Auteur |
Message |
Nostrebor
Archer
Inscrit le: 20 Déc 2014 Messages: 62
|
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Nostrebor
Archer
Inscrit le: 20 Déc 2014 Messages: 62
|
Posté le: Sam Juin 04, 2016 6:09 pm Sujet du message: |
|
How do you / Can you embed photos in the post. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1669
|
Posté le: Sam Juin 04, 2016 7:09 pm Sujet du message: |
|
yes |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
belinconnux
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 09 Sep 2009 Messages: 5447
Localisation: BORDEAUX, near Vana
|
Posté le: Dim Juin 05, 2016 11:10 am Sujet du message: |
|
You can't have a side support in this case. Cause you can't realise a pivot by rear. _________________ Hasta la victoria Siempre!
Peter Lord dobeul impact |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
chris6
Vétéran
Inscrit le: 02 Déc 2013 Messages: 198
|
Posté le: Dim Juin 05, 2016 2:54 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Hmm...i think you pivot the wrong way.
I would pivot so that the frontside of the supporting spear is aligned to the side of the elephant but only giving support not the whole sidecharge effect because its not a legal side charge.
as belinconnux says you can not pivot backwards. _________________ Wohnort Limburg 30 Km nördlich von Frankfurt
Living at Limburg 30 Km north of Frankfurt
lieu de résidence Limburg 30 Km nord de Frankfurt |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
alberto
Légionaire
Inscrit le: 15 Nov 2015 Messages: 111
Localisation: trieste
|
Posté le: Dim Juin 05, 2016 4:30 pm Sujet du message: |
|
I see the question in another wiew
I'll advance the Spearmen 1,5 UD, then wheel to align the front with the other two units and shift to conform flank to flank with other friendly unit giving support |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
chris6
Vétéran
Inscrit le: 02 Déc 2013 Messages: 198
|
Posté le: Dim Juin 05, 2016 5:03 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Good Idea. Looks good. _________________ Wohnort Limburg 30 Km nördlich von Frankfurt
Living at Limburg 30 Km north of Frankfurt
lieu de résidence Limburg 30 Km nord de Frankfurt |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1669
|
Posté le: Dim Juin 05, 2016 5:23 pm Sujet du message: |
|
belinconnux a écrit: | You can't have a side support in this case. Cause you can't realise a pivot by rear. |
Where does this say this in conforming. If true it makes a large number of attack illegal.
Consider page 51 Right side C1 and b1 are both likely to have their front corner needing to pivot and slide backward to conform to front.
I agree you cannot pivot back in a move. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1669
|
Posté le: Dim Juin 05, 2016 5:26 pm Sujet du message: |
|
chris6 a écrit: |
I would pivot so that the frontside of the supporting spear is aligned to the side of the elephant but only giving support not the whole sidecharge effect because its not a legal side charge.
|
The question was about moving into support. Not flank charge. Agreed no flank charge allowed. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Nostrebor
Archer
Inscrit le: 20 Déc 2014 Messages: 62
|
Posté le: Dim Juin 05, 2016 8:29 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Hazelbark a écrit: | chris6 a écrit: |
I would pivot so that the frontside of the supporting spear is aligned to the side of the elephant but only giving support not the whole sidecharge effect because its not a legal side charge.
|
The question was about moving into support. Not flank charge. Agreed no flank charge allowed. |
I was specifically asking about a case where a flank charge was not legal, but it was not obvious how you would slide and/or wheel to get into side to side contact. What I illustrated is how we usually play it, but I cannot really justify it per the rules. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1669
|
Posté le: Lun Juin 06, 2016 7:01 pm Sujet du message: |
|
I think your explanation fits the rules for conforming.
If you say this contact is not allowed by the "types of contact" p 51
I would say that is allowed per p 52 "can always contact to provide for support"
If you make p51 the only way, then it massively restricts the ability of units to get into support. As it would forbid moving past someone's front edge in support because you could not slide straight forward to touch a side. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Ramses II
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015 Messages: 1236
Localisation: London
|
Posté le: Ven Juin 10, 2016 6:55 pm Sujet du message: |
|
I have been re-reading the comments here, and hope the following is correct:-- Conforming is stated as being "used to align opposing units corner to corner in order to simplify the resolution of melee". Consequently I believe you can only conform as part of a charge or movement within a melee, not as part of moving into support.
- Nostrebor, I think Bellinconnux is correct that you may not pivot as shown in your diagram, because the unit has to perform 'legal' movements during both standard movement and also when conforming (after a charge).
However I believe the unit could pivot clockwise forwards (with a small slide right) which would leave the unit in flank-flank contact with the front edge beyond the rear of the elephant. Equally the unit could stop short of the elephants, pivot clockwise and then slide left into contact.
Either would still constitute "support" per the third bullet of Support.
- Chris suggests conforming by pivoting anti-clockwise and sliding left to bring the unit's front edge into contact with the elephant's flank.
I think this is an 'illegal contact' because it is not permitted to make a flank charge from a position in advance of the enemy's front edge.
Consequently the comments about ignoring the flank charge effects are superfluous
- Alberto's manoeuvre to align the support with the other unit of spears is correct and forms a group for future turns.
- Finally, if had the unit started further forward in a position to make a legal charge into flank contact, it raises the point that the player can choose whether to move into support or flank charge and conform (provided the conforming movement does not exceed 1UD
)
|
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1669
|
Posté le: Ven Juin 10, 2016 7:57 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Ramses II
add this one to your thinking
p 52 contact restrictions
"A unit can always contact an enemy to provide support if the enemy is already engaged in melee..." |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Ramses II
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015 Messages: 1236
Localisation: London
|
Posté le: Ven Juin 10, 2016 8:02 pm Sujet du message: |
|
I am not sure what you are suggesting here. Please could you elaborate further.
All I said was that a unit cannot 'conform' as part of a move that puts it in support. I believe Conforming is reserved for charging and melees that let the unit "engage" the enemy. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1669
|
Posté le: Ven Juin 10, 2016 8:11 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Ramses II a écrit: | I am not sure what you are suggesting here. Please could you elaborate further. All I said was that a unit cannot 'conform' as part of a move that puts it into support. I believe Conforming is reserved for charging and melees. |
I am saying the original posting is in fact legal to move to support with that process.
There as near as I can say is nothing about conforming being reserved only for charges. Under p52 conforming uses term contact.
I see what you are driving out. My concern is that increases the geometric issues of the game. (IE. slides and wheels to get into a support position).
So I will consult a more learned person. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
|