|
Art De La Guerre
Bienvenue sur le forum de discussion de la règle de jeu l'Art De La Guerre
|
Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Miniatures and painting
Auteur |
Message |
76mm
Barbare
Inscrit le: 18 Déc 2023 Messages: 25
Localisation: Washington, DC
|
Posté le: Dim Fév 18, 2024 2:11 pm Sujet du message: Basing LMI? |
|
I don't see anything in the rules specifically about basing LMI, so I guess they should be on the same size base as MI? But what about number of figures? Given the "loose" part, it seems like there should be fewer figures than normal MI. Are there any conventions that people use?
I'll be using 10mm, so am thinking about basing 16 figures for MI and 14 for LMI; for LMI basically use 3 figures instead of four every other row. Or am I overthinking this? |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Mark G Fry
Légat

Inscrit le: 15 Juin 2017 Messages: 571
Localisation: Bristol, UK
|
Posté le: Dim Fév 18, 2024 3:40 pm Sujet du message: |
|
LMI are usually based on the same size bases as MF - so that would be 40mm x 40mm for 10mm scale figures - and 10-16 figures (as per the table on page 7).
Ultimately, however, it's up to you how many figures you want on your bases of course. And it not necessarily safe to assume that LMI are more irregular in their fighting formation - take Middle Imperial Roman Lanciarii for example - which can be Javelinmen elite and would have been highly drilled troops. So having them in more regular ranks, for example, might be the right way to depict them. Parthian or Sassanian Hill Tribesmen however, also Javelinmen, might be better depicted in a more 'ragged' formation.
But it's important to stress that there is no firm rules or even conventions here. For example, I depict my Lanciarii in a wedge formation, as it looks impressive and helps me differentiate them from the other 40mm x 40mm based troops in the army (my MF swd impact Auxillia). My Auxillia MF are based in ranks, as are my Auxillia bowmen, but my German Symmacharii - MF swd impetuous (in my Early Imperial Roman army) are based in a more random formation - to reflect (in my eyes) their more irregular fighting style.
I've also seen some people put fewer figures on a base to represent 'Mediocre' units - others put fewer figures on to represent 'Elite' units (& vice versa) - that's a personal choice. Neither are right or wrong - it's just what helps you play the game
Hope that is helpful.
Cheers
Mark |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
76mm
Barbare
Inscrit le: 18 Déc 2023 Messages: 25
Localisation: Washington, DC
|
Posté le: Dim Fév 18, 2024 4:51 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Thanks Mark! Helpful, but I'm still a bit mystified LMI...
First, while I understand that LMI can be in regular formations, in principle shouldn't they be in "looser" regular formations than Medium Infantry (hence the name LMI?). Otherwise, how are they intended to be different from plain-old Medium Infantry?
Second, I'm still trying to understand what opponents expect to see on the table...do players get annoyed when they can't easily tell LMI from MI based on basing, etc, or should I expect them to look at the (tiny 10mm) figures and the army list to figure out who is who (of course I will also explain orally, but...)? |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
KevinD
Légat
Inscrit le: 23 Aoû 2021 Messages: 646
Localisation: Texas
|
Posté le: Dim Fév 18, 2024 5:52 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Which troops are you talking about?
Archers and crossbowmen are generally based the same as any MI as their weapon and lack of shields makes them easy to tell apart.
Javelinmen are harder to distinguish from MI at a quick glance so many people base them with fewer figs per base than MI to easily distinguish them. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
76mm
Barbare
Inscrit le: 18 Déc 2023 Messages: 25
Localisation: Washington, DC
|
Posté le: Dim Fév 18, 2024 9:21 pm Sujet du message: |
|
KevinD a écrit: | Which troops are you talking about?
|
I was speaking generally, but I see your point, I guess bows and crossbows are pretty hard to miss, even @10mm.
But it sounds like there aren't really any particular rules or conventions, so I guess I will just put some guys on a base and see how they look! |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
kevinj
Signifer
Inscrit le: 07 Fév 2017 Messages: 368
Localisation: Chesterfield, Derbyshire, UK
|
Posté le: Lun Fév 19, 2024 9:29 am Sujet du message: |
|
Citation: | First, while I understand that LMI can be in regular formations, in principle shouldn't they be in "looser" regular formations than Medium Infantry (hence the name LMI?). Otherwise, how are they intended to be different from plain-old Medium Infantry? |
The main difference between LMI and Medium Foot in ADLG is that the LMI are principally shooters in denser formations than Light Infantry so shoot more effectively than them but are not proficient in melee. Medium Infantry are more combat oriented. Units proficient at both (e.g. some Mixed Sword/Spearmen with bows/crossbows, later Longbowmen or Samurai) are classed af Medium Infantry rather than LMI.
Some players have adopted a convention of basing LMI 5 to a base instead of 6 to differentiate them. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
ethan
Signifer
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 354
|
Posté le: Lun Fév 19, 2024 4:08 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Really the key here is
A) Do something that looks nice
B) Do something that makes it clear what your troops actually are
In general for LMI/MI I do a variety of things 6-8 figures per base (even occasionally 5)
- My 28mm javelinmen for Hellenistics are 5 to a base
- My Assyrian supported MSw are 4 swordsmen and 2 archers
- My Aechemenid Persian Immortals are 8 to a base, the sparabara types are 6 (so I can differentiate elite from ordinary)
- Most Bowmen/Crossbowmen are 6 to a base now. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
76mm
Barbare
Inscrit le: 18 Déc 2023 Messages: 25
Localisation: Washington, DC
|
Posté le: Lun Fév 19, 2024 6:13 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Thanks to everyone for your responses; very helpful and hopefully sooner or later I'll figure this stuff out! |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Dolphinless
Frondeur
Inscrit le: 15 Aoû 2024 Messages: 8
|
Posté le: Dim Sep 08, 2024 6:16 am Sujet du message: |
|
76mm a écrit: | I don't see anything in the rules specifically about basing LMI, so I guess they should be on the same size base as MI? But what about number of figures? Given the "loose" part, it seems like there should be fewer figures than normal MI. Are there any conventions that people use?
I'll be using 10mm, so am thinking about basing 16 figures for MI and 14 for LMI; for LMI basically use 3 figures instead of four every other row. Or am I overthinking this? |
I agree with the lack of specifics. I'm an old WRG Ancients player & fairly experienced in DBA andall of my figures are based for DBA, (all infantry 20mm deep, all cavalry 30mm deep). ADLG rules say that base depth 'does not matter much'.
The main text in the rules states MI & LMI are both loose formation, so why have different numbers of models on the base?
Why not have always have 3 per base (for 15mm) to indicate loose formation?
So HI would be close formation with 4 per base, MI & LMI loose formation with 3 per base & LI open formation 2 per base.
Which, funnily enough, in most cases, this method of 2, 3 or 4 per base matches the troop type's cohesion.....
Very simple _________________ Always looking for a better way of doing stuff |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Mark G Fry
Légat

Inscrit le: 15 Juin 2017 Messages: 571
Localisation: Bristol, UK
|
Posté le: Dim Sep 08, 2024 7:48 am Sujet du message: |
|
Dolphinless a écrit: | 76mm a écrit: | I don't see anything in the rules specifically about basing LMI, so I guess they should be on the same size base as MI? But what about number of figures? Given the "loose" part, it seems like there should be fewer figures than normal MI. Are there any conventions that people use?
I'll be using 10mm, so am thinking about basing 16 figures for MI and 14 for LMI; for LMI basically use 3 figures instead of four every other row. Or am I overthinking this? |
I agree with the lack of specifics. I'm an old WRG Ancients player & fairly experienced in DBA andall of my figures are based for DBA, (all infantry 20mm deep, all cavalry 30mm deep). ADLG rules say that base depth 'does not matter much'.
The main text in the rules states MI & LMI are both loose formation, so why have different numbers of models on the base?
Why not have always have 3 per base (for 15mm) to indicate loose formation?
So HI would be close formation with 4 per base, MI & LMI loose formation with 3 per base & LI open formation 2 per base.
Which, funnily enough, in most cases, this method of 2, 3 or 4 per base matches the troop type's cohesion.....
Very simple |
I think the idea behind different numbers of figures on a base is to aid identification - if not necessarily for you, but for your opponent.
HF are easy to differentiate as they are usually 8 figures to a base (4 in two ranks) - likewise most Cavalry are easy to differentiate (3 to a base) and Light Infantry & Light Cavalry 2 to a base. But Cataphracts (@ 4 to a base) can often present challenge as fitting some of the larger '15mm' figures across a 40mm frontage can be hard - likewise most players now base their Pikemen, 12 to a 40mm square base, 3 ranks of 4 deep, just to fit them on the base.
The original question was about LMI - which are based on the same base size as MF (40mm x 40mm) - and so can be less easy to differentiate. Both usually have 6 figures per base (or in old WRG terminology 3 figures x 2 ranks/bases) but as MF swordsmen in ADLG can be armed with short spear, it can often be hard to differentiate them from Javelinmen (for example). The larger bases in ADLG allow flexibility to show a more Irregular formation or a wedge or ranks - and this might be used to help differentiate the different troop types (or at least hold that differentiation in the mind of an opponent during a game).
But a hard & fast rule is not necessary - as long as the base frontages are the same.
I've played HoTT for example using the 60mm frontage bases with 6mm troops mounted on them. It looks spectacular and plays in exactly the same way as a 40mm frontage game. You could equally apply the same principle to ADLG - 10mm figures based to the 60mm frontage bases for 28mm and playing to the same move distances and ranges. I expect it would create a great game.
Cheers
Mark _________________ 'He could have lived a risk-free, moneyed life, but he preferred to whittle away his fortune on warfare.' Xenophon, The Anabasis |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Ramses II
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015 Messages: 1235
Localisation: London
|
Posté le: Mer Sep 11, 2024 5:25 pm Sujet du message: |
|
As others say, this is as much about identification as anything else. The table on p7 covers basing, and the definitions on p13 define LMI as Loose Medium Infantry - or a different type of MI.Â
Levy use the same base as HI, but have different numbers of figures. MI may have 6 or 8figures on a 40mm sq base (to distinguish it from HI), personally I put 5-6 figures on a base in an irregular formation to identify a LMI unit. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
|
Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Miniatures and painting
 |
Toutes les heures sont au format GMT |
|
Vous ne pouvez pas poster de nouveaux sujets dans ce forum Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum Vous ne pouvez pas éditer vos messages dans ce forum Vous ne pouvez pas supprimer vos messages dans ce forum Vous ne pouvez pas voter dans les sondages de ce forum
|
|