Art De La Guerre
Bienvenue sur le forum de discussion de la règle de jeu l'Art De La Guerre
 
FAQFAQ RechercherRechercher Liste des MembresListe des Membres Groupes d'utilisateursGroupes d'utilisateurs S'enregistrerS'enregistrer
ProfilProfil Se connecter pour vérifier ses messages privésSe connecter pour vérifier ses messages privés ConnexionConnexion
Side to side conforming and factors
Page 1 sur 2 Aller à la page 1, 2  Suivante
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules questions V3
Auteur Message
papadopp
Gladiateur


Inscrit le: 24 Oct 2014
Messages: 32
MessagePosté le: Ven Mar 03, 2017 1:21 pm    Sujet du message: Side to side conforming and factors Répondre en citant
Taken from FAQ p. 7 (sorry for not placing the diagram)
Previous example follow-up
B has been destroyed in melee.
D and C are in contact without being able to fight. C can then move freely, and, should the player want it, conform for free to attack D in the flank. We consider this is the follow-up of the previous melee.

In such a case, is D's basic factor reduced to Zero? And as C is the main unit situated in the enamy's flank in melee, does it get +1?

Thank you in advance
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
madaxeman
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 01 Nov 2014
Messages: 1599
Localisation: Londres Centraal.
MessagePosté le: Ven Mar 03, 2017 1:58 pm    Sujet du message: Re: Side to side conforming and factors Répondre en citant
papadopp a écrit:
Taken from FAQ p. 7 (sorry for not placing the diagram)
Previous example follow-up
B has been destroyed in melee.
D and C are in contact without being able to fight. C can then move freely, and, should the player want it, conform for free to attack D in the flank. We consider this is the follow-up of the previous melee.

In such a case, is D's basic factor reduced to Zero? And as C is the main unit situated in the enamy's flank in melee, does it get +1?

Thank you in advance


A free 'conform' is a (quite clever) mechanic to continue an existing melee combat between opposing lines of units. It is zero pips, and both units just turn and continue the melee as if they were engaged in the previous turn using their melee factors - no-one gets charging or flanking bonuses or effects. Its the same mechanic as conforming sideways for free when you start in corner to corner, but for troops who start side to side.

If you pay pips however when you are in the same situation, you can 'charge' into the enemy flank, and then it will count as a "charge", with bonuses and effects.
_________________
www.madaxeman.com
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé Visiter le site web de l'utilisateur
Pebbo
Barbare


Inscrit le: 09 Avr 2016
Messages: 27
MessagePosté le: Sam Mar 04, 2017 8:43 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Madaxeman

Re your second para - I agree but I've heard it argued that you can't charge an enemy you are already in contact with. I think there is something in the rules which could be interpreted in this way but I can't find it now. Anyway the FAQ does seem to suggest that you are right though it doesn't use the word charge.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Longtooth
Signifer


Inscrit le: 14 Oct 2014
Messages: 357
Localisation: Oxford
MessagePosté le: Sam Mar 04, 2017 11:16 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Found it!

See page 50, under "charge" heading:

A unit that starts its movement already in contact with the enemy (eg only by a corner) cannot charge it, but can move into melee with it by simply conforming

Based upon the above, your only options are to: (a) conforrm; (b) charge a seperate enemy unit; (c) or remain in place.

Jesse
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
madaxeman
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 01 Nov 2014
Messages: 1599
Localisation: Londres Centraal.
MessagePosté le: Sam Mar 04, 2017 6:18 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
That'll teach me to answer questions without my rules... !
_________________
www.madaxeman.com
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé Visiter le site web de l'utilisateur
papadopp
Gladiateur


Inscrit le: 24 Oct 2014
Messages: 32
MessagePosté le: Sam Mar 04, 2017 7:36 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Thank you all - still not sure about what is really happening here

The phasing unit in side to side contact may contact the opposing unit's flank - legal flank contact (p.51) - for free as a conforming move, as Tim states? - as a charge move paying CP, and having all charge's bonuses? both ways? - and in both cases, the main attacking unit is situated in the opponent's flank, so +1? moreover, feels a little cheesy to drop the opponent's BF to zero when charging, and not doing so if conforming (same initial position and same final one) - feeling that this particular situation is crucial and I 'd appreciate an official clarry
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Hazelbark
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014
Messages: 1669
MessagePosté le: Lun Mar 06, 2017 3:35 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
I think there is some confusion here.

There is no charge when in contact.

The issue if you read on to p 8 of the faq.

When you are in contact you may not charge. The issue is do you conform or must you pay a CP or 2 to turn to melee.

So charge abilities do not apply either way.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
gregfilip
Légionaire


Inscrit le: 15 Fév 2017
Messages: 112
MessagePosté le: Lun Mar 06, 2017 8:02 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
so .acording to all i ve read so far ,and as a new art player i understand that in the game there are 2 different ways of initiating a combat.CHARGE+ATTACK[when u are already in contact with enemy.]
Can u define please which are the charge abilities that doesnt occur in a simple attack?
thnx
greg.

btw from the faq page 7.
D and C are in contact without being able to fight. C
can then move freely, and, should the player want it,
conform for free to attack D in the flank
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
gregfilip
Légionaire


Inscrit le: 15 Fév 2017
Messages: 112
MessagePosté le: Lun Mar 06, 2017 9:47 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
gregfilip a écrit:
so .acording to all i ve read so far ,and as a new art player i understand that in the game there are 2 different ways of initiating a combat.CHARGE+ATTACK[when u are already in contact with enemy.]
Can u define please which are the charge abilities that doesnt occur in a simple attack?
thnx
greg.

btw from the faq page 7.
D and C are in contact without being able to fight. C
can then move freely, and, should the player want it,
conform for free to attack D in the flank
.

In the second image of page 7 FAQ if C conforms and attack D in the flank it doesnt count as a charge cause they are aready in combat.corect? what modifiers apply if C conforms to D in the flank?
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
madaxeman
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 01 Nov 2014
Messages: 1599
Localisation: Londres Centraal.
MessagePosté le: Lun Mar 06, 2017 12:55 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
I believe this could be an English/French translation issue, and that the international brains trust are looking at this as we speak...

So, an answer is coming..
_________________
www.madaxeman.com
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé Visiter le site web de l'utilisateur
Hazelbark
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014
Messages: 1669
MessagePosté le: Lun Mar 06, 2017 4:56 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
You can move into melee via a charge or conform.

I don't believe this a translation problem. I believe the reader error occurs from reading a sentence and drawing conclusions, without reading.

Attack depending on where you read it refers to a situation where melee is taking place.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Hazelbark
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014
Messages: 1669
MessagePosté le: Lun Mar 06, 2017 5:05 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
gregfilip a écrit:

In the second image of page 7 FAQ if C conforms and attack D in the flank it doesnt count as a charge cause they are aready in combat.corect? what modifiers apply if C conforms to D in the flank?


It is NOT a charge. It is a conform.

C will use its normal basic factor vs the D troop type.
It will get NO charge abilities.
It will get a +1 situation modifier for being on the flank.
D will have its basic factor set to zero.

Then you have things like generals and cohesions hits taken into account.
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
gregfilip
Légionaire


Inscrit le: 15 Fév 2017
Messages: 112
MessagePosté le: Lun Mar 06, 2017 9:23 pm    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Hazelbark a écrit:
You can move into melee via a charge or conform.

I don't believe this a translation problem. I believe the reader error occurs from reading a sentence and drawing conclusions, without reading.

Attack depending on where you read it refers to a situation where melee is taking place.


Agree ,i drew early conclusions ,attack was an incorect word!
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
Zoltan
Légat


Inscrit le: 18 Jan 2015
Messages: 500
Localisation: Wellington, New Zealand
MessagePosté le: Mar Mar 07, 2017 12:43 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
I'm still unclear about this.

Two opposing units are in contact with each other along the full extent of one of their sides. One unit faces up. The other unit faces down.

1. Because these two units are already "in contact" with each other, neither can charge the other. True/False

2. The phasing player may conform his unit to the opponent's flank at no UD cost, to "continue the existing melee". True/False

3. This counts as a flank attack but because it was a conform and not a charge the opponent does not suffer a disorder. True/False
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé
madaxeman
Magister Militum


Inscrit le: 01 Nov 2014
Messages: 1599
Localisation: Londres Centraal.
MessagePosté le: Mar Mar 07, 2017 10:11 am    Sujet du message: Répondre en citant
Zoltan a écrit:
I'm still unclear about this.

Two opposing units are in contact with each other along the full extent of one of their sides. One unit faces up. The other unit faces down.

1. Because these two units are already "in contact" with each other, neither can charge the other. True/False

2. The phasing player may conform his unit to the opponent's flank at no UD cost, to "continue the existing melee". True/False

3. This counts as a flank attack but because it was a conform and not a charge the opponent does not suffer a disorder. True/False


1. yes. page 50

2. yes.

3. yes and no. You only ever cause disorder if the enemy are contacted on 2 separate faces in the same turn. The opponent WILL fight at zero, and you WILL get a +1 for attacking the flank however.

Sorry for confusing everyone before... Embarassed
_________________
www.madaxeman.com
Revenir en haut de page
Voir le profil de l'utilisateur Envoyer un message privé Visiter le site web de l'utilisateur
  
 Art De La Guerre Index du Forum > Rules questions V3
Page 1 sur 2 Aller à la page 1, 2  Suivante
Poster un nouveau sujet   Répondre au sujet Toutes les heures sont au format GMT

 
Sauter vers:  
Vous ne pouvez pas poster de nouveaux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas éditer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas supprimer vos messages dans ce forum
Vous ne pouvez pas voter dans les sondages de ce forum