hcaille
Administrateur
Inscrit le: 20 Mai 2008
Messages: 2547
Localisation: Lyon
|
 Posté le: Lun Juil 20, 2015 4:37 am Sujet du message: Commander lost in melee |
 |
There is one question about commanders :
| Citation: |
P 25 "if the unit to which he is attached is routed, the commander is lost on a result of 1,2, or 3."
This suggests the commander can be lost even if NOT engaged in melee.
The wording is different on p 61 where it says "engaged in melee and attached to a unit that routs".
I believe your p 61 is your real intent.
The page 25 section is under the "commander in melee" heading. On page 24 you write "A commander attached to a unit in melee but not engaged is not at risk of being lost. "
Can you confirm the page 61 and page 24 are your clear intent and the single sentence on page 25 must be read with those in mind?
|
There is a misprint P25. The correct sentence should be "if the unit to which he is engaged in melee is routed, the commander is lost on a result of 1,2, or 3.
I confirm that a commander must be engaged in melee to risk being lost. If he is included in a unit he must be engaged. |
|
FAQ
Rechercher
Liste des Membres
Groupes d'utilisateurs
S'enregistrer
Profil
Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés
Connexion
