Art De La Guerre
Bienvenue sur le forum de discussion de la règle de jeu l'Art De La Guerre
 
FAQFAQ RechercherRechercher Liste des MembresListe des Membres Groupes d'utilisateursGroupes d'utilisateurs S'enregistrerS'enregistrer
ProfilProfil Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés ConnexionConnexion
Conforming to flank
Page 1 sur 1
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules question V4
Auteur Message
Za Otlichiye
Signifer


Inscrit le: 07 Sep 2021
Messages: 341
Localisation: Lovecraft country (and you Dan?)
MessagePosté le: Ven Oct 22, 2021 10:52 pm    Sujet du message: Conforming to flank Répondre en citant
This is a really basic question that doesn't seem to be addressed. Maybe I'm remembering too much DBxxx...

Two units attack an enemy, one in simple support immediately adjacent to the main unit. Completely vanilla.

Melee does not get resolved and attacker has another turn. Can the supporting unit now wheel into the flank of the defender?
Or must they slide forward this turn and wheel the next?

***

BTW in case anyone is taking notes, the Type of Contact on page 41 is technically incorrect. A unit exactly on the the line extending the front of an enemy unit can neither attack the enemy's front nor flank edges! Shocked
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
AlanCutner
Tribun


Inscrit le: 03 Nov 2014
Messages: 716
Localisation: Scotland
MessagePosté le: Sam Oct 23, 2021 8:48 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
If the two units attacked as a group then the supporting unit cannot be past the front edge of the defender, so 'no' it cannot move on to the flank. Instead it can move forward on its turn to be in a position to turn flank the move after that.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Dickstick
Légat


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016
Messages: 682
Localisation: West Bromwich
MessagePosté le: Sam Oct 23, 2021 9:33 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Keep up the perseverance in moving away from Dbxxx way of reading things.
Your "exactly on the line" situation is to be found in the front contact definition on p41.
You just need time to find it.
_________________
Player 747 don't call me Jumbo
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Za Otlichiye
Signifer


Inscrit le: 07 Sep 2021
Messages: 341
Localisation: Lovecraft country (and you Dan?)
MessagePosté le: Sam Oct 30, 2021 9:37 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
I'm rather distressed with the lack of response to this question. I vowed not to follow up until 100 views, but here we are. Smile

Let me clearly restate the question:

In EXAMPLE 1 on page 65 can the HI in simple support wheel into the flank of the Ph in their next turn?

Alan kindly replied, "No, they must advance in one turn, and wheel in the next." I have no doubt that that is how he and his group learned, teach, and play the game. But that brings up the next question:

Where is this explained in the rule book?

Since neither he nor anyone else suggested where, I assume his opinion is based on word of mouth.

Dickstick suggested looking at page 41. It certainly seems to be the right place. But what it says is:

Citation:

Type of contact
A unit can contact an enemy's front, flank, or rear edges, with it front edge under the following conditions.

Front contact: A unit can contact the front edge of an enemy if it begins its movement with its front edge either entirely or partially in front of the straight line extending the enemy's front edge.

Flank contact:A unit can contact the flank edge of an enemy if it begins its movement with its front edge either entirely or partially directly¹ behind the straight line extending the front of the enemy unit and provided no part of the attacking unit's front edge is directly in front of the enemy's front or rear edge.

Rear contact:A unit can contact the rear edge of an enemy if it begins its movement with its front edge either entirely or partially behind the straight line extending the enemy's rear edge.

¹ I assume this is a technically absurd misplaced word - the kind of nit we aren't supposed to pick. But if you disagree, please let me know.

I have checked and rechecked this over and over, and the answer always comes out the same. This is a clear, common boundary condition error. It does not cover the case of a unit's front edge on the line extending the enemy's front edge.
That is useless, but if we assume in front of includes on then behind should as well. Which would contradict Alan, but no one else has.

So it leaves me with the awkward question:
Why hasn't anyone spotted and corrected this (in the past 7 years if Dickstick is correct)?

I'd love to hear some more encouraging responses.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
madaxeman
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 01 Nov 2014
Messages: 1476
Localisation: Londres Centraal.
MessagePosté le: Sam Oct 30, 2021 10:09 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
I'm sorry, but I really don't understand what point you are trying to make here. To me, the rules are clear, and they appear to be clear to everyone else also - I really can't see what point you are trying to make.

It would be perhaps useful to know if this passage in the rules is one your regular face to face opponents also have issues with, as if they have not raised it as an issue it may be easier for you to resolve this point to your satisfaction by talking it over with fellow players at your club or FLGS to get their views, rather than debating it with puzzled strangers on an international forum?
_________________
www.madaxeman.com
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé Visiter le site web de l'utilisateur
Dickstick
Légat


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016
Messages: 682
Localisation: West Bromwich
MessagePosté le: Sam Oct 30, 2021 10:10 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
When two enemy units contact and conform to each other frontally they are not mounting each other but in contact on opposite sides of a line.
This is the line considered in the three contact situations you quote.
No one is ever on the line .

Just as in differential maths the hare never catches the tortoise, it is behind then ahead but never along side.

So your simple support is on the same side of the line as the friend in frontal contact, so under the definition of frontal contact the support can only charge frontally.

In simple player term one needs to move first to a position from which you are correctly positioned under flank or rear contact definition to then launch a charge.

The game is about getting behind enemy flanks or keeping enemy to ones front where support is unavailable.
_________________
Player 747 don't call me Jumbo
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Ramses II
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015
Messages: 1160
Localisation: London
MessagePosté le: Sam Oct 30, 2021 11:40 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
madaxeman a écrit:
I'm sorry, but I really don't understand what point you are trying to make here. To me, the rules are clear, and they appear to be clear to everyone else also - I really can't see what point you are trying to make.

It would be perhaps useful to know if this passage in the rules is one your regular face to face opponents also have issues with, as if they have not raised it as an issue it may be easier for you to resolve this point to your satisfaction by talking it over with fellow players at your club or FLGS to get their views, rather than debating it with puzzled strangers on an international forum?
Agreed. What Madaxeman and Dipstick are both saying, perhaps obliquely, is that the rules do cover this. The game has gone through four iterations of the rules since 2008, and the combat definitions and process are well understood.
  • The definitions of front flank and rear are in the diagram on p41.
  • The particular points you raise are covered directly or implicitly in the section "Conforming units already in contact" p51 and the accompanying diagrams.
  • As Dipstick says, 'technically' a line does not in fact exist since it is the shortest distance between two points . . . . So the front edge of the unit is either one side of the line or the other, it cannot actually be 'on' the line. Consequently a unit in Simple Support is actually located entirely "in front" of the enemy. So Alan correctly replied that in the diag on p65, the HI may not wheel forwards to contact the flank of the Pike for two reasons
    1. If it were to start out of contact sideways from the defined location, it would be deemed to start "in front" of the enemy (per p41)
    2. Since it is starting in contact, even by just a corner, it may only conform (not move; see Charge definition p42). Again, since it starts "in front", it can only conform to a position "in front" - because them's the rules.
      (and yes that is something that grizzled ADLG veterans will explain to you in the course of a game)
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
KevinD
Légat


Inscrit le: 23 Aoû 2021
Messages: 501
Localisation: Texas
MessagePosté le: Dim Oct 31, 2021 1:14 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Za Otlichiye a écrit:
I'm rather distressed with the lack of response to this question. I vowed not to follow up until 100 views, but here we are. Smile

Let me clearly restate the question:

In EXAMPLE 1 on page 65 can the HI in simple support wheel into the flank of the Ph in their next turn?

Alan kindly replied, "No, they must advance in one turn, and wheel in the next." I have no doubt that that is how he and his group learned, teach, and play the game. But that brings up the next question:

Where is this explained in the rule book?

Since neither he nor anyone else suggested where, I assume his opinion is based on word of mouth.

Dickstick suggested looking at page 41. It certainly seems to be the right place. But what it says is:

Citation:

Type of contact
A unit can contact an enemy's front, flank, or rear edges, with it front edge under the following conditions.

Front contact: A unit can contact the front edge of an enemy if it begins its movement with its front edge either entirely or partially in front of the straight line extending the enemy's front edge.

Flank contact:A unit can contact the flank edge of an enemy if it begins its movement with its front edge either entirely or partially directly¹ behind the straight line extending the front of the enemy unit and provided no part of the attacking unit's front edge is directly in front of the enemy's front or rear edge.

Rear contact:A unit can contact the rear edge of an enemy if it begins its movement with its front edge either entirely or partially behind the straight line extending the enemy's rear edge.

¹ I assume this is a technically absurd misplaced word - the kind of nit we aren't supposed to pick. But if you disagree, please let me know.

I have checked and rechecked this over and over, and the answer always comes out the same. This is a clear, common boundary condition error. It does not cover the case of a unit's front edge on the line extending the enemy's front edge.
That is useless, but if we assume in front of includes on then behind should as well. Which would contradict Alan, but no one else has.

So it leaves me with the awkward question:
Why hasn't anyone spotted and corrected this (in the past 7 years if Dickstick is correct)?

I'd love to hear some more encouraging responses.


Being on the line extending the target unit’s front is not good enough to flank the target. At least part of your base must be beyond the (that is on the target unit’s side of) the line extending the target unit’s front in order to flank the target unit.

In the diagram on p 41, bottom right, see unit B1. It is on (with its front corner) the line but not beyond it, so it can’t contact the flank.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Za Otlichiye
Signifer


Inscrit le: 07 Sep 2021
Messages: 341
Localisation: Lovecraft country (and you Dan?)
MessagePosté le: Dim Oct 31, 2021 3:38 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
I think what Dickstick is reaching for is, "if the front edge is on the s.l.e.t.e.f.e. then if the rest of the unit is in front you can make front contact, if the rest of the unit is behind, you can make flank contact." Simple and clear.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Za Otlichiye
Signifer


Inscrit le: 07 Sep 2021
Messages: 341
Localisation: Lovecraft country (and you Dan?)
MessagePosté le: Lun Nov 01, 2021 4:37 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Madaxeman your blog and your description of converting your Han is what inspired me to spring for the rulebook. I don't have a grizzled ADLG veteran within an easy 3 hour drive to go consult. The forum is my club and you are my fount of wisdom. What is your point?

***

I stand by my statement, although "pivot" would be more sensible than "wheel". No need to spend the CP if you don't have to.

I went through every diagram in the Melee and Conformance sections. I looked at those on page 41. I read the appropriate section in Conformance and the others as well. The answer is not to be found there.
Which is just as well. If the answer were somewhere else, the rules would be disorganized. Instead it's just a fundamental but easily corrected flaw in the definition.

It is the nature of things that working with four iterations over a decade will make it increasingly difficult to separate what is understood from what is presented. That's why I'm offering my fresh-eyed perspective now, before I get ground down.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Ramses II
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015
Messages: 1160
Localisation: London
MessagePosté le: Mar Nov 02, 2021 12:13 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Ok, realise that these rules are written in French and then translated into English. No ‘Technical writers’ are involved (which seems to be what you are seeking) and consequently they are not perfect. 

That said, we have tried to explain where the points raised are covered by the rules - as defined by the author, and worked out in practice over many years by hundreds of players worldwide.
In this instance please accept the definitions presented and try to use them, rather than arguing for some change that is incorrect.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
  
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules question V4
Page 1 sur 1
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet Toutes les heures sont au format GMT

 
Sauter vers:  
Vous ne pouvez pas poster de nouveaux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas éditer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas supprimer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas voter dans les sondages de ce forum