Art De La Guerre
Bienvenue sur le forum de discussion de la règle de jeu l'Art De La Guerre
 
FAQFAQ RechercherRechercher Liste des MembresListe des Membres Groupes d'utilisateursGroupes d'utilisateurs S'enregistrerS'enregistrer
ProfilProfil Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés ConnexionConnexion
Multiple Opponents pg59
Page 1 sur 1
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules questions V3
Auteur Message
stuuk
Gladiateur


Inscrit le: 21 Déc 2014
Messages: 32
MessagePosté le: Ven Jan 16, 2015 12:41 am    Sujet du message: Multiple Opponents pg59 Répondre en citant
It seems that a unit supporting a combat could move in its movement phase to take advantage of this rule if it is not engaged to its front and attack the enemy to its flank, is that correct?

However, a flank charge is only possible if some part of the units base starts behind the front of the enemy which it would not if the unit were previously supporting, so I'm unsure what this rule means.. anyone?..
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
kerrakoze
Barbare


Inscrit le: 04 Jan 2015
Messages: 23
MessagePosté le: Ven Jan 16, 2015 8:13 am    Sujet du message: Re: Multiple Opponents pg59 Répondre en citant
stuuk a écrit:
It seems that a unit supporting a combat could move in its movement phase to take advantage of this rule if it is not engaged to its front and attack the enemy to its flank, is that correct?

This is VERY correct. It's how you will truly exploit a numerical superiority or a hole in the enemy line.
Two units in order. Let's say base factors are +1 vs +1.
With support it's +2 vs +1
Flanked it's +2 vs -1 (0 base factor -1 disordered)

stuuk a écrit:
However, a flank charge is only possible if some part of the units base starts behind the front of the enemy which it would not if the unit were previously supporting, so I'm unsure what this rule means.. anyone?..

You are right in the case of a corner to corner support, but you can also support flank against flank.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
sebastosfig
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 04 Oct 2008
Messages: 1092
Localisation: Lisboa
MessagePosté le: Ven Jan 16, 2015 9:04 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
A unit can give support when:
- in contact corner to corner
- or in flank to flank contact.

in the latter case, you can then turn and flank him.
_________________
C'est un Germain Breton, il faut pas le secouer trop fort, meme s'il le demande.

http://backtotheminis.blogspot.com
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé Visiter le site web de l'utilisateur
chris6
Vétéran


Inscrit le: 02 Déc 2013
Messages: 198
MessagePosté le: Ven Jan 16, 2015 10:00 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Wait a minute...

As far as I see the rules its not that easy. It will take 2 of your own phases to get the flankattack.

In your example we have one unit supporting the other so they have to be in corner to corner AND aligned. This means the supporting unit can NOT turn to make a flankattack because its not behind the frontline o fthe enemy.

But the sup.unit can advance a little, costs and CP, now it is still supporting the mainfightingunit because it is in side to side contact with the enemy fighting to its front.

In your next turn, not in the enemys!, the sup. unit can turn to make the flankattack, and the enemy will loose his fighting factor and a cohesion.

But all this takes 2 of your own phases and only happens if no other unit gets in contact with your sup. unit or exerts a ZOC to it.
_________________
Wohnort Limburg 30 Km nördlich von Frankfurt
Living at Limburg 30 Km north of Frankfurt
lieu de résidence Limburg 30 Km nord de Frankfurt
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
sebastosfig
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 04 Oct 2008
Messages: 1092
Localisation: Lisboa
MessagePosté le: Ven Jan 16, 2015 10:04 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Of course you are right. You need two of your mouvement phases to do that. Wink
_________________
C'est un Germain Breton, il faut pas le secouer trop fort, meme s'il le demande.

http://backtotheminis.blogspot.com
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé Visiter le site web de l'utilisateur
stuuk
Gladiateur


Inscrit le: 21 Déc 2014
Messages: 32
MessagePosté le: Ven Jan 16, 2015 10:49 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Thanks for the clarifications.

What is the reference to conforming about?
"[the supporting unit] can engage [in] the melee with a simple move, or by conforming if it was already in contact"

Clearly in the case we are discussing, the unit is supporting and in contact with the enemy - but I don't know why it would be able to conform?..
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
chris6
Vétéran


Inscrit le: 02 Déc 2013
Messages: 198
MessagePosté le: Ven Jan 16, 2015 1:45 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Which rule you are talking about here? Site? Bulletpoint?

BTW thats all true: A unit can engage into combat, or better move into a position to support the mainunit by spending a CP. In this case the unit you wants to move did not have any contact with the enemy.

Second, if the unit was already in contact with the enemyunit, probably touching the sideedge with its frontage after a following threw where its destroyed another unit, but not properly aligned corner to corner and frontedge to sideedge, it now can conform to the enemy it is touching by conforming in its own phase.

Pooohhh....i guess i am reaching the frontlines of my english abilities here... Embarassed
_________________
Wohnort Limburg 30 Km nördlich von Frankfurt
Living at Limburg 30 Km north of Frankfurt
lieu de résidence Limburg 30 Km nord de Frankfurt
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
stuuk
Gladiateur


Inscrit le: 21 Déc 2014
Messages: 32
MessagePosté le: Dim Jan 18, 2015 2:23 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Sorry, it's page 59.
Multiple opponents.
2nd Paragraph, line 8.

So it sounds like the rule is simply saying "if you end up in contact, but not in legal contact (such as corner to flank edge) then just conform for free"

Sound OK?

Thanks for persisting with the English Very Happy
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
  
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules questions V3
Page 1 sur 1
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet Toutes les heures sont au format GMT

 
Sauter vers:  
Vous ne pouvez pas poster de nouveaux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas éditer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas supprimer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas voter dans les sondages de ce forum