Auteur |
Message |
Za Otlichiye
Signifer
Inscrit le: 07 Sep 2021 Messages: 341
Localisation: Lovecraft country (and you Dan?)
|
Posté le: Mer Mar 23, 2022 9:53 pm Sujet du message: simultaneous simple and melee support |
|
This question has been kicked around FB and probably deserves a formal enquiry.
A unit finds itself in the improbable position of qualifying for simple support in one melee and melee support in another melee. Does the unit:
1. count for simple support in one melee and melee support in the other?.
2. count for simple support or melee support, but not both - player's choice?
3. count for melee support only?
4. count for simple support only?
5 something else?
Dernière édition par Za Otlichiye le Sam Mar 26, 2022 4:44 am; édité 2 fois |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Dickstick
Tribun
Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016 Messages: 721
Localisation: West Bromwich
|
Posté le: Jeu Mar 24, 2022 8:23 am Sujet du message: |
|
I can't find a reason on p60 why it cannot count both.
What was the counter reasoning? _________________ Player 747 don't call me Jumbo |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Za Otlichiye
Signifer
Inscrit le: 07 Sep 2021 Messages: 341
Localisation: Lovecraft country (and you Dan?)
|
Posté le: Jeu Mar 24, 2022 2:08 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Some thought "Support units can be either simple support or melee support" was an exclusive disjunction. Others felt "that are not in melee with another enemy" was perhaps intended as "not in melee or melee support with another enemy". |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Dickstick
Tribun
Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016 Messages: 721
Localisation: West Bromwich
|
Posté le: Jeu Mar 24, 2022 11:33 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Up hill in a wood.
Does this only be uphill or in a wood but not both.?
A unit placed such is in both places and gets all plus and minus effects of being in both.
Melee and melee support or defined as different things on p60.
Simple support and melee are both support and are not in melee, only the main unit is in melee and it cannot give support.
A unit ca be in both support positions but it's rare as you implied.
"Intended" is conjecture and that will lead all rules to be binned eventually. _________________ Player 747 don't call me Jumbo |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Za Otlichiye
Signifer
Inscrit le: 07 Sep 2021 Messages: 341
Localisation: Lovecraft country (and you Dan?)
|
Posté le: Ven Mar 25, 2022 12:30 am Sujet du message: |
|
All true but not enough to persuade the various, strongly held opinions, so a clarification would be helpful. The only route I know of is announcing it here and waiting patiently. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Mike Bennett
Légat
Inscrit le: 11 Nov 2017 Messages: 583
Localisation: Carnforth, Lancashire, UK
|
Posté le: Ven Mar 25, 2022 3:38 am Sujet du message: |
|
I do not have the rules to handle but from memory melee support counts as being in melee. E.g. if hit in the flank or rear a melee support unit takes a hit for being in melee, whereas a simple support unit does not. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Zoltan
Légat
Inscrit le: 18 Jan 2015 Messages: 500
Localisation: Wellington, New Zealand
|
Posté le: Ven Mar 25, 2022 4:58 am Sujet du message: |
|
P.60 General Rules para 1 makes it clear that units in contact with an enemy will fall into one of 3 categories:
1. In melee
2. In simple support
3. In melee support
Ipso facto a support unit is NOT “in meleeâ€.
P.60 Melee and Support paras confirm that it is the main unit that is “in melee†and able to be supported by units NOT in melee. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Dickstick
Tribun
Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016 Messages: 721
Localisation: West Bromwich
|
Posté le: Ven Mar 25, 2022 8:19 am Sujet du message: |
|
Mike Bennett a écrit: | I do not have the rules to handle but from memory melee support counts as being in melee. E.g. if hit in the flank or rear a melee support unit takes a hit for being in melee, whereas a simple support unit does not. |
Ah, yes the diagram p66 contradiction of p60 definitions.
A contradiction not good enough for pursuit definitions for p69 that official errata to bullet points 6 and 7 were issued September 2021 keeping to definitions p60. _________________ Player 747 don't call me Jumbo |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1669
|
Posté le: Sam Mar 26, 2022 1:39 am Sujet du message: |
|
Mike Bennett a écrit: | I do not have the rules to handle but from memory melee support counts as being in melee. E.g. if hit in the flank or rear a melee support unit takes a hit for being in melee, whereas a simple support unit does not. |
So page 60 under "melee" first sentence reads, "A unit is in melee when it is the main unit in a combat. The other units are in support."
I think without the rules you are merging v3 and v4 and multiple attacks with melee.
The loss of the cohesion is specified on p61 under multiple attacks. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1669
|
Posté le: Sam Mar 26, 2022 1:41 am Sujet du message: |
|
Dickstick a écrit: |
Ah, yes the diagram p66 contradiction of p60 definitions.
A contradiction not good enough for pursuit definitions for p69 that official errata to bullet points 6 and 7 were issued September 2021 keeping to definitions p60. |
Can you walk me through what you are seeing here. I am not following it clearly. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
daveallen
Tribun

Inscrit le: 28 Jan 2016 Messages: 758
Localisation: Rugby & CLWC
|
Posté le: Mer Mar 30, 2022 4:59 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Za Otlichiye a écrit: | All true but not enough to persuade the various, strongly held opinions, so a clarification would be helpful. The only route I know of is announcing it here and waiting patiently. |
No clarification is needed. The construction using "either/or" is unambiguous.
After initial confusion on the facebook page it was accepted that a unit in a melee support position cannot provide simple support to another unit.
Dave _________________ Putting the ink into incompetence |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Za Otlichiye
Signifer
Inscrit le: 07 Sep 2021 Messages: 341
Localisation: Lovecraft country (and you Dan?)
|
Posté le: Mer Mar 30, 2022 6:11 pm Sujet du message: |
|
daveallen a écrit: | Za Otlichiye a écrit: | All true but not enough to persuade the various, strongly held opinions, so a clarification would be helpful. The only route I know of is announcing it here and waiting patiently. |
No clarification is needed. The construction using "either/or" is unambiguous.
After initial confusion on the facebook page it was accepted that a unit in a melee support position cannot provide simple support to another unit.
Dave |
Nonsense. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
|