KevinD
Légat
Inscrit le: 23 Aoû 2021 Messages: 647
Localisation: Texas
|
Posté le: Dim Oct 16, 2022 11:27 pm Sujet du message: Weak Bows (Mounted) - speculative |
|
What if lancers Mc/HC Impact or Impetuous) armed with bows, but who were noted to make only limited use of the latter or whose bows or archery were described as ‘Weakâ€, such as Tibetans, Sarmatians, 16 Kingdoms/Northern Dynasties Chinese (including Xiongnu and Xienbei) and maybe nomads like Khazar or Bulgar nobles or Khitans were allowed to be HC/MC Impact or Impetuous 1/2 Bw? Was their effect similar to Byzantine or Jurchen formations of mixed lancers and and armored horse archers? |
|
ethan
Signifer
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 354
|
Posté le: Sam Oct 22, 2022 1:59 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Part of the problem here is that HC/MC Impact is IMO a weak troop type. HC/MC Impact 1/2 Bow IMO is quite worthwhile - because it can evade more than because it can shoot. The solution is to let impact cavalry evade not make more 1/2 bow.
The impetuous troops have tended to work better, they are cheaper and often IMO found in armies that support them better, tending to be larger armies with lots of less expensive troops. The combo of impetuous cavalry and impetuous Hvy Sw is a good one. |
|
Jhykronos
Auxiliaire
Inscrit le: 02 Aoû 2015 Messages: 95
|
Posté le: Mer Jan 25, 2023 9:18 am Sujet du message: |
|
KevinD a écrit: | What if lancers Mc/HC Impact or Impetuous) armed with bows, but who were noted to make only limited use of the latter or whose bows or archery were described as ‘Weakâ€, such as Tibetans, Sarmatians, 16 Kingdoms/Northern Dynasties Chinese (including Xiongnu and Xienbei) and maybe nomads like Khazar or Bulgar nobles or Khitans were allowed to be HC/MC Impact or Impetuous 1/2 Bw? Was their effect similar to Byzantine or Jurchen formations of mixed lancers and and armored horse archers? |
Medieval Lithuanians, too. Medium Cavalry, Javelin is an odd classification for those guys. _________________ - Let the Die be Cast |
|