Mark G Fry
Signifer
Inscrit le: 15 Juin 2017
Messages: 325
Localisation: Bristol, UK
|
 Posté le: Lun Fév 12, 2024 10:56 am Sujet du message: |
 |
[quote="Hazelbark"] | Mark G Fry a écrit: |
It looks like you are taking the BO case (and past editions or other rules) and then trying to bring that situation elsewhere. That is not the requirement. A long evolution towards simplicity. |
Not really Dan - it just didn't seem to be clear to me (thanks for the clarification) and the Burgundian Ordonnance variant just 'muddied' the waters.
But that ruling is clear and helpful - we are looking at a 1:1 swap.
So the Mittani (for example) could have up to 6 mixed units* using either 6 MF swd units or 6 Bowmen units, or a mix of both.
* I'll move the debate about the Mittani list to an Army List thread, as for an army that was primarily (& apparently, in some cases regularly and exclusively) armoured noble chariots, it seems to have a large number of infantry 
Thanks
Mark |
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014
Messages: 1537
|
| Posté le: Lun Fév 12, 2024 3:30 pm Sujet du message: |
|
| Mark G Fry a écrit: |
So the Mittani (for example) could have up to 6 mixed units* using either 6 MF swd units or 6 Bowmen units, or a mix of both.
|
Yes |
|
FAQ
Rechercher
Liste des Membres
Groupes d'utilisateurs
S'enregistrer
Profil
Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés
Connexion
