Auteur |
Message |
papadopp
Gladiateur
Inscrit le: 24 Oct 2014 Messages: 32
|
Posté le: Ven Mar 03, 2017 1:21 pm Sujet du message: Side to side conforming and factors |
|
Taken from FAQ p. 7 (sorry for not placing the diagram)
Previous example follow-up
B has been destroyed in melee.
D and C are in contact without being able to fight. C can then move freely, and, should the player want it, conform for free to attack D in the flank. We consider this is the follow-up of the previous melee.
In such a case, is D's basic factor reduced to Zero? And as C is the main unit situated in the enamy's flank in melee, does it get +1?
Thank you in advance |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
madaxeman
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 01 Nov 2014 Messages: 1599
Localisation: Londres Centraal.
|
Posté le: Ven Mar 03, 2017 1:58 pm Sujet du message: Re: Side to side conforming and factors |
|
papadopp a écrit: | Taken from FAQ p. 7 (sorry for not placing the diagram)
Previous example follow-up
B has been destroyed in melee.
D and C are in contact without being able to fight. C can then move freely, and, should the player want it, conform for free to attack D in the flank. We consider this is the follow-up of the previous melee.
In such a case, is D's basic factor reduced to Zero? And as C is the main unit situated in the enamy's flank in melee, does it get +1?
Thank you in advance |
A free 'conform' is a (quite clever) mechanic to continue an existing melee combat between opposing lines of units. It is zero pips, and both units just turn and continue the melee as if they were engaged in the previous turn using their melee factors - no-one gets charging or flanking bonuses or effects. Its the same mechanic as conforming sideways for free when you start in corner to corner, but for troops who start side to side.
If you pay pips however when you are in the same situation, you can 'charge' into the enemy flank, and then it will count as a "charge", with bonuses and effects. _________________ www.madaxeman.com |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Pebbo
Barbare
Inscrit le: 09 Avr 2016 Messages: 27
|
Posté le: Sam Mar 04, 2017 8:43 am Sujet du message: |
|
Madaxeman
Re your second para - I agree but I've heard it argued that you can't charge an enemy you are already in contact with. I think there is something in the rules which could be interpreted in this way but I can't find it now. Anyway the FAQ does seem to suggest that you are right though it doesn't use the word charge. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Longtooth
Signifer
Inscrit le: 14 Oct 2014 Messages: 357
Localisation: Oxford
|
Posté le: Sam Mar 04, 2017 11:16 am Sujet du message: |
|
Found it!
See page 50, under "charge" heading:
A unit that starts its movement already in contact with the enemy (eg only by a corner) cannot charge it, but can move into melee with it by simply conforming
Based upon the above, your only options are to: (a) conforrm; (b) charge a seperate enemy unit; (c) or remain in place.
Jesse |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
madaxeman
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 01 Nov 2014 Messages: 1599
Localisation: Londres Centraal.
|
Posté le: Sam Mar 04, 2017 6:18 pm Sujet du message: |
|
That'll teach me to answer questions without my rules... ! _________________ www.madaxeman.com |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
papadopp
Gladiateur
Inscrit le: 24 Oct 2014 Messages: 32
|
Posté le: Sam Mar 04, 2017 7:36 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Thank you all - still not sure about what is really happening here
The phasing unit in side to side contact may contact the opposing unit's flank - legal flank contact (p.51) - for free as a conforming move, as Tim states? - as a charge move paying CP, and having all charge's bonuses? both ways? - and in both cases, the main attacking unit is situated in the opponent's flank, so +1? moreover, feels a little cheesy to drop the opponent's BF to zero when charging, and not doing so if conforming (same initial position and same final one) - feeling that this particular situation is crucial and I 'd appreciate an official clarry |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1669
|
Posté le: Lun Mar 06, 2017 3:35 am Sujet du message: |
|
I think there is some confusion here.
There is no charge when in contact.
The issue if you read on to p 8 of the faq.
When you are in contact you may not charge. The issue is do you conform or must you pay a CP or 2 to turn to melee.
So charge abilities do not apply either way. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
gregfilip
Légionaire
Inscrit le: 15 Fév 2017 Messages: 112
|
Posté le: Lun Mar 06, 2017 8:02 am Sujet du message: |
|
so .acording to all i ve read so far ,and as a new art player i understand that in the game there are 2 different ways of initiating a combat.CHARGE+ATTACK[when u are already in contact with enemy.]
Can u define please which are the charge abilities that doesnt occur in a simple attack?
thnx
greg.
btw from the faq page 7.
D and C are in contact without being able to fight. C
can then move freely, and, should the player want it,
conform for free to attack D in the flank |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
gregfilip
Légionaire
Inscrit le: 15 Fév 2017 Messages: 112
|
Posté le: Lun Mar 06, 2017 9:47 am Sujet du message: |
|
gregfilip a écrit: | so .acording to all i ve read so far ,and as a new art player i understand that in the game there are 2 different ways of initiating a combat.CHARGE+ATTACK[when u are already in contact with enemy.]
Can u define please which are the charge abilities that doesnt occur in a simple attack?
thnx
greg.
btw from the faq page 7.
D and C are in contact without being able to fight. C
can then move freely, and, should the player want it,
conform for free to attack D in the flank | .
In the second image of page 7 FAQ if C conforms and attack D in the flank it doesnt count as a charge cause they are aready in combat.corect? what modifiers apply if C conforms to D in the flank? |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
madaxeman
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 01 Nov 2014 Messages: 1599
Localisation: Londres Centraal.
|
Posté le: Lun Mar 06, 2017 12:55 pm Sujet du message: |
|
I believe this could be an English/French translation issue, and that the international brains trust are looking at this as we speak...
So, an answer is coming.. _________________ www.madaxeman.com |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1669
|
Posté le: Lun Mar 06, 2017 4:56 pm Sujet du message: |
|
You can move into melee via a charge or conform.
I don't believe this a translation problem. I believe the reader error occurs from reading a sentence and drawing conclusions, without reading.
Attack depending on where you read it refers to a situation where melee is taking place. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Hazelbark
Magister Militum
Inscrit le: 12 Nov 2014 Messages: 1669
|
Posté le: Lun Mar 06, 2017 5:05 pm Sujet du message: |
|
gregfilip a écrit: |
In the second image of page 7 FAQ if C conforms and attack D in the flank it doesnt count as a charge cause they are aready in combat.corect? what modifiers apply if C conforms to D in the flank? |
It is NOT a charge. It is a conform.
C will use its normal basic factor vs the D troop type.
It will get NO charge abilities.
It will get a +1 situation modifier for being on the flank.
D will have its basic factor set to zero.
Then you have things like generals and cohesions hits taken into account. |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
gregfilip
Légionaire
Inscrit le: 15 Fév 2017 Messages: 112
|
Posté le: Lun Mar 06, 2017 9:23 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Hazelbark a écrit: | You can move into melee via a charge or conform.
I don't believe this a translation problem. I believe the reader error occurs from reading a sentence and drawing conclusions, without reading.
Attack depending on where you read it refers to a situation where melee is taking place. |
Agree ,i drew early conclusions ,attack was an incorect word! |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Zoltan
Légat
Inscrit le: 18 Jan 2015 Messages: 500
Localisation: Wellington, New Zealand
|
Posté le: Mar Mar 07, 2017 12:43 am Sujet du message: |
|
I'm still unclear about this.
Two opposing units are in contact with each other along the full extent of one of their sides. One unit faces up. The other unit faces down.
1. Because these two units are already "in contact" with each other, neither can charge the other. True/False
2. The phasing player may conform his unit to the opponent's flank at no UD cost, to "continue the existing melee". True/False
3. This counts as a flank attack but because it was a conform and not a charge the opponent does not suffer a disorder. True/False |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
madaxeman
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 01 Nov 2014 Messages: 1599
Localisation: Londres Centraal.
|
Posté le: Mar Mar 07, 2017 10:11 am Sujet du message: |
|
Zoltan a écrit: | I'm still unclear about this.
Two opposing units are in contact with each other along the full extent of one of their sides. One unit faces up. The other unit faces down.
1. Because these two units are already "in contact" with each other, neither can charge the other. True/False
2. The phasing player may conform his unit to the opponent's flank at no UD cost, to "continue the existing melee". True/False
3. This counts as a flank attack but because it was a conform and not a charge the opponent does not suffer a disorder. True/False |
1. yes. page 50
2. yes.
3. yes and no. You only ever cause disorder if the enemy are contacted on 2 separate faces in the same turn. The opponent WILL fight at zero, and you WILL get a +1 for attacking the flank however.
Sorry for confusing everyone before...  _________________ www.madaxeman.com |
|
Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
|