Auteur |
Message |
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1545
|
Posté le: Ven Juin 12, 2015 5:50 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Thank you very much. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
stuuk
Gladiateur
Inscrit le: 21 Déc 2014 Messages: 32
|
Posté le: Lun Juin 22, 2015 11:38 am Sujet du message: |
|
"Longbows count as “bows†for the purposes of shooting at mounted."
so longbows do not modify the protection value of mounted? |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
ethan
Signifer
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 347
|
Posté le: Lun Juin 22, 2015 1:54 pm Sujet du message: |
|
I think the point is that longbows count as both "bows" and "longbows."
So they lower the protection factor and get the +1 vs. mtd if med/hvy foot shooters. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
sebastosfig
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 04 Oct 2008 Messages: 1092
Localisation: Lisboa
|
Posté le: Lun Juin 22, 2015 3:34 pm Sujet du message: |
|
yup _________________ C'est un Germain Breton, il faut pas le secouer trop fort, meme s'il le demande.
http://backtotheminis.blogspot.com |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
stuuk
Gladiateur
Inscrit le: 21 Déc 2014 Messages: 32
|
Posté le: Lun Juin 22, 2015 5:25 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Yes they are super lethal!
gotcha.
thanks for the clarification.. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1545
|
Posté le: Jeu Juil 02, 2015 5:17 pm Sujet du message: |
|
hcaille a écrit: | Here are the answer for you :
Hazelbark a écrit: |
3) Does a unit in support destroy LI in the open? Is there a difference in corner to corner or side edge to side edge?
|
The rule is not very clear on this point. I have to check it and think about it. I will answer you next week.
|
Reminder |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
hcaille
Administrateur
Inscrit le: 20 Mai 2008 Messages: 2533
Localisation: Lyon
|
Posté le: Ven Juil 10, 2015 3:22 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Sorry for the delay
I have added the following point on the FAQ :
Q : Does a unit in support destroy LI in the open? Is there a difference in corner to corner or side edge to side edge?
A : The rule page 52 is not very clear. LI unit is destroyed in the open only if it becomes in melee with an heavy troop. This is the case if the heavy troop is contacting the LI with a part of it’s front edge (other than a single corner. A corner-to-corner contact or a flank/rear contact against LI do not destroy the LI.
Is it clear (and correct in English) ? |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Stephen
Archer
Inscrit le: 24 Mai 2015 Messages: 65
Localisation: Wheeling, West Virginia, United States
|
Posté le: Mar Juil 14, 2015 11:00 pm Sujet du message: |
|
I am confused by the example in FAQ of two bowmen and an elephant charging two HI. I was under the impression that bowmen are prohibited from charging HI (p. 51)? |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
hcaille
Administrateur
Inscrit le: 20 Mai 2008 Messages: 2533
Localisation: Lyon
|
Posté le: Jeu Juil 16, 2015 4:32 am Sujet du message: |
|
Bowmen can't charge HI unless HI is in support. In this case, HI cannot be shoot at so Bowmen are authorized to charge them (even if it's a bit dangerous). See Page 51 third bullet. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
hcaille
Administrateur
Inscrit le: 20 Mai 2008 Messages: 2533
Localisation: Lyon
|
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1545
|
Posté le: Mer Sep 02, 2015 7:14 pm Sujet du message: |
|
The restrictions on contact (p 51) are these just for front edge contact, or do they apply to ALL contacts as a result of a move to support?
A
B
_C
(A and B are fighting. Can C move up to side to side with A, lending support to B)
AC
B
This would seemingly violate page 51 |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1545
|
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
JohnTheBoring
Auxiliaire
Inscrit le: 15 Juil 2015 Messages: 83
Localisation: Wirral
|
Posté le: Sam Sep 19, 2015 3:16 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Hazelbark a écrit: |
4) Page 42 diagram edit. English version. Change Unit F sentence to clarify it does not move.
|
"You are right : the unit F doesn't move."
I am confused. Cannot F do a quarter turn and move to support H against X3? |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1545
|
Posté le: Lun Sep 21, 2015 2:29 am Sujet du message: |
|
JohnTheBoring a écrit: |
I am confused. Cannot F do a quarter turn and move to support H against X3? |
That depends on knowing the distance. Remember impetuous CV spend 2 UD to turn, so then would need to be within 2 UD after the turn. The operative part of the rules is they only move uncontrolled if they can contact. So real world measurements are the answer. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
JohnTheBoring
Auxiliaire
Inscrit le: 15 Juil 2015 Messages: 83
Localisation: Wirral
|
Posté le: Lun Sep 21, 2015 8:34 am Sujet du message: |
|
Hazelbark a écrit: | JohnTheBoring a écrit: |
I am confused. Cannot F do a quarter turn and move to support H against X3? |
That depends on knowing the distance. Remember impetuous CV spend 2 UD to turn, so then would need to be within 2 UD after the turn. The operative part of the rules is they only move uncontrolled if they can contact. So real world measurements are the answer. |
OK. The diagram is not clear and may be wrong as F is potentially within 2 UD of X3. Looks like a close measure involving a wheel after the turn as allowed for a charge. Measuring the diagram I think F could just be capable of hitting X3.
It would have been useful to highlight the 2UD to turns issue in the example. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
|