Art De La Guerre
Bienvenue sur le forum de discussion de la règle de jeu l'Art De La Guerre
 
FAQFAQ RechercherRechercher Liste des MembresListe des Membres Groupes d'utilisateursGroupes d'utilisateurs S'enregistrerS'enregistrer
ProfilProfil Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés ConnexionConnexion
simultaneous simple and melee support
Page 1 sur 1
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules question V4
Auteur Message
Za Otlichiye
Signifer


Inscrit le: 07 Sep 2021
Messages: 341
Localisation: Lovecraft country (and you Dan?)
MessagePosté le: Mer Mar 23, 2022 9:53 pm    Sujet du message: simultaneous simple and melee support Répondre en citant
This question has been kicked around FB and probably deserves a formal enquiry.

A unit finds itself in the improbable position of qualifying for simple support in one melee and melee support in another melee. Does the unit:
1. count for simple support in one melee and melee support in the other?.
2. count for simple support or melee support, but not both - player's choice?
3. count for melee support only?
4. count for simple support only?
5 something else?


Dernière édition par Za Otlichiye le Sam Mar 26, 2022 4:44 am; édité 2 fois
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Dickstick
Légat


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016
Messages: 680
Localisation: West Bromwich
MessagePosté le: Jeu Mar 24, 2022 8:23 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
I can't find a reason on p60 why it cannot count both.

What was the counter reasoning?
_________________
Player 747 don't call me Jumbo
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Za Otlichiye
Signifer


Inscrit le: 07 Sep 2021
Messages: 341
Localisation: Lovecraft country (and you Dan?)
MessagePosté le: Jeu Mar 24, 2022 2:08 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Some thought "Support units can be either simple support or melee support" was an exclusive disjunction. Others felt "that are not in melee with another enemy" was perhaps intended as "not in melee or melee support with another enemy".
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Dickstick
Légat


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016
Messages: 680
Localisation: West Bromwich
MessagePosté le: Jeu Mar 24, 2022 11:33 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Up hill in a wood.
Does this only be uphill or in a wood but not both.?
A unit placed such is in both places and gets all plus and minus effects of being in both.

Melee and melee support or defined as different things on p60.

Simple support and melee are both support and are not in melee, only the main unit is in melee and it cannot give support.

A unit ca be in both support positions but it's rare as you implied.

"Intended" is conjecture and that will lead all rules to be binned eventually.
_________________
Player 747 don't call me Jumbo
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Za Otlichiye
Signifer


Inscrit le: 07 Sep 2021
Messages: 341
Localisation: Lovecraft country (and you Dan?)
MessagePosté le: Ven Mar 25, 2022 12:30 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
All true but not enough to persuade the various, strongly held opinions, so a clarification would be helpful. The only route I know of is announcing it here and waiting patiently.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Mike Bennett
Centurion


Inscrit le: 11 Nov 2017
Messages: 490
Localisation: Carnforth, Lancashire, UK
MessagePosté le: Ven Mar 25, 2022 3:38 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
I do not have the rules to handle but from memory melee support counts as being in melee. E.g. if hit in the flank or rear a melee support unit takes a hit for being in melee, whereas a simple support unit does not.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Zoltan
Centurion


Inscrit le: 18 Jan 2015
Messages: 443
Localisation: Wellington, New Zealand
MessagePosté le: Ven Mar 25, 2022 4:58 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
P.60 General Rules para 1 makes it clear that units in contact with an enemy will fall into one of 3 categories:
1. In melee
2. In simple support
3. In melee support

Ipso facto a support unit is NOT “in meleeâ€.

P.60 Melee and Support paras confirm that it is the main unit that is “in melee†and able to be supported by units NOT in melee.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Dickstick
Légat


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016
Messages: 680
Localisation: West Bromwich
MessagePosté le: Ven Mar 25, 2022 8:19 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Mike Bennett a écrit:
I do not have the rules to handle but from memory melee support counts as being in melee. E.g. if hit in the flank or rear a melee support unit takes a hit for being in melee, whereas a simple support unit does not.


Ah, yes the diagram p66 contradiction of p60 definitions.

A contradiction not good enough for pursuit definitions for p69 that official errata to bullet points 6 and 7 were issued September 2021 keeping to definitions p60.
_________________
Player 747 don't call me Jumbo
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Hazelbark
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014
Messages: 1544
MessagePosté le: Sam Mar 26, 2022 1:39 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Mike Bennett a écrit:
I do not have the rules to handle but from memory melee support counts as being in melee. E.g. if hit in the flank or rear a melee support unit takes a hit for being in melee, whereas a simple support unit does not.


So page 60 under "melee" first sentence reads, "A unit is in melee when it is the main unit in a combat. The other units are in support."

I think without the rules you are merging v3 and v4 and multiple attacks with melee.

The loss of the cohesion is specified on p61 under multiple attacks.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Hazelbark
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014
Messages: 1544
MessagePosté le: Sam Mar 26, 2022 1:41 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Dickstick a écrit:

Ah, yes the diagram p66 contradiction of p60 definitions.

A contradiction not good enough for pursuit definitions for p69 that official errata to bullet points 6 and 7 were issued September 2021 keeping to definitions p60.


Can you walk me through what you are seeing here. I am not following it clearly.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
daveallen
Tribun


Inscrit le: 28 Jan 2016
Messages: 742
Localisation: Rugby & CLWC
MessagePosté le: Mer Mar 30, 2022 4:59 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Za Otlichiye a écrit:
All true but not enough to persuade the various, strongly held opinions, so a clarification would be helpful. The only route I know of is announcing it here and waiting patiently.

No clarification is needed. The construction using "either/or" is unambiguous.

After initial confusion on the facebook page it was accepted that a unit in a melee support position cannot provide simple support to another unit.

Dave
_________________
Putting the ink into incompetence
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Za Otlichiye
Signifer


Inscrit le: 07 Sep 2021
Messages: 341
Localisation: Lovecraft country (and you Dan?)
MessagePosté le: Mer Mar 30, 2022 6:11 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
daveallen a écrit:
Za Otlichiye a écrit:
All true but not enough to persuade the various, strongly held opinions, so a clarification would be helpful. The only route I know of is announcing it here and waiting patiently.

No clarification is needed. The construction using "either/or" is unambiguous.

After initial confusion on the facebook page it was accepted that a unit in a melee support position cannot provide simple support to another unit.

Dave


Nonsense.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
  
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules question V4
Page 1 sur 1
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet Toutes les heures sont au format GMT

 
Sauter vers:  
Vous ne pouvez pas poster de nouveaux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas éditer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas supprimer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas voter dans les sondages de ce forum