Auteur |
Message |
vexillia
Centurion

Inscrit le: 21 Nov 2017 Messages: 408
Localisation: Nantwich, UK
|
Posté le: Mar Avr 03, 2018 9:31 pm Sujet du message: Evade Moves & Contractions |
|
Would I be right in assuming that if a group has to contract to get past an obstacle they must do so before they slide or wheel as group contractions cannot be combined with slides and wheels?
Thanks in advance. _________________ Martin Stephenson
Subscribe via email or rss.
Dernière édition par vexillia le Jeu Avr 05, 2018 7:33 pm; édité 1 fois |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
JohnTheBoring
Auxiliaire
Inscrit le: 15 Juil 2015 Messages: 83
Localisation: Wirral
|
Posté le: Mer Avr 04, 2018 12:29 pm Sujet du message: |
|
I don't think you can contract in an evade move. (Wrong rules?)
A contraction can include a wheel as part of the forward move, but not a slide |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
vexillia
Centurion

Inscrit le: 21 Nov 2017 Messages: 408
Localisation: Nantwich, UK
|
Posté le: Mer Avr 04, 2018 1:25 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Evade move & contraction: Page 39, right hand column, first bullet.
You're right you can wheel and contract but in which order? _________________ Martin Stephenson
Subscribe via email or rss. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1669
|
Posté le: Mer Avr 04, 2018 9:10 pm Sujet du message: |
|
vexillia a écrit: | Evade move & contraction: Page 39, right hand column, first bullet.
You're right you can wheel and contract but in which order? |
Left hand bottom
"first slide"
"if not wheel" |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
vexillia
Centurion

Inscrit le: 21 Nov 2017 Messages: 408
Localisation: Nantwich, UK
|
Posté le: Jeu Avr 05, 2018 8:29 am Sujet du message: |
|
Hazelbark a écrit: | Left hand bottom
"first slide"
"if not wheel" |
Not quite. I read this section as slide first and then wheel if necessary. That's different from "if not" which reads like a replacement for the slide.
So back to my original question: when do groups contract (especially as they can't slide and contract in a normal move)? _________________ Martin Stephenson
Subscribe via email or rss. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1669
|
Posté le: Jeu Avr 05, 2018 4:23 pm Sujet du message: |
|
I think I mistook your first question so we are talking past each other. My error.
When contract?
So the bullet you reference says "compelled" I view that as only in situations that require the contraction. Note this is only in an evade so the "no slide with contraction" does not apply. So the below two evader CV needing to pass the 1 UD gap between two Heavy friends would compel a contraction
_CC
H_H |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
vexillia
Centurion

Inscrit le: 21 Nov 2017 Messages: 408
Localisation: Nantwich, UK
|
Posté le: Jeu Avr 05, 2018 4:45 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Hazelbark a écrit: | When contract?
So the bullet you reference says "compelled" I view that as only in situations that require the contraction. Note this is only in an evade so the "no slide with contraction" does not apply. |
I agree on both points. They are both sensible points and consistent with the tone of the rules as written. But the question remains when? In your example there's only one option.
In less clear initial situations there are two possible sequences as one seeks to evade:
- slide, wheel, then finally group contraction
- group contraction, slide then finally wheel
Sadly the text says nothing specific and I was looking for a ruling of sorts. Do we wait for the Technical Committee to drop by or is there an escalation mechanism? _________________ Martin Stephenson
Subscribe via email or rss. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1669
|
Posté le: Jeu Avr 05, 2018 5:45 pm Sujet du message: |
|
I think it is clear:
You start to evade.
The moment you are 1 UD from obstacle you assess (in order)
1) Slide if you can by up to 1 UD
2) "if the obstacle cannot be avoided by a slide, then it can wheel"
3) A group may be compelled to contract. You cannot contract until compelled too.
I do not believe the contract allows you to exceed the 1 UD slide. i.E. the whole group does not slide, then the individual unit does not get an additional contraction. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
vexillia
Centurion

Inscrit le: 21 Nov 2017 Messages: 408
Localisation: Nantwich, UK
|
Posté le: Jeu Avr 05, 2018 5:56 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Hazelbark a écrit: | I think it is clear:
You start to evade.
The moment you are 1 UD from obstacle you assess (in order)
1) Slide if you can by up to 1 UD
2) "if the obstacle cannot be avoided by a slide, then it can wheel"
3) A group may be compelled to contract. You cannot contract until compelled too. |
I agree with the above but I don't think it's clear.
Hazelbark a écrit: | I do not believe the contract allows you to exceed the 1 UD slide. i.E. the whole group does not slide, then the individual unit does not get an additional contraction. |
This is confusing me. Individual units contracting! Care to rephrase? _________________ Martin Stephenson
Subscribe via email or rss. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Zoltan
Légat
Inscrit le: 18 Jan 2015 Messages: 500
Localisation: Wellington, New Zealand
|
Posté le: Jeu Avr 05, 2018 8:02 pm Sujet du message: |
|
[quote="uote] They are both sensible points and consistent with the tone of the rules as written. [/quote]
As an aside, the tone of the rules as translated (from the original tone). To what extent did translators of historical texts impose their own tone (manipulation) on the original work? Subsequent retranslations sometimes uncover this "bias". Just saying...  |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1669
|
Posté le: Jeu Avr 05, 2018 10:37 pm Sujet du message: |
|
vexillia a écrit: |
Hazelbark a écrit: | I do not believe the contract allows you to exceed the 1 UD slide. i.E. the whole group does not slide, then the individual unit does not get an additional contraction. |
This is confusing me. Individual units contracting! Care to rephrase? |
123_ want to evade directly south.
XY_Z Obstacles XY and Z block the direct path of 1 and 2. not there is a 1 UD gap between Y and Z.
3 will move straight. It does not slide
2 can slide and therefore contract behind 3.
1 cannot slide as then it still is blocked.
1 cannot slide with 2, then claim it can contract behind 2 and 3, because that exceeds the 1 UD.
So 1 will have to try to wheel up to 90. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Zoltan
Légat
Inscrit le: 18 Jan 2015 Messages: 500
Localisation: Wellington, New Zealand
|
Posté le: Jeu Avr 05, 2018 11:51 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Hazelbark a écrit: | vexillia a écrit: |
Hazelbark a écrit: | I do not believe the contract allows you to exceed the 1 UD slide. i.E. the whole group does not slide, then the individual unit does not get an additional contraction. |
This is confusing me. Individual units contracting! Care to rephrase? |
123_ want to evade directly south.
XY_Z Obstacles XY and Z block the direct path of 1 and 2. not there is a 1 UD gap between Y and Z.
3 will move straight. It does not slide
2 can slide and therefore contract behind 3.
1 cannot slide as then it still is blocked.
1 cannot slide with 2, then claim it can contract behind 2 and 3, because that exceeds the 1 UD.
So 1 will have to try to wheel up to 90. |
Initially 123 start as a group and throw one die to determine how far their variable evade movement will be. Because they start as a group, presumably all 3 units are obliged to end as a group using whichever mechanism (slide, wheel, contract) is necessary to achieve that? Or can the group break up mid-evade (slip sliding away) but each unit still using the same previously determined variable movement distance? Alternatively, each unit might need to evade individually or as sub groups (with separate variable movement dice rolls) if their movement options don't allow them to end as a group. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
hcaille
Administrateur

Inscrit le: 20 Mai 2008 Messages: 2547
Localisation: Lyon
|
Posté le: Ven Avr 06, 2018 7:04 am Sujet du message: |
|
Hello
When a group have to evade, it had to be made in the most logical way.
The example below is right :
[quote
]123_ want to evade directly south.
XY_Z Obstacles XY and Z block the direct path of 1 and 2. not there is a 1 UD gap between Y and Z.
3 will move straight. It does not slide
2 can slide and therefore contract behind 3.
1 cannot slide as then it still is blocked.
1 cannot slide with 2, then claim it can contract behind 2 and 3, because that exceeds the 1 UD.
So 1 will have to try to wheel up to 90.[/quote]
Precisions :
- If a group evade, you throw only one dicto adjust the distance but it is possible that units will be separated after the evade move
- For each unit, you proceed in the following order :
1 - Slide
2 - Wheel if slide is not sufficient
- If necessary a group can contract to pass through a gap. The units at the rear move less so they can be ctach by the cherger. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Zoltan
Légat
Inscrit le: 18 Jan 2015 Messages: 500
Localisation: Wellington, New Zealand
|
Posté le: Ven Avr 06, 2018 7:27 am Sujet du message: |
|
hcaille a écrit: | Hello
When a group have to evade, it had to be made in the most logical way.
The example below is right :
[quote
]123_ want to evade directly south.
XY_Z Obstacles XY and Z block the direct path of 1 and 2. not there is a 1 UD gap between Y and Z.
3 will move straight. It does not slide
2 can slide and therefore contract behind 3.
1 cannot slide as then it still is blocked.
1 cannot slide with 2, then claim it can contract behind 2 and 3, because that exceeds the 1 UD.
So 1 will have to try to wheel up to 90. |
Precisions :
- If a group evade, you throw only one dicto adjust the distance but it is possible that units will be separated after the evade move
- For each unit, you proceed in the following order :
1 - Slide
2 - Wheel if slide is not sufficient
- If necessary a group can contract to pass through a gap. The units at the rear move less so they can be ctach by the cherger.[/quote]
Merci monsieur!
So one die roll for the group, but it is possible that the group may split up as a result of each unit makes its own legal evade move. It is clear. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
vexillia
Centurion

Inscrit le: 21 Nov 2017 Messages: 408
Localisation: Nantwich, UK
|
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
|