Auteur |
Message |
Andy Fyfe
Auxiliaire
Inscrit le: 14 Fév 2024 Messages: 80
|
Posté le: Mer Aoû 07, 2024 10:00 am Sujet du message: Melee contact |
|
Hi Guys,
Hopefully a simple question about melee contact following a charge.
A Med SW charged a bowman and contacted the front at an angle meaning that only one front corner of the charging unit contacted the front (not corner) of the target unit.
Due to penalising terrain the Med SW did not want to conform to front to front contact.
Is this a valid contact for melee?
I know that corner to corner is not a valid contact but is corner to front a valid contact?
The consensus what that it was valid.
Andy |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1669
|
Posté le: Mer Aoû 07, 2024 3:37 pm Sujet du message: |
|
It is valid.
But to be clear, the terrain would have had to been difficult because rough does not penalize the MI.
And you cannot just choose not to conform, if full conformation is available without the listed exceptions.
It sounds like you are describing the diagram p53, right column middle, Unit B. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Andy Fyfe
Auxiliaire
Inscrit le: 14 Fév 2024 Messages: 80
|
Posté le: Mer Aoû 07, 2024 6:56 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Hazelbark a écrit: | It is valid.
But to be clear, the terrain would have had to been difficult because rough does not penalize the MI.
And you cannot just choose not to conform, if full conformation is available without the listed exceptions.
It sounds like you are describing the diagram p53, right column middle, Unit B. |
Hi Dan,
It was difficult (a marsh).
Yes; similar. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Mike Bennett
Légat
Inscrit le: 11 Nov 2017 Messages: 583
Localisation: Carnforth, Lancashire, UK
|
Posté le: Mer Aoû 07, 2024 8:17 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Is this response saying that you can remain in partial conformation without any actual edge contact? Ie front corner only contacting the edge, and still in melee?
Page 54 diagram “ambiguous conformation†is not exactly the same, but it does forbid corner to front edge contact. It does not allow the unit to remain there in contact by only a corner to avoid the penalising terrain, but requires it to align and accept entering the terrain. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Zoltan
Légat
Inscrit le: 18 Jan 2015 Messages: 500
Localisation: Wellington, New Zealand
|
Posté le: Jeu Aoû 08, 2024 6:29 am Sujet du message: |
|
I find it helpful to think of it as a two step process:
1. Can the charger make a legal contact (any kind of contact)?
2. If yes, what is the correct conformation (which may be a temporary incomplete conformation). |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Andy Fyfe
Auxiliaire
Inscrit le: 14 Fév 2024 Messages: 80
|
Posté le: Jeu Aoû 08, 2024 8:49 am Sujet du message: |
|
Mike Bennett a écrit: | Is this response saying that you can remain in partial conformation without any actual edge contact? Ie front corner only contacting the edge, and still in melee?
Page 54 diagram “ambiguous conformation†is not exactly the same, but it does forbid corner to front edge contact. It does not allow the unit to remain there in contact by only a corner to avoid the penalising terrain, but requires it to align and accept entering the terrain. |
Hi Mike,
That diagram is about being more aligned with a different unit following conformation; not about entering penalising terrain.
It at no points states that a single corner contact to front edge is not allowed.
On the target's turn they will conform to the charger.
Andy |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Andy Fyfe
Auxiliaire
Inscrit le: 14 Fév 2024 Messages: 80
|
Posté le: Jeu Aoû 08, 2024 8:50 am Sujet du message: |
|
Zoltan a écrit: | I find it helpful to think of it as a two step process:
1. Can the charger make a legal contact (any kind of contact)?
2. If yes, what is the correct conformation (which may be a temporary incomplete conformation). |
I think the confusion comes from:
1. Is this a legal contact?
2. No conformation following the charge takes place - is that allowed?
The consensus seems to be 'yes' for both. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Mike Bennett
Légat
Inscrit le: 11 Nov 2017 Messages: 583
Localisation: Carnforth, Lancashire, UK
|
Posté le: Jeu Aoû 08, 2024 9:48 am Sujet du message: |
|
Andy Fyfe a écrit: |
It at no points states that a single corner contact to front edge is not allowed..
Andy |
“….B is.forced to enter the penalising terrain in order to fully conform against A1â€
Surely this makes no sense if single corner is allowed, as then B would stay exactly as shown in the picture at the immediate moment of contact fighting A1 without entering the terrain. It only ends up needing to put more of the base in “ambiguous contact†with A2 if it must line up in edge to edge contact with A1
Dernière édition par Mike Bennett le Jeu Aoû 08, 2024 10:11 am; édité 2 fois |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Mike Bennett
Légat
Inscrit le: 11 Nov 2017 Messages: 583
Localisation: Carnforth, Lancashire, UK
|
Posté le: Jeu Aoû 08, 2024 9:58 am Sujet du message: |
|
NB: the paragraph starts “after conformation a unit must be clearly aligned….†Units at different angles to each other are not aligned.
1. Verb: place or arrange (things) in a straight line. “the desks are aligned in straight rows facing forwards"
Ps I appreciate that the intention might not be to use “aligned†as it is actually defined, but thems the words wots written. Without the authors / rules committee view we cannot know what was intended, only what is written. In any case needing sone edge contact, not just a single corner, seems perfectly reasonable to me.
Dernière édition par Mike Bennett le Jeu Aoû 08, 2024 10:23 pm; édité 1 fois |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Zoltan
Légat
Inscrit le: 18 Jan 2015 Messages: 500
Localisation: Wellington, New Zealand
|
Posté le: Jeu Aoû 08, 2024 12:47 pm Sujet du message: |
|
I’m struggling to envisage the shape of the difficult terrain piece that prevents the charger conforming to the target (aligning/becoming parallel with) at least partially, following the initial front corner contact. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Mike Bennett
Légat
Inscrit le: 11 Nov 2017 Messages: 583
Localisation: Carnforth, Lancashire, UK
|
Posté le: Jeu Aoû 08, 2024 1:40 pm Sujet du message: |
|
I have seen it where the target is in a gap between two terrain pieces |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Andy Fyfe
Auxiliaire
Inscrit le: 14 Fév 2024 Messages: 80
|
Posté le: Jeu Aoû 08, 2024 3:38 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Zoltan a écrit: | I’m struggling to envisage the shape of the difficult terrain piece that prevents the charger conforming to the target (aligning/becoming parallel with) at least partially, following the initial front corner contact. |
The charging unit had the terrain to one side and another friendly unit hard up against the other side,
The target was at an angle to the charger and was partially within the terrain.
The charging unit could not align due to the friendly unit on one side and the terrain on the other. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Mark G Fry
Légat

Inscrit le: 15 Juin 2017 Messages: 573
Localisation: Bristol, UK
|
Posté le: Jeu Aoû 08, 2024 4:01 pm Sujet du message: |
|
This then raises a separate but associated question.
If the attacking unit of MF swd is not forced to align to the front edge of the Bowman, to avoid the penalizing terrain, what happens in the next bound?
If the Bowmen survives the initial melee, is it now forced to align to the front edge of the MF swd, thus putting its back edge into the penalizing terrain and fighting at a forced disadvantage. Which seems a bit odd.
Or are both units left to fight as they initially made contact, until the melee is resolved? _________________ 'He could have lived a risk-free, moneyed life, but he preferred to whittle away his fortune on warfare.' Xenophon, The Anabasis |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
navigator
Auxiliaire
Inscrit le: 09 Sep 2018 Messages: 82
Localisation: robin hoods bay UK
|
Posté le: Ven Aoû 09, 2024 10:11 am Sujet du message: |
|
P42 for a charge units must contact enemy ..even with a single corner...so the example has a legal contact.
Terrain means no conformation till next bound by the charge receiver .simples...
No need to over complicate things. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Neep
Prétorien
Inscrit le: 09 Jan 2023 Messages: 298
|
Posté le: Ven Aoû 09, 2024 2:05 pm Sujet du message: |
|
I was looking at this the other day. I was surprised to realize that all friendlies can be shifted so long as they are not in melee. Now I've looked at the errata and realize why I was surprised - not all friendlies can be shifted.
It is possible, by using impassible terrain, ongoing melees, and unshiftable friendlies, to construct situations where you can only make corner to edge contact, or even corner to corner contact.
I assume only corner to corner contact means the move is not allowed, based on the implications of page 51 Conforming units already in contact.
Corner to edge is moot. I'm with Mike that you must conform into penalizing terrain if it's possible, but if it it's impossible? |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
|