Auteur |
Message |
Amra
Gladiateur
Inscrit le: 14 Juil 2016 Messages: 38
Localisation: Melbourne,Australia
|
Posté le: Mar Jan 03, 2017 6:49 am Sujet du message: Two more questions |
|
OK,
Two more out of a recent game
1) The attacker moves to less than 4 UD of an ambush marker . In the defenders turn the command in ambush is unreliable.
Can they just reveal their ambush ( costs no pips ,not prohibited p73) , be within 4UD and now reliable as a command ?
2) LH evade . They move back to their own HC who are on a slight angle. Can they wheel to line up and interpenetrate the HC or must they treat the HC as an obstacle and start to wheel away from them when 1 UD away ?
Thanks all |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
daveallen
Tribun

Inscrit le: 28 Jan 2016 Messages: 758
Localisation: Rugby & CLWC
|
Posté le: Mar Jan 03, 2017 7:26 am Sujet du message: |
|
1) No - see Ambush and Allied Unreliable command below
2) not sure about this one, but on balance I'd say that they could interpenetrate by wheeling. On the basis that if you can wheel to avoid enemy in the path of the evade you should be able to use the same manoeuvre to pass through friends.
Dave |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Amra
Gladiateur
Inscrit le: 14 Juil 2016 Messages: 38
Localisation: Melbourne,Australia
|
Posté le: Mar Jan 03, 2017 8:37 am Sujet du message: |
|
Thanks,
1) FFS I must still be drunk from NYE , sorry
2) Troops you can't interpenatrate are an obstacle. Nothing says you can wheel to be able to line up with an obstacle but it feels very fiddly not to & out of keeping with the rules simple approach |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
daveallen
Tribun

Inscrit le: 28 Jan 2016 Messages: 758
Localisation: Rugby & CLWC
|
Posté le: Mar Jan 03, 2017 10:25 am Sujet du message: |
|
Amra a écrit: | 2) Troops you can't interpenatrate are an obstacle. Nothing says you can wheel to be able to line up with an obstacle but it feels very fiddly not to & out of keeping with the rules simple approach |
Generally, I go with the view that anything not explicitly permitted by the rules is not allowed. That's why I'm not 100% on this, but I feel it's close enough to the "wheel by the minimum necessary to avoid an obstacle" rule that it would be silly to be able to wheel 90° across the face of an enemy unit, but not 3° to pass through friends. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
lionelrus
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2009 Messages: 4803
Localisation: paris
|
Posté le: Mar Jan 03, 2017 11:00 am Sujet du message: |
|
At first the HC cannot be interpenetrated, so it's a obstacle.
After wheeling, the HC can be interpenetrated, so it's not a obstacle anymore.
So th e rule " weeling by the minimum necessary to avoid a obstacle " applies. _________________ "Quand on a pas de technique, faut y aller à la zob"
Perceval à Yvain et Gauvain. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Commodore
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 23 Aoû 2012 Messages: 1238
Localisation: London
|
Posté le: Mar Jan 03, 2017 11:29 am Sujet du message: |
|
lionelrus a écrit: | At first the HC cannot be interpenetrated, so it's a obstacle.
After wheeling, the HC can be interpenetrated, so it's not a obstacle anymore.
So th e rule " weeling by the minimum necessary to avoid a obstacle " applies. |
And the wheeling distance is counted in the evade total move _________________ "Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead"
Cdr Farragut,Mobile 1864 |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
lionelrus
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 21 Mar 2009 Messages: 4803
Localisation: paris
|
Posté le: Mar Jan 03, 2017 2:44 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Commodore a écrit: | lionelrus a écrit: | At first the HC cannot be interpenetrated, so it's a obstacle.
After wheeling, the HC can be interpenetrated, so it's not a obstacle anymore.
So th e rule " weeling by the minimum necessary to avoid a obstacle " applies. |
And the wheeling distance is counted in the evade total move |
Of course, dear old salty dog! _________________ "Quand on a pas de technique, faut y aller à la zob"
Perceval à Yvain et Gauvain. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1669
|
Posté le: Mar Jan 03, 2017 5:59 pm Sujet du message: Re: Two more questions |
|
Amra a écrit: |
2) LH evade . They move back to their own HC who are on a slight angle. Can they wheel to line up and interpenetrate the HC or must they treat the HC as an obstacle and start to wheel away from them when 1 UD away ?
|
Yes you can wheel to pass through. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Amra
Gladiateur
Inscrit le: 14 Juil 2016 Messages: 38
Localisation: Melbourne,Australia
|
Posté le: Mer Jan 04, 2017 12:16 am Sujet du message: |
|
Great , but can anyone point to a rule which allows it ?
The rules are clear about options for obstacles and wheeling towards them isn't one of them |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
ethan
Signifer
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 354
|
Posté le: Mer Jan 04, 2017 2:33 am Sujet du message: |
|
I believe if you look on p.39 item 6 - Evade move it will clear things up. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Amra
Gladiateur
Inscrit le: 14 Juil 2016 Messages: 38
Localisation: Melbourne,Australia
|
Posté le: Mer Jan 04, 2017 3:40 am Sujet du message: |
|
Hmm not really
It says units that can be interpenetrated are not obstacles , but the HC can only be interpenetrated if the LC wheel in a way they are not allowed to do ( p39 , 6-Evade move)
I agree wheeling to go thru seems reasonable , its just we are about to have our National tournament and I want to be able to point to the rule for someone who plays it different
Can I just say Hazelbark says ?  |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
ethan
Signifer
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 354
|
Posté le: Mer Jan 04, 2017 3:48 am Sujet du message: |
|
"Friendly units that can be interpenetrated are not considered obstacles"
and "This wheel must be the minimum necessary to avoid the obstacle."
So you wheel to line up and then there is no obstacle. I don't see how this is different than any other wheel to avoid an obstacle... |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Amra
Gladiateur
Inscrit le: 14 Juil 2016 Messages: 38
Localisation: Melbourne,Australia
|
Posté le: Mer Jan 04, 2017 3:55 am Sujet du message: |
|
It's probably just a language thing , evades say you must " avoid the obstacles" when within 1 UD not change direction to go thru it .
Meh , it makes more sense for the LC to wheel Ill just use your logic & see how it goes  |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
madaxeman
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 01 Nov 2014 Messages: 1599
Localisation: Londres Centraal.
|
Posté le: Mer Jan 04, 2017 11:56 am Sujet du message: |
|
Amra a écrit: | It's probably just a language thing |
Yeah. Once you work out that these rules aren't written in Barkerese it becomes a lot easier to work out what they mean ! _________________ www.madaxeman.com |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1669
|
Posté le: Mer Jan 04, 2017 2:46 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Exactly it is VERY important to shed the obtuse dogmas of Barkerese legalisms. Ironically at time Barker would agree with that an believes players made it the problem not him.
Also if you read the p 39 bottom right column. it says if you encounter an obstacle "you maneuver to avoid it". The it explains shifts and wheels so it really is very clear. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
|