Auteur |
Message |
Ackostokie
Javelinier
Inscrit le: 22 Jan 2015 Messages: 15
|
Posté le: Ven Avr 03, 2015 8:56 pm Sujet du message: Declaring Flank March |
|
A couple of doubts on flank march
1) When do you tell your opponent that you are attempting a flank march. My thought would be after you have deployed your other two corps on the table.
2) When do you tell your opponent which flank your corp is coming on to. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
lionelrus
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2009 Messages: 4802
Localisation: paris
|
Posté le: Ven Avr 03, 2015 10:36 pm Sujet du message: |
|
1) you only have to said he can't see the corps.
2) when you roll 5 our 6 (except in first riound) _________________ "Quand on a pas de technique, faut y aller à la zob"
Perceval à Yvain et Gauvain. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Ackostokie
Javelinier
Inscrit le: 22 Jan 2015 Messages: 15
|
Posté le: Ven Avr 03, 2015 11:49 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Thanks for your reply.
I think the actual disclosing to your opponent that you are attempting a flank march is important. I know he cant see the corps, but if you tell him before he deploys his troops. He may use the information to deploy his troops in expectation to counter the flank march. Especially if one side is a coast or river so he knows for certain which side the flank march is arriving on. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Longtooth
Signifer
Inscrit le: 14 Oct 2014 Messages: 357
Localisation: Oxford
|
Posté le: Sam Avr 04, 2015 8:09 am Sujet du message: |
|
You don't need to tell your opponent that you have units in flank march.
Your opponent will clearly see that only two of your corps have been deployed on the table and he will need to guess whether the missing units are: (a) attempting a flank march; or (b) deployed in ambush. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Longtooth
Signifer
Inscrit le: 14 Oct 2014 Messages: 357
Localisation: Oxford
|
Posté le: Sam Avr 04, 2015 8:59 am Sujet du message: |
|
...further to my response above, you do have to reveal your flank march when you roll a 5 or 6 (or 6 on first turn). |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
I never roll a six
Gladiateur
Inscrit le: 07 Oct 2014 Messages: 41
|
Posté le: Lun Avr 06, 2015 9:57 am Sujet du message: Disclosing a flank march |
|
My understanding of the rules, based on the last paragraph of the first column on page 73 of the rules, is that if both players have chosen to flank march on the same flank, on the second player's first turn, the players compare the size of their respective flanking forces; the smaller force is driven back, arriving on Turn 2, and the larger flanking force arrives in its next turn immediately afterwards. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
sebastosfig
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 04 Oct 2008 Messages: 1092
Localisation: Lisboa
|
Posté le: Lun Avr 06, 2015 10:01 am Sujet du message: Re: Disclosing a flank march |
|
I never roll a six a écrit: | My understanding of the rules, based on the last paragraph of the first column on page 73 of the rules, is that if both players have chosen to flank march on the same flank, on the second player's first turn, the players compare the size of their respective flanking forces; the smaller force is driven back, arriving on Turn 2, and the larger flanking force arrives in its next turn immediately afterwards. |
You are right. However, the smaller corps will arrive on his own side of the table, whereas the bigger one will arrive anywhere on the table edge.  _________________ C'est un Germain Breton, il faut pas le secouer trop fort, meme s'il le demande.
http://backtotheminis.blogspot.com |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Ackostokie
Javelinier
Inscrit le: 22 Jan 2015 Messages: 15
|
Posté le: Mar Avr 07, 2015 11:02 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Hi all, thanks for the replies, Ive also found a paragraph at the bottom of page 70 in the Ambush section
" If an entire army corps is placed in ambush, the player can roll the die each game-turn to determine CP (even if not used). This can confuse the opponent who does not then know if the corps is in ambush or on flank march."
So like you have said, I don't have to tell my opponent until, I get a 5 or 6 on the dice
Phil  |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Commodore
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 23 Aoû 2012 Messages: 1238
Localisation: London
|
Posté le: Mer Avr 08, 2015 6:05 am Sujet du message: |
|
Ackostokie a écrit: |
So like you have said, I don't have to tell my opponent until, I get a 5 or 6 on the dice
Phil  |
That is correct, it is a sort of "on table flank march" _________________ "Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead"
Cdr Farragut,Mobile 1864 |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
sebastosfig
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 04 Oct 2008 Messages: 1092
Localisation: Lisboa
|
Posté le: Mer Avr 08, 2015 7:27 am Sujet du message: |
|
Indeed, and pretty useful too  _________________ C'est un Germain Breton, il faut pas le secouer trop fort, meme s'il le demande.
http://backtotheminis.blogspot.com |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Ramses II
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015 Messages: 1235
Localisation: London
|
Posté le: Mar Sep 22, 2015 7:42 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Further to this, I agree that the "on table flank march" is usefull. However, could someone explain the processes here;
1) When does the player "dice" for the false flank march, at the start of each bound, or after one or both of the other on-table commands?
2) What is the process where both players decide to use "off-table" forces? Exactly when does each player take what particular action?
I assume that players deploy their on-table forces, revealing that two commands are off-table. Presumably each player "dices" each turn until one of them gets a 5 or 6. But what happens at this point? |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1669
|
Posté le: Mar Sep 22, 2015 8:40 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Ramses II a écrit: |
1) When does the player "dice" for the false flank march, at the start of each bound, or after one or both of the other on-table commands? |
p 72 at the beginning of the movement phase.
Citation: | 2) What is the process where both players decide to use "off-table" forces? Exactly when does each player take what particular action? |
Sides A rolls at the beginning of its movement phases. Side B rolls at the beginning of its movement phases.
Citation: |
I assume that players deploy their on-table forces, revealing that two commands are off-table. |
p 72 each player may only have one command on flank march. I think you meant two -- one from each player. Yes you deploy normally. Opponent deploys normally.
Citation: | Presumably each player "dices" each turn until one of them gets a 5 or 6. But what happens at this point? |
p 72-73
On page 73 tells you what happens under "driving back a flank march". i.e. both sides arriving on the same side. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Ramses II
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015 Messages: 1235
Localisation: London
|
Posté le: Mar Sep 22, 2015 9:08 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Thanks for the fast reply.
Yes, I was asking for the detailed process when both sides had one command "off-table". The point being that either or both could be disguising on-table ambushes. This being the case, I presume that each player dices at the start of their own movement phase until someone throws a 5 or 6. But what is the precise set of actions at this point?
Player A throws 5/6, so must reveal whether his off-table command is a flank march, and if so, which flank. Am I right that player B either confirms his flank march on the same flank (where one or other is 'pushed back') or remains silent because his troops are either on the other flank or in ambush? |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
A4
Auxiliaire
Inscrit le: 08 Oct 2014 Messages: 78
|
Posté le: Mar Sep 22, 2015 11:48 pm Sujet du message: Re: Disclosing a flank march |
|
I never roll a six a écrit: | My understanding of the rules, based on the last paragraph of the first column on page 73 of the rules, is that if both players have chosen to flank march on the same flank, on the second player's first turn, the players compare the size of their respective flanking forces; the smaller force is driven back, arriving on Turn 2, and the larger flanking force arrives in its next turn immediately afterwards. |
This seems to be how the bottom of the left hand column of page 73 is normally played. However, that is not how I would read what is written there, in the English version. That says that "If both players have ordered a flank march on the same edge of the table, the corps with the fewest units is driven back." It does not say when or how you discover that both players have ordered a flank march on the same edge. Is that explained more fully elsewhere in the rules, or more clearly in the French edition?
If I had to rely purely on the words on p 73 I would say that if both sides have an invisible command each dices as normal. Only when one has rolled a 5 or 6 and declared his is marching around, say, the north edge would the other be asked if he is marching around the same flank and, if so, the smallest command would be driven on.
Though, I admit that is not the way it is normally played.
The trouble with the conventional way this is played is that, as Ramesses points out, it does not tally well with the last paragraph on p 70. That makes it clear that an opponent should not normally know whether a command he cannot see is ambushing or flank marching.
When p 73 is interpreted in the normal way what is the procedure? When both players have a command absent do they write and declare simultaneously whether it is in ambush or flank marching and, if the latter, on which flank?
Alan |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
ethan
Signifer
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 354
|
Posté le: Mer Sep 23, 2015 11:39 am Sujet du message: Re: Disclosing a flank march |
|
A4 a écrit: |
When p 73 is interpreted in the normal way what is the procedure? When both players have a command absent do they write and declare simultaneously whether it is in ambush or flank marching and, if the latter, on which flank?
Alan |
Each side has to have noted on his deployment map what they are doing (flank march, ambushes, etc.). If both have a "hidden command" and one has rolled a 5-6/6 as appropriate they declare a flank march.
The informational flow in this case is clear as the person rolling a successful arrival MUST declare which flank they are arriving on or if there is no flank march they must be entirely in ambush - there are no other options.
The opponent then indicates if he has a flank march on that flank. If not then the flank march arrives as usual and the other player carries on rolling for arrival or to continue disguising their ambush.
I am simply not sure what the issue is here? Given the information flow neither side is revealing any more than the necessary information and the only other concern would seem to be cheating where someone did not live up to their deployment map... |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
|