| Auteur |
Message |
Sujet: Charge and evade |
Neep
Réponses: 4
Vus: 226
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Lun Mar 09, 2026 6:07 pm Sujet: Charge and evade |
I believe it has the choice if it is not impetuous, so long as it charges minimum distance.
The rules are very unclear on this. I have only found the diagram on page 44 to give any indication.
I th ... |
Sujet: Trapped General |
Neep
Réponses: 3
Vus: 146
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Lun Mar 02, 2026 11:52 pm Sujet: Trapped General |
| I would say not only can they not move 5UD, they cannot even be placed on the table. Killed if the enemy pursues, otherwise captured, not that it makes any difference except perhaps in a campaign game ... |
Sujet: Charge and conformation |
Neep
Réponses: 13
Vus: 697
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Lun Fév 09, 2026 4:09 pm Sujet: Charge and conformation |
| I think the rule is that you cannot conform from simple support to melee support for free, but otherwise you can conform if in contact. But I might be surprised. |
Sujet: Charge and conformation |
Neep
Réponses: 13
Vus: 697
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Sam Fév 07, 2026 2:03 pm Sujet: Charge and conformation |
I found the original discussion, here: https://www.artdelaguerre.fr/adlg/v3/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9085
It makes total sense; we just didn't remember it.
If a unit starts a turn both in front corne ... |
Sujet: Stakes and conformation |
Neep
Réponses: 4
Vus: 226
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Ven Fév 06, 2026 2:07 pm Sujet: Stakes and conformation |
| The second bullet on page 20 seems pretty unambiguous. |
Sujet: Website maintenance |
Neep
Réponses: 0
Vus: 147
|
Forum: Discussion générale Posté le: Mer Fév 04, 2026 7:01 pm Sujet: Website maintenance |
| The search function does not appear to be returning posts beyond a year or two back. I assume this is because the DB needs re-indexing of some sort. This gravely inhibits accessing answers to old ques ... |
Sujet: Incomplete conformation and disengage |
Neep
Réponses: 11
Vus: 790
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mer Fév 04, 2026 2:35 pm Sujet: Incomplete conformation and disengage |
I'm not really understanding the concerns.
"As soon as possible" seems pretty clear. I suppose you might encounter a weird "shuffle puzzle" situation where a simpler and more comp ... |
Sujet: Charge and conformation |
Neep
Réponses: 13
Vus: 697
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mar Fév 03, 2026 1:22 am Sujet: Charge and conformation |
| Steve, interesting idea and I can't say you are wrong. But as I see it, only bladed WWg are specified as having to pay 1 CP to optionally conform (in the errata). Artillery in non-melee non-support co ... |
Sujet: Charge and conformation |
Neep
Réponses: 13
Vus: 697
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Lun Fév 02, 2026 3:48 pm Sujet: Charge and conformation |
| I recall an extensive discussion of this. I believe the outcome was that during a charge, you must prefer conforming into melee, i.e. B would conform to unit 2. However if this situation arises due to ... |
Sujet: Incomplete conformation and disengage |
Neep
Réponses: 11
Vus: 790
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Lun Fév 02, 2026 3:35 pm Sujet: Incomplete conformation and disengage |
| I don't see any prohibition on conforming and then disengaging(?) I suppose the new position might prevent a disengagement, though. |
Sujet: Disengage and Multiple Attacks |
Neep
Réponses: 18
Vus: 1204
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Lun Fév 02, 2026 5:34 am Sujet: Disengage and Multiple Attacks |
| I believe the disengagement group question was asked previously and the answer seemed to be any well-formed group could move back, regardless of combat state. |
Sujet: Interpenetration and supporting question |
Neep
Réponses: 4
Vus: 292
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Mar Déc 16, 2025 4:32 am Sujet: Interpenetration and supporting question |
I believe the argument is not that 3 is not in support, but rather that 2 is, and because it is not necessary for it to stay there, it may move on. Then 3 is in support position and so in support.
I ... |
Sujet: Interpenetration and supporting question |
Neep
Réponses: 4
Vus: 292
|
Forum: Rules question V4 Posté le: Dim Déc 14, 2025 1:20 am Sujet: Interpenetration and supporting question |
| Last time this was discussed, there seemed to be a consensus that this was allowed in V3 and would still be allowed. |
Sujet: Attaque multiple |
Neep
Réponses: 13
Vus: 39128
|
Forum: Question sur la règle V4 Posté le: Jeu Déc 11, 2025 4:09 pm Sujet: Attaque multiple |
At least with the English rules, page 60 asserts only the main unit is "in melee" and therefore a unit in melee support will turn to flank/rear because it is not "in melee".
... |
Sujet: Attaque multiple |
Neep
Réponses: 13
Vus: 39128
|
Forum: Question sur la règle V4 Posté le: Jeu Déc 11, 2025 12:13 am Sujet: Attaque multiple |
Et après, B sera obligé de se conformer à son assaillant, donc il ne prendra plus X de flanc.
Non. En soutien de mêlée, B est considéré comme au combat sur son front et donc ne se conforme pa ... |
| |