Art De La Guerre
Bienvenue sur le forum de discussion de la règle de jeu l'Art De La Guerre
 
FAQFAQ RechercherRechercher Liste des MembresListe des Membres Groupes d'utilisateursGroupes d'utilisateurs S'enregistrerS'enregistrer
ProfilProfil Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés ConnexionConnexion
Impetious cav advancing into overlap
Page 1 sur 1
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules questions V3
Auteur Message
Viking709
Auxiliaire


Inscrit le: 15 Jan 2015
Messages: 91
MessagePosté le: Dim Nov 13, 2016 12:05 am    Sujet du message: Impetious cav advancing into overlap Répondre en citant
Two impetious cav YY ZZ charge two HVY foot units 11 22
XX
XX
YYZZ
YYZZ
1122
1122

XX is two UD away and wants to slide past the front corner so he can be side by side along 11 and only pay 1 CP.

YYZZ
XXYYZZ
XX1122
1122

I thought for one CP he had to stop the moment he contacted the corner of 11 or he had to go his full move
He could only slide along and stop alongside 11 only if he paid 2 CP
Which is it?






[/u]
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
footslogger
Vétéran


Inscrit le: 12 Jan 2015
Messages: 166
MessagePosté le: Dim Nov 13, 2016 3:08 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
I would say it costs 2 because it is doing something unusual. According to the FAQ you can stop short for 1cp if you end in contact. So the technical answer might be 1, but here you are not going your full distance, and not stopping as soon as you are in support, so I don't see how an unmaneuverable unit does that without paying 2.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Wagmestre
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 27 Juil 2010
Messages: 1234
Localisation: Ballainviliers (France)
MessagePosté le: Dim Nov 13, 2016 3:18 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
2 posts for the same.
1 pc.
Impetuous can pay just 1 pc for a uncomplete movement if end in contact (even supporting), but not necesseraly "as soon as" contacting.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
footslogger
Vétéran


Inscrit le: 12 Jan 2015
Messages: 166
MessagePosté le: Dim Nov 13, 2016 4:00 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Wagmestre a écrit:
2 posts for the same.
1 pc.
Impetuous can pay just 1 pc for a uncomplete movement if end in contact (even supporting), but not necesseraly "as soon as" contacting.


I can see that from the FAQ but I think it's a mistake. The point of unmaneuverable I would guess is that you have to pay to make them do something specific like this. This seems like pretty fine grain control for troops like this and only a single CP.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Wagmestre
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 27 Juil 2010
Messages: 1234
Localisation: Ballainviliers (France)
MessagePosté le: Dim Nov 13, 2016 4:14 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
I have not my ruleset with me, but impetuous can do un uncomplete movement paying only one point if ending in contact.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
footslogger
Vétéran


Inscrit le: 12 Jan 2015
Messages: 166
MessagePosté le: Dim Nov 13, 2016 4:40 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Wagmestre a écrit:
I have not my ruleset with me, but impetuous can do un uncomplete movement paying only one point if ending in contact.


I agree, and the FAQ makes that clear. But in this particular case, the impetuous units are ending in contact at a particular position, not just stopping as soon as contact is made. And it seems like that is the kind of thing that you would want to distinguish between non-maneuverable units and maneuverable units. This allows the unmaneuverable unit the ability to make a precise positioning with no extra cost.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Viking709
Auxiliaire


Inscrit le: 15 Jan 2015
Messages: 91
MessagePosté le: Dim Nov 13, 2016 5:09 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Footslogger. I agree with you and that's why I posted this. How is this being played in France?
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Wagmestre
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 27 Juil 2010
Messages: 1234
Localisation: Ballainviliers (France)
MessagePosté le: Dim Nov 13, 2016 5:13 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
I think dificult manoeuvres are listed in the rules.
And I don't think those ending in contact with an ennemy unit are difficult.
Maybe am I wrong.

Once again, I have not my ruleset with me right now.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
footslogger
Vétéran


Inscrit le: 12 Jan 2015
Messages: 166
MessagePosté le: Dim Nov 13, 2016 5:34 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Wagmestre a écrit:
I think dificult manoeuvres are listed in the rules.
And I don't think those ending in contact with an ennemy unit are difficult.
Maybe am I wrong.

Once again, I have not my ruleset with me right now.


I don't think you are reading the rules wrong, this just seems like a circumstance where there is a seem in the logic....
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Viking709
Auxiliaire


Inscrit le: 15 Jan 2015
Messages: 91
MessagePosté le: Dim Nov 13, 2016 6:38 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
I interpret it as the moment the unmanuverable impetious cavalry comes in corner to corner contact and in a support position it stops To
Move beyond that point rewards the unmanuverable unit as if it wasn't unmanuverable. The moment it makes contact it stops therefore only one CP.

Now a rules lawyer could wheel right and then wheel left to try and contact the unit along its side edge and then conform and be side to side as long as it has enough movement. But again I don't think that's the authors intent
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Wagmestre
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 27 Juil 2010
Messages: 1234
Localisation: Ballainviliers (France)
MessagePosté le: Dim Nov 13, 2016 7:37 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Pages 32 and 40/41.
Nothing such as "as soon as" or "just corner to corner".
Only movement ending in contact.

Clear, simple and easy, isn't it ?
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Hazelbark
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014
Messages: 1669
MessagePosté le: Lun Nov 14, 2016 11:27 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
The question in rule design is how handicapped do you want impetuous units to be? I think after playing them they are not as severely handicapped as first assumed.

This posting is one of the examples of why not.

They still have significant limitations.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
  
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules questions V3
Page 1 sur 1
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet Toutes les heures sont au format GMT

 
Sauter vers:  
Vous ne pouvez pas poster de nouveaux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas éditer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas supprimer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas voter dans les sondages de ce forum