| Auteur |
Message |
Andy Fyfe
Légionaire
Inscrit le: 14 Fév 2024 Messages: 135
|
Posté le: Lun Nov 24, 2025 4:43 pm Sujet du message: Charge target |
|
Hi Guys,
When charging the procedure on p43 states:
The player indicates the initial target and checks that it is within charge range
Is the 'target' a single unit or single group or can it be several dispirit units and groups?
For example, say I have a unit of four cavalry in a line facing two groups of light horse each made up of two units. The LH units are separated by 1 UD and one is closer to my cavalry than the other.
For the charge do I:
1. Indicate one unit of the LH as the target?
2. Indicate both units of LH as the target?
This matters due to the adjusted charge distance which only kicks in if 'all initial targets evade'.
Andy |
|
| Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Neep
Signifer
Inscrit le: 09 Jan 2023 Messages: 376
|
Posté le: Lun Nov 24, 2025 5:12 pm Sujet du message: |
|
| It is all the targets which will be contacted first. If the line makes simultaneous contact, then there are multiple initial targets. |
|
| Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Ramses II
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015 Messages: 1286
Localisation: London
|
Posté le: Lun Nov 24, 2025 7:22 pm Sujet du message: |
|
Agreed.Â
. . . . BB
AA
. XXXX
Using the example presented by Andy, XXXX are 4x cavalry facing up the page, AA and BB are two pairs of LC facing down. All the formations are parallel.Â
XXXX declares AA as the initial target, because this group will be contacted first. This group reacts (and evades), so the chargers dice to adjust their charge movement. In doing so, check whether the chargers may encounter BB, in which case it may evade in turn.Â
If the groups are at an angle, the first unit to be contacted is the initial target, though other units may be grouped together and may evade accordingly. |
|
| Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Zoltan
Légat
Inscrit le: 18 Jan 2015 Messages: 526
Localisation: Wellington, New Zealand
|
Posté le: Lun Nov 24, 2025 9:18 pm Sujet du message: |
|
In Ramses example all the XXXXs are charging as one group.
A permutation would be if two XXs each charge AA and BB. This would be two charges, two groups, two initial targets.
Back to Ramses' single XXXX group charge (per his pic). Let's say the XXXXs are impetuous cavalry and that AA choses NOT to evade. For completeness, just checking regarding p.43 Continuing a charge:
- while AA may be the initial target of group XXXX's charge, it looks like two of the XXs will NOT contact an A,
- so two of the (impetuous) XXs will be obliged to continue their charge towards BB,
- in a sense BB is their initial target, but the text appears to indicate "continuing a charge declared by the group against initial target A",
- BB is a secondary target per p.44,
- if BB chooses to evade, the two XX units (continuing their group's charge on AA) will NOT VMD, despite the p.44 text wording "...maximum adjusted movement allowance.". |
|
| Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
KevinD
Tribun
Inscrit le: 23 Aoû 2021 Messages: 712
Localisation: Texas
|
Posté le: Mar Nov 25, 2025 2:35 am Sujet du message: |
|
Two of XXXX will stop to melee AA and another X will stop to provide simple support. The fourth X may/will continue on to contact BB.
VMD is only used if ALL initial targets (both of AA in this case) evade. |
|
| Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Zoltan
Légat
Inscrit le: 18 Jan 2015 Messages: 526
Localisation: Wellington, New Zealand
|
Posté le: Mar Nov 25, 2025 3:00 am Sujet du message: |
|
| KevinD a écrit: | Two of XXXX will stop to melee AA and another X will stop to provide simple support. The fourth X may/will continue on to contact BB.
VMD is only used if ALL initial targets (both of AA in this case) evade. |
Judging from Ramses pic only one X will hit with a second X in simple support. But the key point is that the other (two) Xs will continue their charge without VMD and WILL hit BB. By definition (p.43) units can only continue a charge if they can contact a new enemy (ignoring pursuing evaders - not relevant in my variant of Ramses scenario). |
|
| Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Andy Fyfe
Légionaire
Inscrit le: 14 Fév 2024 Messages: 135
|
Posté le: Mar Nov 25, 2025 9:37 am Sujet du message: |
|
| Zoltan a écrit: | | KevinD a écrit: | Two of XXXX will stop to melee AA and another X will stop to provide simple support. The fourth X may/will continue on to contact BB.
VMD is only used if ALL initial targets (both of AA in this case) evade. |
Judging from Ramses pic only one X will hit with a second X in simple support. But the key point is that the other (two) Xs will continue their charge without VMD and WILL hit BB. By definition (p.43) units can only continue a charge if they can contact a new enemy (ignoring pursuing evaders - not relevant in my variant of Ramses scenario). |
OK; so just to check - declaring a charge is against a single unit / single group then? |
|
| Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
Ramses II
Magister Militum

Inscrit le: 17 Juil 2015 Messages: 1286
Localisation: London
|
Posté le: Mar Nov 25, 2025 10:38 am Sujet du message: |
|
Andy;Â
Yes, declaring a charge is against a single unit / group. The charge process then handles the situation as events unfold.Â
Zoltan, Kevin;
If AA stand against the charge of impetuous XXXX, then one (or two) units not in support must continue moving, but only if they will contact another enemy (BB here). Â
Ideally this will be determined before XXXX start moving to ensure all the units move the correct  distances.
As Zoltan says | Citation: | | Â Continuing a charge is optional for non-Impetuous units. It is mandatory for all Impetuous units but only if they can contact a new enemy or if they are pursuing evading units unless this would result in any of the "Exceptions to uncontrolled charges" (see p 46). |
|
|
| Revenir en haut de page |
|
|
|