Art De La Guerre
Bienvenue sur le forum de discussion de la règle de jeu l'Art De La Guerre
 
FAQFAQ RechercherRechercher Liste des MembresListe des Membres Groupes d'utilisateursGroupes d'utilisateurs S'enregistrerS'enregistrer
ProfilProfil Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés ConnexionConnexion
Discovering an ambush
Page 1 sur 2 Aller à la page 1, 2  Suivante
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules question V4
Auteur Message
Andy Fyfe
Auxiliaire


Inscrit le: 14 Fév 2024
Messages: 80
MessagePosté le: Ven Mai 31, 2024 11:31 am    Sujet du message: Discovering an ambush Répondre en citant
Hi Guys,

On page 77 it states that an ambush is automatically revealed if an enemy unit approaches within one UD of the marker.

The rest of the rules are specific about the phrase 'within one UD' as meaning 'less than one UD' (for example in the ZoC definition).

So, does the discovering unit:

1. Stop at exactly 1 UD?
2. Stop at less than 1 UD (all the way to almost touching)?

This will obviously affect ZoC and placing other units if there are more than one element in the ambush.

I know you can interrupt movement to voluntarily place an ambush when the enemy gets within 4 UD but not for an unreliable / untested corp.

What are your thoughts?
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Andy Fyfe
Auxiliaire


Inscrit le: 14 Fév 2024
Messages: 80
MessagePosté le: Ven Mai 31, 2024 11:50 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
I think that it should read - "..enemy units gets to one UD..".

The unit then stops at exactly one UD and the ambush is revealed and placed or is a fake.

If fake the discovering unit can continue moving.

This means that:

- No unit is in ZoC
- Units are in shooting range
- No issues with deploying the rest of the elements in the ambush
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Zoltan
Légat


Inscrit le: 18 Jan 2015
Messages: 500
Localisation: Wellington, New Zealand
MessagePosté le: Ven Mai 31, 2024 2:48 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
The rules mean exactly what they say - as soon as an enemy unit comes within (less than) 1 UD the ambush is revealed.

Whether or not ZoCs apply will depend on the units and terrain involved.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Neep
Prétorien


Inscrit le: 09 Jan 2023
Messages: 298
MessagePosté le: Ven Mai 31, 2024 4:38 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
While I think AdlG has issues with clarity, this certainly isn't one of them.

The definition of ZoC on page 35 never uses the term "within" and takes pains to explain that at exactly 1UD, you are not in the ZoC.

"Within [an area or distance]" has a fixed definition in English, "not more than". So, yes, you get 1UD from the ambush marker and it is revealed.
This means you can put everyone in your ZoC when you resume moving after deployment of the ambush.
You are in shooting range just as you would be if you were inside of 1UD.
You will restrict ambush deployment if you approach at an angle.


Dernière édition par Neep le Sam Juin 01, 2024 4:57 pm; édité 1 fois
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Andy Fyfe
Auxiliaire


Inscrit le: 14 Fév 2024
Messages: 80
MessagePosté le: Ven Mai 31, 2024 4:47 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Neep a écrit:
While I think AdlG has issues with clarity, this certainly isn't one of them.

The definition of ZoC on page 35 never uses the term "within" and takes pains to explain that at exactly 1UD, you are not in the ZoC.

"Within" has a fixed definition in English, "not more than". So, yes, you get 1UD from the ambush marker and it is revealed.
This means you can put everyone in your ZoC when you resume moving after deployment of the ambush.
You are in shooting range just as you would be if you were inside of 1UD.
You will restrict ambush deployment if you approach at an angle.


So two different answers then.

Also - where does it say you can continue moving after the ambush is revealed to contain units?

The rules state you can continue moving if it is a fake ambush marker only.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Neep
Prétorien


Inscrit le: 09 Jan 2023
Messages: 298
MessagePosté le: Ven Mai 31, 2024 5:12 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
It has been stated by a member of the rules committee that per the author, the line of page 77, " The enemy unit can continue its move but cannot charge the units that were in ambush" should apply to discovered ambushes as well as voluntarily revealed ambushes. ZoC restrictions would apply, of course.

Dernière édition par Neep le Ven Mai 31, 2024 10:55 pm; édité 2 fois
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Hazelbark
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014
Messages: 1669
MessagePosté le: Ven Mai 31, 2024 6:52 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Neep a écrit:
It has been reported that the author intends the line of page 77,


Where was this reported?
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Neep
Prétorien


Inscrit le: 09 Jan 2023
Messages: 298
MessagePosté le: Ven Mai 31, 2024 7:39 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
https://www.artdelaguerre.fr/adlg/v3/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9088
Ramses II speaking for the author.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
AlanCutner
Tribun


Inscrit le: 03 Nov 2014
Messages: 747
Localisation: Scotland
MessagePosté le: Sam Juin 01, 2024 2:20 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Neep a écrit:
"Within" has a fixed definition in English, "not more than".

Unfortunately not the case. OED states 'within' can mean 'inside x', eg. inside 1UD. It can also mean 'not further than x', ie not further than 1UD. So dictionaries don't help.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Neep
Prétorien


Inscrit le: 09 Jan 2023
Messages: 298
MessagePosté le: Sam Juin 01, 2024 4:57 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Fixed it. Wink
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Andy Fyfe
Auxiliaire


Inscrit le: 14 Fév 2024
Messages: 80
MessagePosté le: Mar Juin 04, 2024 12:21 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Neep a écrit:
Fixed it. Wink


So the 'consensus' seems to be:

1. Stop at exactly 1 UD
2. Reveal ambush
3. Keep moving as required

Is that correct?

I think this needs to be added to the errata rather than just a 'member of the rules committee made a forum post in 2021'.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Hazelbark
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014
Messages: 1669
MessagePosté le: Mar Juin 04, 2024 2:38 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Andy Fyfe a écrit:


I think this needs to be added to the errata rather than just a 'member of the rules committee made a forum post in 2021'.


I would fully expect rulings to be you must stop as umpires might as you say not accept the post as evidence. I will bring this to El Kreator's attention this summer.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
AlanCutner
Tribun


Inscrit le: 03 Nov 2014
Messages: 747
Localisation: Scotland
MessagePosté le: Mar Juin 04, 2024 3:32 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Hazelbark a écrit:
Andy Fyfe a écrit:


I think this needs to be added to the errata rather than just a 'member of the rules committee made a forum post in 2021'.


I would fully expect rulings to be you must stop as umpires might as you say not accept the post as evidence. I will bring this to El Kreator's attention this summer.

Bit confused. Are you agreeing with Andy that units discovering ambush at 1UD can continue moving after deployment of ambush, or that they must stop moving?
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Hazelbark
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014
Messages: 1669
MessagePosté le: Mer Juin 05, 2024 2:22 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
AlanCutner a écrit:
Hazelbark a écrit:
Andy Fyfe a écrit:


I think this needs to be added to the errata rather than just a 'member of the rules committee made a forum post in 2021'.


I would fully expect rulings to be you must stop as umpires might as you say not accept the post as evidence. I will bring this to El Kreator's attention this summer.

Bit confused. Are you agreeing with Andy that units discovering ambush at 1UD can continue moving after deployment of ambush, or that they must stop moving?


I would rule based on my reading of the rules p 77 that only if its a fake ambush may you resume movement once stopped. But if indeed there is an intent to clarify that with an errata i would change once i knew the errata was coming. Until this thread i had not heard anything contrary was out there.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Mike Bennett
Légat


Inscrit le: 11 Nov 2017
Messages: 582
Localisation: Carnforth, Lancashire, UK
MessagePosté le: Jeu Juin 06, 2024 7:32 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Hazelbark a écrit:


I would fully expect rulings to be you must stop as umpires might as you say not accept the post as evidence. I will bring this to El Kreator's attention this summer.


IMHO it is not a case of not accepting. More fundamentally umpires may feal that it is wrong to impose a rule change on an unsuspecting player, or not even be aware of the change themselves.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
  
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules question V4
Page 1 sur 2 Aller à la page 1, 2  Suivante
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet Toutes les heures sont au format GMT

 
Sauter vers:  
Vous ne pouvez pas poster de nouveaux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas éditer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas supprimer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas voter dans les sondages de ce forum