Pyrrhus17
Gladiateur
Inscrit le: 14 Sep 2016 Messages: 36
|
Posté le: Ven Oct 14, 2016 1:56 pm Sujet du message: List 44 Pyrrhic question |
|
Pyrrhic Italian list does the mediocre pike men requirement include the Hypaspists ? I thought I read some where it doesn't which is it. Love Pyrrhus but this list is dam restrictive its hard to build a solid list with good HP and good size . wish it had a little more spice |
|
Dickstick
Tribun
Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016 Messages: 721
Localisation: West Bromwich
|
Posté le: Mer Déc 14, 2016 8:18 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Will not include elites because the troop title does not match restrictions title. _________________ Player 747 don't call me Jumbo |
|
Pyrrhus17
Gladiateur
Inscrit le: 14 Sep 2016 Messages: 36
|
Posté le: Jeu Déc 15, 2016 7:24 pm Sujet du message: |
|
thanks , Although I cant seem to make a list that would be any good out of the Italian option . I wish the lists were a little spicier or the points wre at 250!
best I can think of
I corps brilliant gen
2 HC impact Elite
1 Elephant
1 li bw 1 li sL
3 pikemen
2 med sw
II corps brilliant general
1 Elephant
2 med sw impact Elite
2 LI jav
3 pikemen mediocre
corps III ordinary
2 HC
2 lc jav
Any way I am not sure it would work |
|
daveallen
Tribun

Inscrit le: 28 Jan 2016 Messages: 758
Localisation: Rugby & CLWC
|
Posté le: Mar Jan 03, 2017 3:16 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Your list looks similar to the one I used at Virtus 2016:
Strategist
1 x MC
2 x Pk Elite
2 x Pk
1 x MSwd Impact
1 x MSwd Impact Elite
3 x LI
1 x Ele
Ordinary
2 x Pk Mediocre
1 x MSwd Impact
1 x MSwd Impact Elite
3 x LI
1 x Ele
Ordinary/Included
2 x HC Impact Elite
2 x LC Jav
Corps I is the main punch - going in with the Pk in the open and Ele/MSwd in Fields or Brush. The one MC is capable of slowing outflankers or providing an overlap. The Strategist gives enough PIPs most of the time.
Corps II either joins Corps I's Elephants or takes the other flank of the Pk. The Tarantines protect its open flank and even though Mediocre they are still pretty tough.
Corps III was meant to cover a wide open flank and lose slowly.
On the whole it worked fairly well, only coming unstuck when I was too aggressive with Corps III - lost it and let Cavalry get into the LI that were by then in the rear of the main battle line.
It's not a great army, but the combination of Elephants and powerful Medium Swordsmen makes it fun to use.
Dave |
|
footslogger
Vétéran
Inscrit le: 12 Jan 2015 Messages: 166
|
Posté le: Mer Jan 04, 2017 3:47 pm Sujet du message: |
|
daveallen a écrit: | Your list looks similar to the one I used at Virtus 2016:
Strategist
1 x MC
2 x Pk Elite
2 x Pk
1 x MSwd Impact
1 x MSwd Impact Elite
3 x LI
1 x Ele
Ordinary
2 x Pk Mediocre
1 x MSwd Impact
1 x MSwd Impact Elite
3 x LI
1 x Ele
Ordinary/Included
2 x HC Impact Elite
2 x LC Jav
Corps I is the main punch - going in with the Pk in the open and Ele/MSwd in Fields or Brush. The one MC is capable of slowing outflankers or providing an overlap. The Strategist gives enough PIPs most of the time.
Corps II either joins Corps I's Elephants or takes the other flank of the Pk. The Tarantines protect its open flank and even though Mediocre they are still pretty tough.
Corps III was meant to cover a wide open flank and lose slowly.
On the whole it worked fairly well, only coming unstuck when I was too aggressive with Corps III - lost it and let Cavalry get into the LI that were by then in the rear of the main battle line.
It's not a great army, but the combination of Elephants and powerful Medium Swordsmen makes it fun to use.
Dave |
I only see 2 impact swordsmen allowed in this list? |
|
daveallen
Tribun

Inscrit le: 28 Jan 2016 Messages: 758
Localisation: Rugby & CLWC
|
Posté le: Mer Jan 04, 2017 5:12 pm Sujet du message: |
|
footslogger a écrit: | I only see 2 impact swordsmen allowed in this list? |
Whoops  _________________ Putting the ink into incompetence
Dernière édition par daveallen le Jeu Jan 05, 2017 8:45 am; édité 1 fois |
|
footslogger
Vétéran
Inscrit le: 12 Jan 2015 Messages: 166
|
Posté le: Mer Jan 04, 2017 10:41 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Your list is much better than a legal one. You have my permission to spank the list checker the next time you see him. |
|