Art De La Guerre

[AntiokosIII]

I do not see how you can read that rule, disagree with Ethan, and still claim to be speaking English. It is quite clear. For once.
_________________
Tabletop miniatures are the only completely honorable form of warfare ever invented.

[Dickstick]

Priceless from an American
_________________
Player 747 don't call me Jumbo

[Janos Hunyadi]

I can see why you might read it that way. If you just read it literally in the context of the Unit Characteristics Table, it seems very specific about "MI".

I guess if they were specific in the first line LI,LMI,MI and Levies,
they could have been specific in the last line, and referred to MI and LMI.
That is the part that raises a little doubt.

I guess it would be "reasonable" to "assume" it applied to LMI as well.

It seems CV get the plus in rough/difficult terrain too.

When is LMI not MI ? when it evades (Javelinmen) or shoots.

[Zoltan]

So where did this end up?

First round
Medium cavalry (without Impact bonus) get +1 against Medium Infantry but DO NOT get +1 against Light Medium Infantry.

Subsequent rounds
Medium Cavalry get +1 against both Medium Infantry and Light Medium Infantry.


This doesn't seem to me to be a translation error but rather a deliberate distinction by the author on the basis that the MI present a more dense target to the MC charging in. Or put another way, the LMI is a more dispersed target on impact.

[daveallen]

[lionelrus]

The bonus applies again LMI and MI as El Kréator himself said. The debat has been in france 3 years ago and the answer written in french FAQ.
_________________
"Quand on a pas de technique, faut y aller à la zob"
Perceval à Yvain et Gauvain.

[ethan]

[Dickstick]

The question is in but the answers not.
Last question in two questions
Answer only relates to first.

No were does it say LMI are same as MI.
_________________
Player 747 don't call me Jumbo

[madaxeman]

[Dickstick]

Yes for that one impact factor.
My question is where does it say LMI are MI all the time.
Because why have LMI if people claim they are just MI.
_________________
Player 747 don't call me Jumbo

[footslogger]

[Dickstick]

[quote="madaxeman"][quote="Dickstick"]The question is in but the answers not.
Last question in two questions
Answer only relates to first.

No were does it say LMI are same as MI.[/quote]

"Q : If an impact Cv charges medium spearmen, it will lose the Impact. But does she then get [b]the +1 bonus vs Mi and LMi [/b]? "

That's probably as clear as you will get until the next iteration of the FAQ[/quote]

So the only answer is NO then the bonus is not v MI And LMI just v MI as written in rule book?
So no change.
If one fails to answer both question separately you may not get the result one wishes.
_________________
Player 747 don't call me Jumbo

[Dickstick]

[quote="footslogger"][quote="Dickstick"]Yes for that one impact factor.
My question is where does it say LMI are MI all the time.
Because why have LMI if people claim they are just MI.[/quote]

Can you give an example where it matters?[/quote]

It matters because any blanket cover all statement creates confusion and game delaying discussion

Both LMI and MI have to be listed together in ( from playsheet)
Destroying LI in open
Cavalry melee factors
Shooting ranges for bows
Expand/contract rates
Shooting resolution with bow v mounted.
Melee modifiers, foot in rough

If they are both the same why do this double listing?
_________________
Player 747 don't call me Jumbo

[footslogger]

Let me rephrase. Can you give an example where there is still ambiguity?

[Janos Hunyadi]

slightly off on a tangent, this +1 against MF, does it apply in rough or difficult terrain too ?.

I know the Impact is negated, but the +1 versus MF, does this apply in any terrain ?