Auteur |
Message |
daveallen
Tribun

Inscrit le: 28 Jan 2016 Messages: 758
Localisation: Rugby & CLWC
|
Posté le: Mer Avr 11, 2018 9:24 am Sujet du message: Flank factors |
|
Knight Units A and Z are in side to side contact after melee (see p. 55)
There are no other units involved.
In its turn A conforms to the flank of Z.Â
 What factors do they fight at?
I think it's 3:2, not 3:0 because
Citation: | Attacked on the flank or rear p56
A unit charged on its flank or rear ... has its basic factor reduced to zero. |
_________________ Putting the ink into incompetence |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Dickstick
Tribun
Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016 Messages: 721
Localisation: West Bromwich
|
Posté le: Mer Avr 11, 2018 2:12 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Unlikely Dave.
But I too am interested know for sure. _________________ Player 747 don't call me Jumbo |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Zoltan
Légat
Inscrit le: 18 Jan 2015 Messages: 500
Localisation: Wellington, New Zealand
|
Posté le: Jeu Avr 12, 2018 7:49 pm Sujet du message: |
|
So when an enemy conforms onto my flank (no other units involved) that is not a charge and so I won’t start at 0?? |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
daveallen
Tribun

Inscrit le: 28 Jan 2016 Messages: 758
Localisation: Rugby & CLWC
|
Posté le: Ven Avr 13, 2018 4:45 am Sujet du message: |
|
That seems so, but it could be a mistranslation or just poor word choice. _________________ Putting the ink into incompetence |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Ramses II
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015 Messages: 1236
Localisation: London
|
Posté le: Ven Avr 13, 2018 11:17 am Sujet du message: |
|
Dave "Eagle eyes" Allen strikes again. Give the man a pint! RAW, that is indeed what it says, but not what was intended. This is really a matter of semantics.
Although we could add this to the ever growing FAQ, could we read the word "charged" as "attacked", so the phrase on p56 becomes Citation: | A unit (except WWg) attacked on its flank or rear . . . |
If so, this will allow everyone to carry on massacring units charged OR CONFORMED in this fashion without being deafened by the rustling of paper . . .
What say you gents? |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
lionelrus
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2009 Messages: 4803
Localisation: paris
|
Posté le: Ven Avr 13, 2018 5:10 pm Sujet du message: |
|
It's one of numerous cases of bad writting of rules... _________________ "Quand on a pas de technique, faut y aller à la zob"
Perceval à Yvain et Gauvain. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Maverick2909
Légionaire
Inscrit le: 01 Juil 2017 Messages: 103
Localisation: Oklahoma City, OK
|
Posté le: Sam Avr 14, 2018 3:19 am Sujet du message: |
|
The real question here is, after unit Z won his combat and followed up, why didn't he conform to unit A for free? You damn well know in unit A's turn he's gonna hit you on the flank anyway so you might as well make it a straight up fight for the two of you instead of taking it in the flank! |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Dickstick
Tribun
Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016 Messages: 721
Localisation: West Bromwich
|
Posté le: Sam Avr 14, 2018 6:39 am Sujet du message: |
|
Z won in his turn so can only stand or pursue one UD forward in his turn. _________________ Player 747 don't call me Jumbo |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Luddite
Archer
Inscrit le: 15 Nov 2017 Messages: 52
|
Posté le: Sam Avr 14, 2018 9:43 am Sujet du message: |
|
Simple amendment to the text, change "charged" to "attacked". Job done.  _________________ http://luddite1811.blogspot.co.uk/ |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Maverick2909
Légionaire
Inscrit le: 01 Juil 2017 Messages: 103
Localisation: Oklahoma City, OK
|
Posté le: Sam Avr 14, 2018 2:31 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Dickstick a écrit: | Z won in his turn so can only stand or pursue one UD forward in his turn. |
You can still conform even in the turn you defeat the unit you are in combat with I believe.
Edit: to be more clear, on page 56 it says “after a route or disengage movement...†thus on Z’s turn right after he made his route pursuit he then has the option to turn on A. At the end of the melee phase A then turns to face Z and they have a normal heads up combat in unit A’s turn. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Ramses II
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015 Messages: 1236
Localisation: London
|
Posté le: Dim Avr 15, 2018 9:37 am Sujet du message: |
|
Nice try Maverick but no, a unit may not pursue up the flank of an enemy before it actually conforms to face that flank.Â
However, I suspect that in game the following occurred. The melee between A an Y was already going on. Z then moved into support by sliding up the flank of A, giving this diag
AAZZ
YY
But too late! Y was destroyed, and after the melee, A conformed on the flank of Z, giving the situation described.Â
Dernière édition par Ramses II le Dim Avr 15, 2018 9:45 am; édité 1 fois |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Zoltan
Légat
Inscrit le: 18 Jan 2015 Messages: 500
Localisation: Wellington, New Zealand
|
Posté le: Dim Avr 15, 2018 9:43 am Sujet du message: |
|
So is the conclusion that whenever a unit is contacted (attacked) on its flank (or rear) by the front edge of an enemy unit, it will always start at factor 0? It doesn't matter if the contact/attack is made by a charge, conform or pursuit move. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Ramses II
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015 Messages: 1236
Localisation: London
|
Posté le: Dim Avr 15, 2018 12:35 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Provided it is is not contacted on its flank by light troops, then yes, the base factor will be reduced to zero. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Maverick2909
Légionaire
Inscrit le: 01 Juil 2017 Messages: 103
Localisation: Oklahoma City, OK
|
Posté le: Dim Avr 15, 2018 2:11 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Ramses please provide evidence of your assertion. From what I’m reading it’s perfectly legal to conform after a route movement.Â
Per page 55 under Conforming after a melee it says “after a route or disengage move a unit may still be in contact with the enemy without being in melee or in a position to support a friend in melee: front corner against front corner or side by side for example.â€Â
It specifically cites that after the rout move you can conform to anyone else you’re in contact with. I don’t see why after the unit routed and Z made his one UD move he isn’t then allowed to conform as per the rules here. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Ramses II
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015 Messages: 1236
Localisation: London
|
Posté le: Dim Avr 15, 2018 5:12 pm Sujet du message: |
|
The wording you quote should be sufficient.Â
Â
In effect by moving forward, the unit has gone past melee into pursuit. (Remember the unit can only pursue at the end of its own move). So it is neither “after a rout†nor “after a disengageâ€.
But, if we consider the diagram above where unit A remains stationary in flank contact with Z, in the movement phase of the following turn it MAY turn for free because this IS Conforming after a melee (the other unit that was in front of it was destroyed).Â
Does that help? |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
|