Art De La Guerre
Bienvenue sur le forum de discussion de la règle de jeu l'Art De La Guerre
 
FAQFAQ RechercherRechercher Liste des MembresListe des Membres Groupes d'utilisateursGroupes d'utilisateurs S'enregistrerS'enregistrer
ProfilProfil Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés ConnexionConnexion
Conformation in contact
Page 1 sur 3 Aller à la page 1, 2, 3  Suivante
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules question V4
Auteur Message
Andy Fyfe
Auxiliaire


Inscrit le: 14 Fév 2024
Messages: 80
MessagePosté le: Mar Aoû 20, 2024 9:39 am    Sujet du message: Conformation in contact Répondre en citant
Hi Guys,

Consider the following:



Unit B destroyed its opponent in melee in red's turn.

Units A and B did not pursue.

It is now blue's turn.

How does unit 1 conform (does it have to)?

I had previously thought that it had to conform to unit A and end up with unit B on its flank dropping it to zero combat factor.

However, the errata has the following entry which I think means that unit 1 does not conform and can stay where it is:

Conformation of units already in contact (page 51)
When a unit must conform to enemy A but is also in the ZOC of another enemy B, it must respect the ZOC of B as a priority and is therefore no longer required to conform to A or make a move to break contact with A. It may remain in contact with enemy A without moving.


Thoughts?
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Neep
Prétorien


Inscrit le: 09 Jan 2023
Messages: 298
MessagePosté le: Mar Aoû 20, 2024 2:26 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
It is not in B's ZoC.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Three
Prétorien


Inscrit le: 20 Déc 2017
Messages: 204
MessagePosté le: Mar Aoû 20, 2024 2:34 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
In the diagram 1 isn't in B's ZoC.

However, 1 must conform to the front of A, but as soon as it does, it then enters B's ZoC.
Unless 1 can slide to it's right and conform against the flank of A, which I don't think it can, it's only option is to remain in place.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Neep
Prétorien


Inscrit le: 09 Jan 2023
Messages: 298
MessagePosté le: Mar Aoû 20, 2024 3:31 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
While I think it's a mistake to chart out conformation as a move - if it fits it conforms - if you want to do it that way then the instance it swings towards A, it is in the ZoC's of both A and B, both are directly in front, and A is closer, so A is the MTE and we ignore B's ZoC.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Three
Prétorien


Inscrit le: 20 Déc 2017
Messages: 204
MessagePosté le: Mar Aoû 20, 2024 3:58 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Yet in the amendment quoted above, it is the ZoC of B that takes priority.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Neep
Prétorien


Inscrit le: 09 Jan 2023
Messages: 298
MessagePosté le: Mar Aoû 20, 2024 4:45 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Because A is the MTE, B's ZoC is ignored. The amendment addresses the case where 1 is not in A's ZoC but is in B's.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Mark G Fry
Légat


Inscrit le: 15 Juin 2017
Messages: 570
Localisation: Bristol, UK
MessagePosté le: Mar Aoû 20, 2024 6:44 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
It appears to me that neither of units A or B have unit 1 in their ZoCs, as P35 states it must be 'directly in front of an enemy and less than one UD from the enemy front edge'. And unit 1 is neither of these. Therefore - A is not the MTE and B's ZoC exerts no influence over unit 1.

However, unit 1 cannot conform to the flank of unit A, as it does not start behind unit A's flank, and unit 1 does not have to enter a position where it is immediately flanked by unit B (or A) if it conforms into the front of unit A (or charges B). As there is a special exemption in this circumstance - not that I can find the page reference at present.

So, I think the situation remains static, until either A voluntarily attacks (or conforms itself) frontally with a wheel to unit 1s front edge, or B moves/charges forward hitting unit 1 frontally.

Just my thoughts
Cheers
Mark
_________________
'He could have lived a risk-free, moneyed life, but he preferred to whittle away his fortune on warfare.' Xenophon, The Anabasis


Dernière édition par Mark G Fry le Mar Aoû 20, 2024 8:40 pm; édité 2 fois
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Zoltan
Légat


Inscrit le: 18 Jan 2015
Messages: 500
Localisation: Wellington, New Zealand
MessagePosté le: Mar Aoû 20, 2024 6:51 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
The p.51 rules for conforming units already in contact have the qualifier, "...if at all possible...". This indicates that in some cases it won't be possible to "resolve all such situations". This is reinforced by the errata which gives an explicit example of an "unresolved conformation". I think the OP is another example of an unresolved conformation - nothing happens.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Andy Fyfe
Auxiliaire


Inscrit le: 14 Fév 2024
Messages: 80
MessagePosté le: Mer Aoû 21, 2024 11:34 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Mark G Fry a écrit:


and unit 1 does not have to enter a position where it is immediately flanked by unit B (or A) if it conforms into the front of unit A (or charges B).



Hi Mark,

I don't think there is any rule saying that you do not have to conform if you will end up with a unit on your flank. It is a reason for not carrying out an uncontrolled charge.

Andy
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Hazelbark
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014
Messages: 1669
MessagePosté le: Mer Aoû 21, 2024 12:20 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Zoltan a écrit:
The p.51 rules for conforming units already in contact have the qualifier, "...if at all possible...". This indicates that in some cases it won't be possible to "resolve all such situations". This is reinforced by the errata which gives an explicit example of an "unresolved conformation". I think the OP is another example of an unresolved conformation - nothing happens.


correct
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
KevinD
Légat


Inscrit le: 23 Aoû 2021
Messages: 645
Localisation: Texas
MessagePosté le: Mer Aoû 21, 2024 4:39 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
It seems to me the answer depends on how you move into the conforming step. If you advance 40mm and then pivot right it is not allowed as B becomes the MTE and you can’t ignore his ZOC to conform to A. If however you turn 90 degrees to the right first and then slide you can do it as A is the MTE after you turn and start sliding.

The rules are silent on how you actually carry out this type of conform - they lay out the proceed on confirm after a charge ( p. 50, “ first sliding and then by pivotingâ€) but not for “Conforming units already in contact†(p 51).
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Mark G Fry
Légat


Inscrit le: 15 Juin 2017
Messages: 570
Localisation: Bristol, UK
MessagePosté le: Mer Aoû 21, 2024 7:12 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Andy Fyfe a écrit:
Mark G Fry a écrit:


and unit 1 does not have to enter a position where it is immediately flanked by unit B (or A) if it conforms into the front of unit A (or charges B).



Hi Mark,

I don't think there is any rule saying that you do not have to conform if you will end up with a unit on your flank. It is a reason for not carrying out an uncontrolled charge.

Andy


You are correct Andy - it is all about uncontrolled charges - but see below:

There is a rule that states that you cannot conform onto a flank if you do not start behind that units flank.
So unit 1 is then forced to try and conform to the front of A, which it cannot do for a couple of reasons:

1) it's rear corner will have to pass through a friendly unit (2) but as 2 is already in melee, that is prohibited

2) In addition, as others have already stated - P51 2nd column, 1st bullet - ZoCs and restrictions on contact with enemy (so not being able to conform to the flank of A) must be respected and take precedence over obligation to conform' ... so the moment unit 1 tries to conform to the front of unit A, it is stopped by entering the ZoC of unit B. This is exactly the same process by which a player might use Unit B's ZoC to prevent a charge on Unit A.

NB: The example I was looking for is actually applicable to units subject to an uncontrolled charge:
p46 Exceptions to Uncontrolled Charge - 2nd column, 2nd bullet point - 'If, as a result of its charge, the unit would find itself with an enemy in contact on its flank or rear'.

Now admittedly that is for an uncontrolled charge, but conforming is also an uncontrolled action.
And the above rule seems, sensibly, to be designed to prevent players exploiting a particular situation, (& as the example can be set up deliberately - there is a thread on this very forum discussing this fact, where my opponent at the 2023 'Campaign' competition legally & successfully moved his equivalent of Unit A(a unit of Bowmen) into the same position as Unit A in the diagram (but just so our corners were not touching) - to block my unit 1 (an impetuous Heavy Knight unit) preventing it from charging either Unit B to its front (another unit of Bowmen) or Unit A to its flank, without being disadvantaged by losing impact.

So maybe we need a (new) section in the rules that covers all the Exceptions to Conforming - like entering disadvantaging terrain etc. for example.

But I still dont think that Unit 1 has to conform to the front of Unit A or Unit B Very Happy
_________________
'He could have lived a risk-free, moneyed life, but he preferred to whittle away his fortune on warfare.' Xenophon, The Anabasis
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
SteveR
Signifer


Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2018
Messages: 369
MessagePosté le: Jeu Aoû 22, 2024 1:59 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Hi Mark,

Your first point is that the unit in melee may not be wheeled through, but this is not correct. It may not be interpenetrated but that is not what is happening here. Look at page 31 last bullet under wheeling. It is being temporarily overlapped.

I think that Unit 1 must conform. It wheels to do so, as it is already in corner to corner contact. When it does it enters the ZOC of both B and A at the same time. At that point it checks to see which enemy is the MTE. As A is the closest straight ahead it is A. So it then ignores the ZOC of B and completes the conformation with A.

This is a question that came up recently on facebook and I answered it incorrectly at first, later coming to the understanding above. But I may be wrong again of course
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Neep
Prétorien


Inscrit le: 09 Jan 2023
Messages: 298
MessagePosté le: Jeu Aoû 22, 2024 3:02 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Keep in mind you could always pay to move away, or even charge B if that was preferable.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Mark G Fry
Légat


Inscrit le: 15 Juin 2017
Messages: 570
Localisation: Bristol, UK
MessagePosté le: Jeu Aoû 22, 2024 8:29 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
SteveR a écrit:
Hi Mark,

Your first point is that the unit in melee may not be wheeled through, but this is not correct. It may not be interpenetrated but that is not what is happening here. Look at page 31 last bullet under wheeling. It is being temporarily overlapped.

I think that Unit 1 must conform. It wheels to do so, as it is already in corner to corner contact. When it does it enters the ZOC of both B and A at the same time. At that point it checks to see which enemy is the MTE. As A is the closest straight ahead it is A. So it then ignores the ZOC of B and completes the conformation with A.

This is a question that came up recently on facebook and I answered it incorrectly at first, later coming to the understanding above. But I may be wrong again of course


You are correct re the 'temporarily overlapped' aspect - good spot. I missed that.

So, in effect what you are saying Steve is that here we have a situation where a unit (Unit 1) is forced to effectively make a move (conform to A) that not only will significantly disadvantage it, but might also potentially destroy it instantly, if it already has enough existing hits on it before conforming.

I'm thinking that this is one of those cases which is a bit like conforming into terrain that will disadvantage the unit, and it should be optional.
But I am inclining towards the fact that Unit 1 is going to end up complying to the front edge of Unit A and in so doing is being flanked by B and will receive a (another) casualty.
Crazy stuff Shocked
_________________
'He could have lived a risk-free, moneyed life, but he preferred to whittle away his fortune on warfare.' Xenophon, The Anabasis
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
  
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules question V4
Page 1 sur 3 Aller à la page 1, 2, 3  Suivante
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet Toutes les heures sont au format GMT

 
Sauter vers:  
Vous ne pouvez pas poster de nouveaux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas éditer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas supprimer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas voter dans les sondages de ce forum