Art De La Guerre
Bienvenue sur le forum de discussion de la règle de jeu l'Art De La Guerre
 
FAQFAQ RechercherRechercher Liste des MembresListe des Membres Groupes d'utilisateursGroupes d'utilisateurs S'enregistrerS'enregistrer
ProfilProfil Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés ConnexionConnexion
Light horse overhead shooting
Page 1 sur 1
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules question V4
Auteur Message
Mike Bennett
Légat


Inscrit le: 11 Nov 2017
Messages: 583
Localisation: Carnforth, Lancashire, UK
MessagePosté le: Sam Mai 08, 2021 2:42 pm    Sujet du message: Light horse overhead shooting Répondre en citant
There is an interesting change to light horse overhead shooting wording. Previously the supporting shooter had to be aligned “behindâ€, but this is no longer necessary, it simply needs to “face in the same directionâ€.

This implies that overhead shooting can be in any direction, including to the flank or rear. E.g. with a 2 wiide group the further “column†could shoot sideways over the nearest column. Anyone disagree with the reading, and is that the intention?

AB
CD Target
EF

A, C and E can shoot over B, D and F so all 6 are eligible to shoot
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Longtooth
Signifer


Inscrit le: 14 Oct 2014
Messages: 357
Localisation: Oxford
MessagePosté le: Sam Mai 08, 2021 4:43 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Hi Mike,

The same bullet point requires the LH to be "aligned front corner to rear corner and facing the same direction". In my mind, that is the same as saying 'behind'.

Although I would not care if my opponent chose to fire forwards or backwards within a column comprised of two LH, I think firing over an adjacent column is not possible in the context of the front corner to rear corner requirement.

Jesse
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Ramses II
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015
Messages: 1236
Localisation: London
MessagePosté le: Sam Mai 08, 2021 9:35 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
The wording has changed slightly to clarify the intent, but the rule is unchanged; the units have to be aligned and facing in the same direction, the same as V3.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Mike Bennett
Légat


Inscrit le: 11 Nov 2017
Messages: 583
Localisation: Carnforth, Lancashire, UK
MessagePosté le: Sam Mai 08, 2021 9:51 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Ramses II a écrit:
The wording has changed slightly to clarify the intent, but the rule is unchanged; the units have to be aligned and facing in the same direction, the same as V3.


Why do you say that the meaning is unchanged? In v3 the supporting shooter had to be “behindâ€, but v4 removes that limitation, allowing an extra option. I.e v4 wording allows a front rank to shoot backwards from infront, not behind, over a rear rank
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
madaxeman
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 01 Nov 2014
Messages: 1599
Localisation: Londres Centraal.
MessagePosté le: Sam Mai 08, 2021 11:00 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
(duplicate)
_________________
www.madaxeman.com
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé Visiter le site web de l'utilisateur
madaxeman
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 01 Nov 2014
Messages: 1599
Localisation: Londres Centraal.
MessagePosté le: Sam Mai 08, 2021 11:00 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Mike Bennett a écrit:
Ramses II a écrit:
The wording has changed slightly to clarify the intent, but the rule is unchanged; the units have to be aligned and facing in the same direction, the same as V3.


Why do you say that the meaning is unchanged? In v3 the supporting shooter had to be “behindâ€, but v4 removes that limitation, allowing an extra option. I.e v4 wording allows a front rank to shoot backwards from infront, not behind, over a rear rank


Gavin is saying that they have to be one behind the other, tidily arranged, both facing in the same direction.

That was true in v3, its still true in v4 but is more explicitly spelled out to frustrate people who may have tried to bend the rules in v3 by trying to claim that two units "back to back" could still shoot in support of each other.

The phrase about shooting from the "front or rear edge" is new wording, and is there (I believe) to clear up another DBx-era-rules-laywer tortuously semantically arguable "ambiguity" in v3 in which some people tried to argue that the "front edge" could be dyamically defined as the the "shooting edge" of a unit duing the shooting phase.
_________________
www.madaxeman.com
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé Visiter le site web de l'utilisateur
Mike Bennett
Légat


Inscrit le: 11 Nov 2017
Messages: 583
Localisation: Carnforth, Lancashire, UK
MessagePosté le: Dim Mai 09, 2021 8:01 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
madaxeman a écrit:
Mike Bennett a écrit:
Ramses II a écrit:
The wording has changed slightly to clarify the intent, but the rule is unchanged; the units have to be aligned and facing in the same direction, the same as V3.


Why do you say that the meaning is unchanged? In v3 the supporting shooter had to be “behindâ€, but v4 removes that limitation, allowing an extra option. I.e v4 wording allows a front rank to shoot backwards from infront, not behind, over a rear rank


Gavin is saying that they have to be one behind the other, tidily arranged, both facing in the same direction.

That was true in v3, its still true in v4 but is more explicitly spelled out to frustrate people who may have tried to bend the rules in v3 by trying to claim that two units "back to back" could still shoot in support of each other.

The phrase about shooting from the "front or rear edge" is new wording, and is there (I believe) to clear up another DBx-era-rules-laywer tortuously semantically arguable "ambiguity" in v3 in which some people tried to argue that the "front edge" could be dyamically defined as the the "shooting edge" of a unit duing the shooting phase.


Agreed. And in v4 they can shoot overhead from behind (ie forward) like in v3, AND also, new to V4, from infront (ie to the rear). But as you say, no dynamic front edge, so not to the side. In any case overhead shooting is pretty rare. LH are normally best side by side, not one behind the other
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
hcaille
Administrateur


Inscrit le: 20 Mai 2008
Messages: 2547
Localisation: Lyon
MessagePosté le: Ven Mai 14, 2021 6:04 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
The only change in V4 is that one LH can support shooting from the rear or from the front.
2 LH side by side cannot shoot over

Target ... AABB

BB cannot shoot over AA to support shooting against the target
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé Envoyer un e-mail Visiter le site web de l'utilisateur
MC_Delicatessen
Auxiliaire


Inscrit le: 30 Juil 2020
Messages: 87
MessagePosté le: Ven Mai 14, 2021 9:47 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
hcaille a écrit:
The only change in V4 is that one LH can support shooting from the rear or from the front.
2 LH side by side cannot shoot over

Target ... AABB

BB cannot shoot over AA to support shooting against the target



Here, BB is aligned front left corner to the rear right corner of AA.

Target
-------AA--
----------BB

Can you confirm that BB cannot support shoot overhead in this case, or can it...?
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Hazelbark
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014
Messages: 1669
MessagePosté le: Lun Mai 17, 2021 7:49 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
It obviously does not work that way.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
  
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules question V4
Page 1 sur 1
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet Toutes les heures sont au format GMT

 
Sauter vers:  
Vous ne pouvez pas poster de nouveaux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas éditer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas supprimer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas voter dans les sondages de ce forum