

Further there is a general rule on p41 about contacting enemy and things like evading and exiting ZoC are not listed. In short, contact must be wilful.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
SteveR
Signifer


Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2018
Messages: 369
MessagePosté le: Mar Sep 12, 2023 1:42 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
I am not following you.

Can you explain why you think the evade move "ends" when the unit arrives within one UD of an obstacle?

I think this premise is flawed. Take a look at the diagram on page 49 showing an evade. See how the LH moves to avoid the obstacle.

If the obstacle cannot be avoided the unit must stop.

It may contact evading enemy LI. It may not contact the camp.

Presumably it may not contact other enemy units.

If the obstacle is friendly and cannot be avoided it just stops in contact
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Hazelbark
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014
Messages: 1669
MessagePosté le: Mar Sep 12, 2023 1:42 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
vexillia a écrit:


It's all a bit messy. Perhaps all that's required is a blanket rule along the lines of "stopping 1 UD from new enemy or friends it can't interpenetrate" is required?


No. The 1 UD gap would create many more opportunities for issues as that effects things like ZOC.

Until further notice, use "just before". English prefer Gnat's todger and all that jazz. I do not recall this ever being a necessary umpire intervention to define "just before"
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
hcaille
Administrateur


Inscrit le: 20 Mai 2008
Messages: 2547
Localisation: Lyon
MessagePosté le: Jeu Sep 14, 2023 7:03 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Hello

For all the cases that specify "just before contact", the unit must stop a few milimeters before the contact.

In the evade move, the unit can react 1 UD before the obstacle because it allow the unit to pivot to avoid the obstacle.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé Envoyer un e-mail Visiter le site web de l'utilisateur
vexillia
Centurion


Inscrit le: 21 Nov 2017
Messages: 408
Localisation: Nantwich, UK
MessagePosté le: Jeu Sep 14, 2023 7:27 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Thanks Herve. One more issue (isn't there always?) ...

A mounted unit (that can evade) is in the ZoC of a slower unit to their rear wishes to exit the ZoC. Do they:

[1] Evade,
[2] Apply the special case rule,
[3] Or does the player have a choice?

Answers on a postcard please.
_________________
Martin Stephenson

Subscribe via email or rss.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé Visiter le site web de l'utilisateur
Neep
Prétorien


Inscrit le: 09 Jan 2023
Messages: 298
MessagePosté le: Jeu Sep 14, 2023 5:18 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
I'm pretty sure the special case only applies to mounted that cannot evade.
Evading is generally more flexible, _except_ you must evade off the table edge, but when "exiting" you get to (muist) stop at the edge.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
hcaille
Administrateur


Inscrit le: 20 Mai 2008
Messages: 2547
Localisation: Lyon
MessagePosté le: Sam Sep 16, 2023 7:31 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
If the unit can Evade, it does an evade move
The units that cannot evade apply the special rule for exiting the ZoC
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé Envoyer un e-mail Visiter le site web de l'utilisateur
vexillia
Centurion


Inscrit le: 21 Nov 2017
Messages: 408
Localisation: Nantwich, UK
MessagePosté le: Sam Sep 16, 2023 7:37 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Sorted. Thanks Herve.
_________________
Martin Stephenson

Subscribe via email or rss.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé Visiter le site web de l'utilisateur
KevinD
Légat


Inscrit le: 23 Aoû 2021
Messages: 646
Localisation: Texas
MessagePosté le: Sam Sep 16, 2023 3:44 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
hcaille a écrit:
If the unit can Evade, it does an evade move
The units that cannot evade apply the special rule for exiting the ZoC


Hmmm…. Thanks for clarifying this.

Last time this came up Hazelbark said all mounted (Evaders and Non-Evaders) had to use the Special Rule if they could while Ramses II said Evaders “may†evade - I took his may to mean he thought they had a choice to move straight or evade. (The Special Rule straight ahead might sometimes be more desirable than evade as it is a known (non-random) distance, avoids exiting table issues and does prohibit shooting. Of course evade has other potential positives.)

See http://www.artdelaguerre.fr/adlg/v3/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9334&highlight=zoc
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Hazelbark
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014
Messages: 1669
MessagePosté le: Sam Sep 16, 2023 5:29 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Well its solved. Sometimes we try to be helpful while El Kreator is busy.

We are mere apostles and imperfect.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Neep
Prétorien


Inscrit le: 09 Jan 2023
Messages: 298
MessagePosté le: Dim Sep 17, 2023 7:49 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Kevin, I believe shooting is prohibited in either case.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
  
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules question V4
Page 1 sur 1
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet Toutes les heures sont au format GMT

 
Sauter vers:  
Vous ne pouvez pas poster de nouveaux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas éditer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas supprimer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas voter dans les sondages de ce forum