bodoli
Javelinier
Inscrit le: 20 Aoû 2018
Messages: 16
Localisation: Koblenz, Germany
|
 Posté le: Sam Juin 05, 2021 11:55 am Sujet du message: ** Cancels impact |
 |
Hi @ all
Okay, there are hardly any impetuous infantry in the army lists which are not impetuous swordsmen.
The QRS states "** Cancels impact of impetuous swordsmen if receiving the charge on its front."
Page 13 of the Rules says: "... cancels impact of impetuous infantry if receiving the charge on its front."
Which one is right? |
|
fdunadan
Tribun
Inscrit le: 12 Juin 2009
Messages: 984
|
| Posté le: Sam Juin 05, 2021 3:28 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Both 
In French " Piétons" is the generic term for foot troops, so infantry.
The MI and HI are separated in "Fantassin" or "Lancier" so swordmen and spearmen.
there is only impetuous swordmen.
and in the French version, the term "Piétons" is always used.
_________________
Audentes fortuna iuvat. |
|
lionelrus
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2009
Messages: 4805
Localisation: paris
|
| Posté le: Sam Juin 05, 2021 6:05 pm Sujet du message: |
|
there is no impetuous infantry except swordmen; So 2 sentences, same meaning.
_________________
"Quand on a pas de technique, faut y aller à la zob"
Perceval à Yvain et Gauvain. |
|
Mike Bennett
Légat
Inscrit le: 11 Nov 2017
Messages: 583
Localisation: Carnforth, Lancashire, UK
|
| Posté le: Sam Juin 05, 2021 7:33 pm Sujet du message: |
|
| lionelrus a écrit: | | there is no impetuous infantry except swordmen; So 2 sentences, same meaning. |
I thought that there are also impetuous levy? |
|
fdunadan
Tribun
Inscrit le: 12 Juin 2009
Messages: 984
|
| Posté le: Sam Juin 05, 2021 8:04 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Yes and they're HI too.
_________________
Audentes fortuna iuvat. |
|
Mike Bennett
Légat
Inscrit le: 11 Nov 2017
Messages: 583
Localisation: Carnforth, Lancashire, UK
|
| Posté le: Sam Juin 05, 2021 8:59 pm Sujet du message: |
|
| bodoli a écrit: | Hi @ all
Okay, there are hardly any impetuous infantry in the army lists which are not impetuous swordsmen.
The QRS states "** Cancels impact of impetuous swordsmen if receiving the charge on its front."
Page 13 of the Rules says: "... cancels impact of impetuous infantry if receiving the charge on its front."
Which one is right? |
I believe that the rules book trumps the QRS, except the one about cavalry v medium swordsmen / spearmen already clarified as an error. |
|
lionelrus
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2009
Messages: 4805
Localisation: paris
|
| Posté le: Dim Juin 06, 2021 7:07 pm Sujet du message: |
|
| Mike Bennett a écrit: | | bodoli a écrit: | Hi @ all
Okay, there are hardly any impetuous infantry in the army lists which are not impetuous swordsmen.
The QRS states "** Cancels impact of impetuous swordsmen if receiving the charge on its front."
Page 13 of the Rules says: "... cancels impact of impetuous infantry if receiving the charge on its front."
Which one is right? |
I believe that the rules book trumps the QRS, except the one about cavalry v medium swordsmen / spearmen already clarified as an error. |
Or use original french version, qrs is ok!
_________________
"Quand on a pas de technique, faut y aller à la zob"
Perceval à Yvain et Gauvain. |
|
FAQ
Rechercher
Liste des Membres
Groupes d'utilisateurs
S'enregistrer
Profil
Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés
Connexion
