Art De La Guerre
Bienvenue sur le forum de discussion de la règle de jeu l'Art De La Guerre
 
FAQFAQ RechercherRechercher Liste des MembresListe des Membres Groupes d'utilisateursGroupes d'utilisateurs S'enregistrerS'enregistrer
ProfilProfil Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés ConnexionConnexion
Cavalry vs LMI
Page 1 sur 1
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules questions V3
Auteur Message
AlanCutner
Tribun


Inscrit le: 03 Nov 2014
Messages: 747
Localisation: Scotland
MessagePosté le: Jeu Juil 06, 2017 9:08 am    Sujet du message: Cavalry vs LMI Répondre en citant
Cavalry without impact get a +1 in first phase against MI. Do they also get this against LMI? Factors against LMI and MI are specifically seperately stated in every other case.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
fdunadan
Tribun


Inscrit le: 12 Juin 2009
Messages: 984
MessagePosté le: Jeu Juil 06, 2017 10:24 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
they get the bonus versus MI and LMI
_________________
Audentes fortuna iuvat.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
ethan
Signifer


Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014
Messages: 354
MessagePosté le: Jeu Juil 06, 2017 11:21 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
This is in the FAQ, but LMI are a sub-category of MI (look at the troop descriptions in the front of the rules).
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Laurence
Archer


Inscrit le: 31 Mar 2017
Messages: 51
MessagePosté le: Ven Juil 14, 2017 8:56 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
ethan a écrit:
This is in the FAQ, but LMI are a sub-category of MI (look at the troop descriptions in the front of the rules).


MI mainly melee troops, LMI mainly missile - therefore it makes sense to distinguish between MI and LMI - as it is in the reference sheet e.g. Light infantry destroyed by LMI, MI,... or Medium cavalry +1 vs LMI, MI,...

Imo, cavarly get the bonus only versus MI types = both medium swordsmen and spearmen.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Ramses II
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015
Messages: 1236
Localisation: London
MessagePosté le: Ven Juil 14, 2017 9:20 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Sorry Lawrence. Unfortunately, this is a common misconception. LMI is a sub-category of MI.

LMI are unarmoured missile troops so they need to be distinguished from their armoured close-quater MI brethren, but otherwise have the same formation density so they are treated the same in all other respects including the penalties for fighting cavalry
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Laurence
Archer


Inscrit le: 31 Mar 2017
Messages: 51
MessagePosté le: Ven Juil 14, 2017 2:51 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Ramses II a écrit:
Sorry Lawrence. Unfortunately, this is a common misconception. LMI is a sub-category of MI.

LMI are unarmoured missile troops so they need to be distinguished from their armoured close-quater MI brethren, but otherwise have the same formation density so they are treated the same in all other respects including the penalties for fighting cavalry


...just wondering why they state in the Reference sheet
Basic factor for Cavalry: +1 vs LMI, MI...
Basic factor for Light infantry: Destroyed in open by LMI, MI...
???

Based on your explanation, makes no sense to mention LMI, as they are included in MI
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
matthieu
Prétorien


Inscrit le: 25 Fév 2009
Messages: 291
Localisation: ales
MessagePosté le: Ven Juil 14, 2017 3:20 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
LMI are LMI , not MI ...
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Laurence
Archer


Inscrit le: 31 Mar 2017
Messages: 51
MessagePosté le: Ven Juil 14, 2017 5:20 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
matthieu a écrit:
LMI are LMI , not MI ...


Exactly, that is what I meant in my reply to Ramses II in form of a question, and in reply to Ethan...LMI is not equal MI

Obviously my comments were not clearly - I have related them always to the inititial question re CV impact bonus vs LMI if yes or not, and LMI as a sub-category of MI, otherwise the differentiation LMI/MI in the Ref sheet would not make sense.

I guess the discussion was finally how to interpretate some of the answers. Sorry if I caused confusion.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Dickstick
Tribun


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016
Messages: 721
Localisation: West Bromwich
MessagePosté le: Ven Juil 14, 2017 8:32 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
I feal your pain
To the French this is simple in french.
To the English they are different beasts thus the different name.
LMI are MI except when they are not. But are MI = LMI ever?

If only MI was written instead of "MI, LMI" we would have consistency.
Instead we have the seed of confusion
_________________
Player 747 don't call me Jumbo
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
ethan
Signifer


Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014
Messages: 354
MessagePosté le: Mer Juil 19, 2017 2:21 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
I then refer you to the FAQ.

+1 bonus from mounted against MI and LMI
Q : If an impact Cv charges medium spearmen, it will lose the Impact. But does she then get the +1 bonus vs Mi
and LMi ?
A : No. This bonus doesn’t apply if the Cv already has Impact.
Q : Is the +1 bonus in the 1st round of the non impact Cv vs Mi/LMi still valid if the unit is attacked in the flank ?
Or if the unit conforms after a melee ?
A : No. Like the Impact capability, it is valid only from the front, and during the charge. Therefore, the
bonus can’t be used if the Cv is attacked from the flank, or if it conforms after a melee.
Q : Do we count this bonus in rough/difficult terrain ?
A : No. This bonus only counts if in open terrain.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Hazelbark
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014
Messages: 1669
MessagePosté le: Mer Juil 19, 2017 3:02 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Dickstick a écrit:

To the English they are different beasts thus the different name.


WRG really did damage to English. But we also have an FAQ that has addressed this point specifically for quite a long time.


Dernière édition par Hazelbark le Mer Juil 19, 2017 6:00 pm; édité 1 fois
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
AntiokosIII
Barbare


Inscrit le: 01 Aoû 2016
Messages: 23
Localisation: Salinas, California, USA
MessagePosté le: Mer Juil 19, 2017 4:02 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
War games rules don't destroy English. Wargamers destroy English. WRG rules were just a tool, that could be used for good or evil.
_________________
Tabletop miniatures are the only completely honorable form of warfare ever invented.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
daveallen
Tribun


Inscrit le: 28 Jan 2016
Messages: 758
Localisation: Rugby & CLWC
MessagePosté le: Jeu Juil 20, 2017 9:15 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Hazelbark a écrit:
Dickstick a écrit:

To the English they are different beasts thus the different name.


WRG really did damage to English. But we also have an FAQ that has addressed this point specifically for quite a long time.

Now that's stretching the definitions of "addressed" and "specifically" quite a bit. Twisted Evil

More accurate may be to say it was covered tangentially Cool
_________________
Putting the ink into incompetence
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Dickstick
Tribun


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016
Messages: 721
Localisation: West Bromwich
MessagePosté le: Lun Aoû 07, 2017 6:15 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
[quote="Hazelbark"][quote="Dickstick"]
To the English they are different beasts thus the different name.
[/quote]

WRG really did damage to English. But we also have an FAQ that has addressed this point specifically for quite a long time.[/quote]

Well two weeks later, I still find this funny.

An American "kettle calling the pot black"

The US has done more damage to English than WRG could ever do.

Any way the issue is LMI was defined more than 40 year ago as faster moving an less disordered troop type in terrain MI, not a looser fighting MI. I first read 4th edition WRG ancients at 16 so definition is older than that.

Old dog new tricks.
Redifining words long used is never easy or to be encouraged
_________________
Player 747 don't call me Jumbo
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
  
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules questions V3
Page 1 sur 1
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet Toutes les heures sont au format GMT

 
Sauter vers:  
Vous ne pouvez pas poster de nouveaux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas éditer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas supprimer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas voter dans les sondages de ce forum