MC_Delicatessen
Auxiliaire
Inscrit le: 30 Juil 2020 Messages: 87
|
Posté le: Dim Mai 16, 2021 11:56 am Sujet du message: QRS cataphracts vs Kn |
|
p16 says cataphracts lose their impact against Kn with impact.
The QRS says cataphracts have "No impact vs Kn".
This is a typo presumably and the book is correct - the QRS should say "No impact vs Kn impact", right? |
|
Commodore
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 23 Aoû 2012 Messages: 1238
Localisation: London
|
Posté le: Dim Mai 16, 2021 12:30 pm Sujet du message: |
|
correct ! _________________ "Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead"
Cdr Farragut,Mobile 1864 |
|
Dickstick
Tribun
Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016 Messages: 721
Localisation: West Bromwich
|
Posté le: Dim Mai 16, 2021 1:40 pm Sujet du message: |
|
And then p22 needs modification _________________ Player 747 don't call me Jumbo |
|
madaxeman
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 01 Nov 2014 Messages: 1599
Localisation: Londres Centraal.
|
Posté le: Dim Mai 16, 2021 9:18 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Dickstick a écrit: | And then p22 needs modification |
Only if anyone ever chooses to field any units of Knights without Impact ...  _________________ www.madaxeman.com |
|
Dickstick
Tribun
Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016 Messages: 721
Localisation: West Bromwich
|
Posté le: Lun Mai 17, 2021 7:32 am Sujet du message: |
|
Why "correct " 2/3 of entries?
Especially in book. QRS can be short hand memory aid but not the book.
Keep room for a 5 minute pointless argument? _________________ Player 747 don't call me Jumbo |
|
hcaille
Administrateur

Inscrit le: 20 Mai 2008 Messages: 2547
Localisation: Lyon
|
Posté le: Mar Juin 08, 2021 6:24 am Sujet du message: |
|
The complete rules is in page 15-16.
Page 22 and in QRS there is not enough room to repeat all the sentence ... |
|