Art De La Guerre
Bienvenue sur le forum de discussion de la règle de jeu l'Art De La Guerre
 
FAQFAQ RechercherRechercher Liste des MembresListe des Membres Groupes d'utilisateursGroupes d'utilisateurs S'enregistrerS'enregistrer
ProfilProfil Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés ConnexionConnexion
List 179 Normans
Page 1 sur 1
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Army lists
Auteur Message
AlanCutner
Tribun


Inscrit le: 03 Nov 2014
Messages: 710
Localisation: Scotland
MessagePosté le: Mer Juin 28, 2023 7:42 pm    Sujet du message: List 179 Normans Répondre en citant
William the Conquerer in 1066 gets to replace 1/3-2/3 mounted knights to dismounted heavy spearmen. There is an option to upgrade to elite. But this option is limited by the statement "max 8 in total". If the upgrade was limited to just the spearmen I would expect the limitation to be just "max 8". By adding "in total" it implies the limit of 8 is shared across other troops, and the only possibility is the mounted knights.

So is it correct that Williams Normans in 1066 are limited to just 8 elites across both mounted and dismounted? If not what does the "in total" mean?
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Three
Vétéran


Inscrit le: 20 Déc 2017
Messages: 180
MessagePosté le: Jeu Juin 29, 2023 8:47 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
FWIW - my view is that if you take the William/1066 option then only 8 Normans* in total can be upgraded to elite.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
madaxeman
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 01 Nov 2014
Messages: 1468
Localisation: Londres Centraal.
MessagePosté le: Jeu Juin 29, 2023 12:24 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
I've always assumed that the total number of elite Normans doesn't change, irrespective of whether they are turning up on foot or on horseback for any given battle.
_________________
www.madaxeman.com
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé Visiter le site web de l'utilisateur
AlanCutner
Tribun


Inscrit le: 03 Nov 2014
Messages: 710
Localisation: Scotland
MessagePosté le: Jeu Juin 29, 2023 2:21 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
madaxeman a écrit:
I've always assumed that the total number of elite Normans doesn't change, irrespective of whether they are turning up on foot or on horseback for any given battle.

That was my assumption until I read the list in more detail. Not convinced its correct.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Jhykronos
Auxiliaire


Inscrit le: 02 Aoû 2015
Messages: 95
MessagePosté le: Jeu Juin 29, 2023 8:03 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
madaxeman a écrit:
I've always assumed that the total number of elite Normans doesn't change, irrespective of whether they are turning up on foot or on horseback for any given battle.


Seems to be the most straightforward interpretation. Though it is kind of odd that William the Bastard gets less elite knights than any of his predecessors.

Then again, it's also kind of odd that he's only a strategist in 1066... dude had a very solid military record up to that point, IIRC.
_________________
- Let the Die be Cast
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé Adresse AIM
Three
Vétéran


Inscrit le: 20 Déc 2017
Messages: 180
MessagePosté le: Ven Juin 30, 2023 9:47 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Jhykronos a écrit:
madaxeman a écrit:
I've always assumed that the total number of elite Normans doesn't change, irrespective of whether they are turning up on foot or on horseback for any given battle.


Seems to be the most straightforward interpretation. Though it is kind of odd that William the Bastard gets less elite knights than any of his predecessors.

Then again, it's also kind of odd that he's only a strategist in 1066... dude had a very solid military record up to that point, IIRC.


It's straightforward only if you ignore the "max 8 in total" bit.

Not looking for an argument here, but both things can't be true at the same time?
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Hazelbark
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014
Messages: 1537
MessagePosté le: Ven Juin 30, 2023 9:00 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
I don't know how else to interp Max in total. It has a clear meaning elsewhere, why not here?
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Mike Bennett
Centurion


Inscrit le: 11 Nov 2017
Messages: 489
Localisation: Carnforth, Lancashire, UK
MessagePosté le: Jeu Juil 06, 2023 7:11 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
I am confused on the answer, as some replies here seem inconsistent between the cited text and the coments.

So is max 8:
1. Mounted and foot
2. Foot armoured and unarmoured
3 ......
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
AlanCutner
Tribun


Inscrit le: 03 Nov 2014
Messages: 710
Localisation: Scotland
MessagePosté le: Jeu Juil 06, 2023 8:27 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Mike Bennett a écrit:
I am confused on the answer, as some replies here seem inconsistent between the cited text and the coments.

So is max 8:
1. Mounted and foot
2. Foot armoured and unarmoured
3 ......

For William in 1066 there is a max 8 elite Normans - mounted or dismounted. In all other cases there is no option to dismount, but all the mounted Normans can be elite.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
SteveR
Prétorien


Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2018
Messages: 284
MessagePosté le: Dim Fév 04, 2024 3:15 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Hazelbark a écrit:
I don't know how else to interp Max in total. It has a clear meaning elsewhere, why not here?


Hi Dan,

I'm not sure that the words "in total" have a clear meaning at all. They seem superfluous.

If they had meaning then there would be a difference between, say list 108 and 109.

In 108, Alans, the base horsemen may have 0-8 elites. And the upgrade specifies 0-8 may be upgraded "in total"

In list 109 the verbiage is different. The base list may have max 4 Asavaran upgraded. The replacement may have max 8 without the words "in total" used.

So what is the practical difference? Is the omission of "in total" here deliberate? Are the words "in total" ever needed?

Because page 87 is pretty explicit that when there is an upgrade you don't get to add the two maximums together.

But it is not clear to me what was intended. Probably the Max 8 in the Norman list is a total replacement including both mounted and dismounted. However the Norman replacement line is pretty unique as I posted elsewhere. So a unique construction of replacement here would not offend me - it is a special case.

Maybe I need a copy of the rules in French to help. For last weeks game I cut the Gordian knot by just not taking any elites. But like Alexander that trick only works once and I should have upgraded my included general (at least)
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
  
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Army lists
Page 1 sur 1
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet Toutes les heures sont au format GMT

 
Sauter vers:  
Vous ne pouvez pas poster de nouveaux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas éditer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas supprimer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas voter dans les sondages de ce forum