Auteur |
Message |
Dickstick
Tribun
Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016 Messages: 721
Localisation: West Bromwich
|
Posté le: Sam Juin 19, 2021 10:45 pm Sujet du message: Wheels of change? |
|
My flank command has been screened by light troops so it wheels to face the middle ground.
I pivot my four Hi spear so their outer end goes 2 UD while the two bowmen on the outer end goes 3 UD. Been doing this for years under v3 , so happy to find same rule p31 bullet point 2 . No one exceeded there own max speed.
Am I no longer able to wheel so fast under bullet point 4?
Am I mistaken? _________________ Player 747 don't call me Jumbo |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
SteveR
Signifer
Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2018 Messages: 369
|
Posté le: Dim Juin 20, 2021 4:25 am Sujet du message: |
|
Sorry no you cannot do it.
Page 31 bullet 4 - all units in a group count as having moved the distance of the outermost front corner. So the HI spear count as having moved 3 UD.
I actually think this was not allowed under V3 either...
However remember if the group was more than 4 UD from all enemies of course. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Dickstick
Tribun
Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016 Messages: 721
Localisation: West Bromwich
|
Posté le: Dim Juin 20, 2021 8:25 am Sujet du message: |
|
Also under General rules p29 Bp4 they can!
P29 and 32 bp2 are exactly as v3 had it.
P32 bp4 is the new spanner in the works.
What is the point of writing both variants.?
One should be deleted as they contradict unless anyone can explain why/when they don't. _________________ Player 747 don't call me Jumbo |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
AlanCutner
Tribun
Inscrit le: 03 Nov 2014 Messages: 747
Localisation: Scotland
|
Posté le: Dim Juin 20, 2021 1:31 pm Sujet du message: |
|
I don't see a conflict here. P29 all units in the group can move up to their maximum distance, but (p31) all count as moving the distance of the outermost unit. So a group of Sp with a bw on the end can have the Bw wheel 3UD as long as no Sp moves more than 2UD. The main impact of this is for unmanouverable units - no unit in the group counts as moving less than maximum speed. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
madaxeman
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 01 Nov 2014 Messages: 1599
Localisation: Londres Centraal.
|
Posté le: Dim Juin 20, 2021 1:38 pm Sujet du message: |
|
AlanCutner a écrit: | I don't see a conflict here. P29 all units in the group can move up to their maximum distance, but (p31) all count as moving the distance of the outermost unit. So a group of Sp with a bw on the end can have the Bw wheel 3UD as long as no Sp moves more than 2UD. The main impact of this is for unmanouverable units - no unit in the group counts as moving less than maximum speed. |
Yep... agreed. The magic words I suspect are "count as" in that bullet point.
As long as no units exceeds it's normal movement distance in the real world on the real tabletop, you can wheel exactly as before. OK, you'll "count as" moving the same distance as the outside one, but you won't actually have exceeded your movement allowance.
The only thing that this then impacts is - as Alan says - unmaneuverable units all moving full speed.
Clever wording  _________________ www.madaxeman.com |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Dickstick
Tribun
Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016 Messages: 721
Localisation: West Bromwich
|
Posté le: Dim Juin 20, 2021 1:39 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Alan
Does the spear not cout as moving 3 UD because the bow did? _________________ Player 747 don't call me Jumbo |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
AlanCutner
Tribun
Inscrit le: 03 Nov 2014 Messages: 747
Localisation: Scotland
|
Posté le: Dim Juin 20, 2021 1:53 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Citation: | Does the spear not cost as moving 3 UD because the bow did? |
It 'counts' as moving 3UD, but does not actually move 3UD. Pretty much as Tim said. A game mechanism. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Dickstick
Tribun
Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016 Messages: 721
Localisation: West Bromwich
|
Posté le: Dim Juin 20, 2021 3:19 pm Sujet du message: |
|
So are we happy to ignore bp4 because it adds nothing to the rules? _________________ Player 747 don't call me Jumbo |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
AlanCutner
Tribun
Inscrit le: 03 Nov 2014 Messages: 747
Localisation: Scotland
|
Posté le: Dim Juin 20, 2021 5:57 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Not quite. P31 bullet 4 is very important for unmanouverable troops. Means a wheel is just 1CP rather than 2CP if the outermost point moves at full speed. But probably not much effect otherwise. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Dickstick
Tribun
Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2016 Messages: 721
Localisation: West Bromwich
|
Posté le: Dim Juin 20, 2021 6:13 pm Sujet du message: |
|
That was okay under v3 so still puzzled as to why the additional BP _________________ Player 747 don't call me Jumbo |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
vexillia
Centurion

Inscrit le: 21 Nov 2017 Messages: 408
Localisation: Nantwich, UK
|
Posté le: Lun Juin 21, 2021 9:33 am Sujet du message: |
|
Dickstick a écrit: | I pivot my four Hi spear so their outer end goes 2 UD while the two bowmen on the outer end goes 3 UD. |
This set me thinking (one of the delights of being retired). Is this geometrically correct and are there other cases? The answers are yes and no (ish) respectively. Here's the maths:
I couldn't find another case (for six wide) where a full move by the HI (c) resulted in an outside move (d) divisible by 4 cm so this looks like a special case. It will of course work for three wide (2HI + 1Bw).
Great fun! I haven't done real trigonometry for decades. _________________ Martin Stephenson
Subscribe via email or rss. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
vexillia
Centurion

Inscrit le: 21 Nov 2017 Messages: 408
Localisation: Nantwich, UK
|
Posté le: Lun Juin 21, 2021 4:05 pm Sujet du message: |
|
vexillia a écrit: | I couldn't find another case (for six wide) where a full move by the HI (c) resulted in an outside move (d) divisible by 4 cm so this looks like a special case. |
I was wrong! A combination of 3HI & 3Cv also allows the outside unit to move full after the HI have moved 8 cm. There are other combinations too. _________________ Martin Stephenson
Subscribe via email or rss. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Longtooth
Signifer
Inscrit le: 14 Oct 2014 Messages: 357
Localisation: Oxford
|
Posté le: Lun Juin 21, 2021 6:46 pm Sujet du message: |
|
......except that HI and Cav cannot form a group  |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
vexillia
Centurion

Inscrit le: 21 Nov 2017 Messages: 408
Localisation: Nantwich, UK
|
Posté le: Lun Juin 21, 2021 6:52 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Longtooth a écrit: | ......except that HI and Cav cannot form a group  |
And that's the trouble with trigonometry.  _________________ Martin Stephenson
Subscribe via email or rss. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
vexillia
Centurion

Inscrit le: 21 Nov 2017 Messages: 408
Localisation: Nantwich, UK
|
Posté le: Mar Juin 22, 2021 8:45 am Sujet du message: |
|
Back on topic. Consider the reverse situation to the OP:
- A line on 4Kn with 1 Cv or LH on the right making a 5 wide group.
- The group wheels to the left.
- To ensure the right most Kn moves exactly 3 UD the Cv (or LH) must move 3.8 UD
- End result: the rightmost Kn has moved full (3 UD) but the Cv (or LH) have not.
So using the "Madaxeman interpretation" above:
- All the Kn "counts as" moving 3.8 UD.
- This doesn't matter as, on the table, none of the Kn exceeded their 3 UD move distance.
- The Kn "counts as" moving their full move (3.8 > 3.0 UD).
- As a consequence the Kn do not suffer any penalties for moving short.
Have I got this right or do I have to invoke the Liverpool Variation? _________________ Martin Stephenson
Subscribe via email or rss.
Dernière édition par vexillia le Mar Juin 22, 2021 9:03 am; édité 2 fois |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
|