Art De La Guerre
Bienvenue sur le forum de discussion de la règle de jeu l'Art De La Guerre
 
FAQFAQ RechercherRechercher Liste des MembresListe des Membres Groupes d'utilisateursGroupes d'utilisateurs S'enregistrerS'enregistrer
ProfilProfil Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés ConnexionConnexion
Conform after combat
Page 1 sur 1
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules question V4
Auteur Message
AlanCutner
Tribun


Inscrit le: 03 Nov 2014
Messages: 711
Localisation: Scotland
MessagePosté le: Mer Déc 15, 2021 1:48 pm    Sujet du message: Conform after combat Répondre en citant
A club mate asked me my opinion on conformation after he'd been told of a ruling at Ascot (I wasn't there).

Situation below where ABCD are in combat with 1234.
ABCD
_123

Unit B is destroyed in its own turn (so unit 1 cannot pursue) leaving
A_CD
_123

My club mate was told unit 1 would have to conform to unit A unless it moved away from the combat in some other way. My opinion is that this is wrong. P51 (Conforming units already in contact) seems to be the section requiring such a conformation, but only applies to units not in melee or already in a position to provide support. It is providing support to unit 2 so does not have to move away, even to fight unit A.

Which is correct?
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Snowhitsky
Prétorien


Inscrit le: 15 Juin 2015
Messages: 224
Localisation: Lancaster, UK
MessagePosté le: Mer Déc 15, 2021 2:06 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
1 is already in melee as a support. It does not need to conform.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Hazelbark
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014
Messages: 1544
MessagePosté le: Mer Déc 15, 2021 3:49 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Snowhitsky a écrit:
1 is already in melee as a support. It does not need to conform.


Exactly.

This is supported clearly in the rules
p 51 first sentence under "Conforming units already in contact"
This is clearly a support position.

further
p 53 first bullet


So multiple ways this is clear.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
AlanCutner
Tribun


Inscrit le: 03 Nov 2014
Messages: 711
Localisation: Scotland
MessagePosté le: Mer Déc 15, 2021 4:56 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Thanks both. I thought it pretty clear, but was wondering when told of the Ascot ruling.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Ramses II
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015
Messages: 1160
Localisation: London
MessagePosté le: Mer Déc 15, 2021 6:15 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Umm, I think the situation is slightly confused by earlier discussions and DT rulings, which could be the cause of the recent ruling at Ascot.

There was a similar discussion in 2019 Here :-
http://www.artdelaguerre.fr/adlg/v3/forum/viewtopic.php?p=98494#98494

Using the current diagram to describe that ruling from the DT, Unit 1 was advancing into contact while units 2 & 3 were already in melee. In that particular case it was ruled that Unit 1 would have to conform on A, rather than being allowed to choose to remain in support of unit 2.
The rules have not changed between V3 and V4 regarding conforming in this particular situation, while the major difference here is that Unit 1 is already effectively in melee with enemy unit C.

This is obviously confusing at best.
I will check with the DT.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Za Otlichiye
Signifer


Inscrit le: 07 Sep 2021
Messages: 341
Localisation: Lovecraft country (and you Dan?)
MessagePosté le: Mer Déc 15, 2021 10:34 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
May it conform?

Page 50 bullet 1 seems to say it "Can", but page 51 Conforming units already in contact seems to exclude it.

---

Why would it ever want to? Consider if unit A is in flank to flank contact...
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Ramses II
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015
Messages: 1160
Localisation: London
MessagePosté le: Ven Déc 17, 2021 2:46 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
OK, so I checked with the oracle, and this is the official response.
Please note, this may wall not be how people have played in the past, so please check against the rules.

Conformation is treated differently depending on whether this occurs after charging, after moving into support, or when in contact after a melee; and there are separate sections of rules to cover the three cases. Furthermore, Charging is deemed to take precedence over moving into support.

Question #1 Conformation units already in contact
    In the original case on this thread, units A-D charged units 1-3 but unit B was destroyed leaving the situation
    A_CD
    _123

    Now it is the turn of units 1-3; does unit 1 have to conform on A ??

    Answer
    No. (see the definition of Conformation units already in contact P51)
    Unit 1 is in support of unit 2 while not being in melee with any enemy, so it is not forced to conform on A, but may do so if the player chooses to do so.


Question #2 Conformation after a charge
    Suppose units CD are already in melee with 23, while unit 1 was in range to provide support like this
    A_CD
    __34
    _1

    In the turn 1-3, Unit 1 moves to provide simple support to unit 2, ending up in corner-to-contact with enemy units A and C as in the original diagram above. What happens here ?

    Answer
    When unit 1 moves into into contact with Unit A, it MUST conform with unit A using the rules on P50, as charging is deemed to take precedence over providing support. This was determined in the previous post.


Note
A unit is deemed to be moving to provide support if it is not already in contact with the enemy unit and that enemy unit is not already in melee. In this case it conforms according to the section "Conformation to give support" on P51.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
vexillia
Signifer


Inscrit le: 21 Nov 2017
Messages: 352
Localisation: Warrington, UK
MessagePosté le: Ven Déc 17, 2021 10:05 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Ramses II a écrit:
OK, so I checked with the oracle, and this is the official response.
Please note, this may wall not be how people have played in the past, so please check against the rules.

Conformation is treated differently depending on whether this occurs after charging, after moving into support, or when in contact after a melee; and there are separate sections of rules to cover the three cases. Furthermore, Charging is deemed to take precedence over moving into support.

Question #1 Conformation units already in contact

Question #2 Conformation after a charge


You've covered 2 of the three situations. Thank you. What happens with the situation in Q2 when "moving into support" and not charging?

Finally, will this be added to the FAQs?
_________________
Martin Stephenson
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé Visiter le site web de l'utilisateur
Ramses II
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015
Messages: 1160
Localisation: London
MessagePosté le: Ven Déc 17, 2021 12:26 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
vexillia a écrit:
You've covered 2 of the three situations. Thank you. What happens with the situation in Q2 when "moving into support" and not charging?

Finally, will this be added to the FAQs?
The whole point of question #2 is that it is not possible to “move into support†where the unit also contacts another enemy that is not in melee - the unit is deemed to be “charging†that other unit.
Unit 1 can only move to a position in simple support of unit 2 if unit A is absent or located elsewhere.

At the moment there is no FAQ document, only errata  correcting the V4 version, and this situation is covered by the rules, though I agree it could be open to ‘personal interpretation’.  
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
vexillia
Signifer


Inscrit le: 21 Nov 2017
Messages: 352
Localisation: Warrington, UK
MessagePosté le: Ven Déc 17, 2021 3:54 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Ramses II a écrit:
The whole point of question #2 is that it is not possible to “move into support†where the unit also contacts another enemy that is not in melee - the unit is deemed to be “charging†that other unit.


OK. Thanks.

Ramses II a écrit:
At the moment there is no FAQ document, only errata  correcting the V4 version, and this situation is covered by the rules, though I agree it could be open to ‘personal interpretation’.


No problem but isn't that the point of FAQs?
_________________
Martin Stephenson
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé Visiter le site web de l'utilisateur
vexillia
Signifer


Inscrit le: 21 Nov 2017
Messages: 352
Localisation: Warrington, UK
MessagePosté le: Sam Déc 18, 2021 8:55 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Having thought about this a bit more:

Ramses II a écrit:
The whole point of question #2 is that it is not possible to “move into support†where the unit also contacts another enemy that is not in melee - the unit is deemed to be “charging†that other unit.


Am I right in assuming that the moving player cannot simply "move to support" but must declare a charge (and charge direction) if the unit not in melee has the option to evade? I ask because this would then require variable move dice rolling with the possibility that the charging unit may roll short and not reach a support position.
_________________
Martin Stephenson
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé Visiter le site web de l'utilisateur
Ramses II
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015
Messages: 1160
Localisation: London
MessagePosté le: Sam Déc 18, 2021 1:10 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
In essence, yes. 

Given  the earlier diagrams, if unit 1 will contact enemy A and C simultaneously, and thus will be deemed to be charging and conforming on unit A, then the whole charge / evade process takes place.

This may result in A evading, allowing unit 1 to conform into support of its friends, or unit 1 may roll short and be unable to reach. 

Equaly, because it is a charge move, it will prevent unit 1 from using normal movement to arrive at the desired position because charge moves are straight after any initial direction change. 
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
vexillia
Signifer


Inscrit le: 21 Nov 2017
Messages: 352
Localisation: Warrington, UK
MessagePosté le: Sam Déc 18, 2021 5:28 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Thanks. This is definitely a tricky one worthy of an FAQ.
_________________
Martin Stephenson
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé Visiter le site web de l'utilisateur
KevinD
Légat


Inscrit le: 23 Aoû 2021
Messages: 501
Localisation: Texas
MessagePosté le: Sam Déc 18, 2021 6:21 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
What if 123 charge A_CD?

A_CD
_123

What happens?

(Does 1 remain in support of C or conform to fight A? Does it matter if the A_C gap is exactly 1 UD or < 1 UD?)

Does it matter if 123 already did a 1 UD shirt to the left before they charged (so if 1 conforms on A it will be shifting 2 UD left in total)?

Does it matter if before the charge the distance between the nearest points of A and 1 > 1’s charge distance? (If for example before the slide to the left, CD was exactly at the charge range of 1 and thus (by the Pythagorean theorem) A starts beyond 1’s charge distance.)
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Ramses II
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015
Messages: 1160
Localisation: London
MessagePosté le: Sam Déc 18, 2021 9:47 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Since units 1-3 are charging into contact, they follow the rules for Conformation after a Charge.

Case #1
    If units 1-3 are parallel with A-D, unit 1 must conform on A if it makes contact during the charge irrespective of the gap between units A and C, or the initial movement of the group.
    The same will be true if unit 1 is forced to conform into contact with Unit A by units 23 conforming onto units CD. This will represent the extreme case of conformation since it will cause unit 1 to slide up to 1.5UD (0.5UD caused by units 23 sliding left, and then 1UD required because unit 1 would then be in contact with unit A).


Case #2
    If units 1-3 are angled such that unit 2 contacts D, this is covered by P50 top diagram, where the units will slide right, since unit 2 will be the first unit entered the ZoC of D. Thus looking like this :-

    A_CD
    __123


Case #3
    If units 1-3 are angled such that unit 3 contacts D but unit 1 cannot reach A, then the conformation will follow p50 bottom diagram, with units 23 conforming on units CD, while unit 1 stops short of A looking like this.

    A_CD
    __23
    _1
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
  
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules question V4
Page 1 sur 1
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet Toutes les heures sont au format GMT

 
Sauter vers:  
Vous ne pouvez pas poster de nouveaux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas éditer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas supprimer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas voter dans les sondages de ce forum