Auteur |
Message |
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1669
|
Posté le: Jeu Mai 14, 2015 4:50 pm Sujet du message: LI evade an Elephant |
|
Is LI required to evade an Elephant in the open?
The rules suggest yes as an Elephant is heavier than LI, but the portion in parens does not include an Elephant.
So just checking LI MUST evade Elephants in the open, correct? |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
lionelrus
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2009 Messages: 4802
Localisation: paris
|
Posté le: Jeu Mai 14, 2015 5:41 pm Sujet du message: |
|
no _________________ "Quand on a pas de technique, faut y aller à la zob"
Perceval à Yvain et Gauvain. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Soranon
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 19 Juil 2012 Messages: 2640
Localisation: Toulouse
|
Posté le: Ven Mai 15, 2015 12:44 am Sujet du message: |
|
An LI can fight an elephant in open so an LI isn't required to dodge. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1669
|
Posté le: Ven Mai 15, 2015 2:40 am Sujet du message: |
|
I see LI can charge EL. p 52
But p 38 suggests LI ought to mandatory evade.
Should add this to the FAQ |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
lionelrus
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2009 Messages: 4802
Localisation: paris
|
Posté le: Ven Mai 15, 2015 6:13 am Sujet du message: |
|
We are not FAQ' masters, only El Kreator is! _________________ "Quand on a pas de technique, faut y aller à la zob"
Perceval à Yvain et Gauvain. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
sebastosfig
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 04 Oct 2008 Messages: 1092
Localisation: Lisboa
|
Posté le: Ven Mai 15, 2015 7:58 am Sujet du message: |
|
Well, we could suggest him to add it.  _________________ C'est un Germain Breton, il faut pas le secouer trop fort, meme s'il le demande.
http://backtotheminis.blogspot.com |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Soranon
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 19 Juil 2012 Messages: 2640
Localisation: Toulouse
|
Posté le: Ven Mai 15, 2015 9:46 am Sujet du message: |
|
P 38 (french rule) :
Citation: | TROUPE DEVANT ESQUIVER
Les unités d'infanterie légère ont l'obligation d'esquiver la charge des troupes plus lourdes (Cv, Kn, LMI, MI, HI) si elles sont contactées en terrain clair. |
It is said that LI must evade against Cv, Kn, LMI, MI and HI in open. Not against elephant. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1669
|
Posté le: Ven Mai 15, 2015 3:35 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Soranon a écrit: | P 38 (french rule) :
Citation: | TROUPE DEVANT ESQUIVER
Les unités d'infanterie légère ont l'obligation d'esquiver la charge des troupes plus lourdes (Cv, Kn, LMI, MI, HI) si elles sont contactées en terrain clair. |
It is said that LI must evade against Cv, Kn, LMI, MI and HI in open. Not against elephant. |
The good news is the English translation is almost identical, except inside the ( ) it begins with i.e.
So you read this as only the heavier troops listed.
Let us ask the Kreator to add this to FAQ. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Muntaner
Javelinier
Inscrit le: 30 Jan 2015 Messages: 19
|
Posté le: Sam Mai 16, 2015 2:53 am Sujet du message: |
|
Citation: | The rules suggest yes as an Elephant is heavier than LI, but the portion in parens does not include an Elephant. |
In my opinion, it does not. The English translation uses i.e., which means that the listed unit types in parenthesis composes the entire list of heavier troops. If that list was a partial one, providing only a few examples, it would have used e.g. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1669
|
Posté le: Lun Mai 18, 2015 3:01 am Sujet du message: |
|
ah yes forgot the old ie versus eg. Just assumed, then...
that supports the view articulated here. it is not required to evade. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
|